Literature DB >> 11074241

Variability of standard clinical protein assays in the analysis of a model urine solution of fragmented albumin.

G A Eppel1, S Nagy, M A Jenkins, R N Tudball, M Daskalakis, N D Balazs, W D Comper.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study investigates the sensitivity of various standard clinical techniques in the detection of albumin fragments. The significance of this work is in the detection of urinary proteins, such as albumin, which has recently been discovered to be excreted as mainly peptide fragments as a result of filtered albumin undergoing degradation during renal passage. All filtered proteins undergo a similar degradation process. DESIGN AND METHODS: Albumin digested with trypsin was used as a model urine solution. The solution was assayed for albumin concentration by various methods including the biuret assay that is known to detect urinary albumin fragments. The digest solution was also analyzed by various clinically used chromagen assays, electrophoretic and chromatographic methods to determine whether they are able to detect the fragmented protein.
RESULTS: The benzethonium chloride, Coomassie blue, and pyrogallol red assays for urine protein, the immunoassay for human albumin and sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis with Coomassie blue staining were unable to detect the albumin fragments. Capillary electrophoresis was sensitive to the fragments but with low resolution. High-performance liquid chromatography gave the best results.
CONCLUSIONS: Many techniques utilized to assay patient urine samples are unable to detect fragmented albumin and, hence, will severely underestimate albumin and protein excretion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11074241     DOI: 10.1016/s0009-9120(00)00156-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biochem        ISSN: 0009-9120            Impact factor:   3.281


  7 in total

1.  Albumin handling by renal tubular epithelial cells in a microfluidic bioreactor.

Authors:  Nicholas Ferrell; Kevin B Ricci; Joseph Groszek; Joseph T Marmerstein; William H Fissell
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Serum and urine electrophoresis for detection and identification of monoclonal proteins.

Authors:  Margaret A Jenkins
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2009-08

3.  The Urine Preservative Acetic Acid Degrades Urine Protein: Implications for Urine Biorepositories and the AASK Cohort Study.

Authors:  Salem Almaani; Lee A Hebert; Brad H Rovin; Daniel J Birmingham
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 10.121

4.  Glomerular permselectivity factors are not responsible for the increase in fractional clearance of albumin in rat glomerulonephritis.

Authors:  K A Greive; D J Nikolic-Paterson; M A Guimarães; J Nikolovski; L M Pratt; W Mu; R C Atkins; W D Comper
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.307

5.  Presence of immunounreactive albumin in the urine of diabetic patients.

Authors:  Aki Nakayama; Takashi Ida; Yoshiji Hatano; Kayoko Oohara; Hiroshi Yoshida; Toshiaki Baba; Hisashi Sakamoto; Kiyoko Shiba
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.352

6.  Determination of urinary peptides in patients with proteinuria.

Authors:  M Prakash; J K Shetty; S Dash; B K Barik; A Sarkar; R Prabhu
Journal:  Indian J Nephrol       Date:  2008-10

Review 7.  Comparison of commonly used assays for the detection of microalbuminuria.

Authors:  Douglas E Busby; George L Bakris
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.738

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.