Intramolecular fluorine migration via four-member cyclic transition states

Gaseous CF(3)(+) interchanges F(+) for O with simple carbonyl compounds. CF(3)(+) reacts with propionaldehyde in the gas phase to produce (CH(3))(2)CF(+) via two competing pathways. Starting with 1-(13)C-propionaldehyde, the major pathway (80%) produces (CH(3))(2)CF(+) with the carbon label in one of the methyl groups. The minor pathway (20%) produces (CH(3))(2)CF(+) with the carbon label in the central position. The relative proportions of these two pathways are measured by (19)F NMR analysis of the neutral CH(3)CF=CH(2) produced by deprotonation of (CH(3))(2)CF(+) at <10(-)(3) Torr in an electron bombardment flow (EBFlow) reactor. Formation of alkene in which carbon is directly bonded to fluorine means that (in the minor product, at least) an F(+) for O transposition occurs via adduct formation followed by 1,3-atom transfer and then isomerization of CH(3)CH(2)CHF(+) to the more stable (CH(3))(2)CF(+). Use of CF(4) as a chemical ionization (CI) reagent gas leads to CF(3)(+) adduct ions for a variety of ketones, in addition to isoelectronic transposition of F(+) for O. Metastable ion decompositions of the adduct ions yield the metathesis products. Decompositions of fluorocycloalkyl cations formed in this manner give evidence for the same kinds of rearrangements as take place in CH(3)CH(2)CHF(+). Density functional calculations confirm that F(+) for O metathesis takes place via addition of CF(3)(+) to the carbonyl oxygen followed by transposition via a four-member cyclic transition state. A computational survey of the effects of different substituents in a series of aldehydes and acyclic ketones reveals no systematic variation of the energy of the transition state as a function of thermochemistry, but the Hammond postulate does appear to be obeyed in terms of progress along the reaction coordinate. Bond lengths corresponding to the central barrier correlate with overall thermochemistry of the F(+) for O interchange, but in a sense opposite to what might have been expected: the transition state becomes more product-like as the metathesis becomes increasingly exothermic. This reversal of the naive interpretation of the Hammond postulate is accounted for by the relative positions of the potential energy wells that precede and follow the central barrier.