Literature DB >> 11073092

Conductivities of three-layer human skull.

M Akhtari1, H C Bryant, A N Mamelak, L Heller, J J Shih, M Mandelkern, A Matlachov, D M Ranken, E D Best, W W Sutherling.   

Abstract

In this study, electrical conductivities of compact, spongiosum, and bulk layers of cadaver skull were determined at varying electric fields at room temperature. Current was applied and withdrawn over the top and bottom surfaces of each sample and potential drop across different layers was measured using the four-electrode method. We developed a model, which considers of variations in skull thicknesses, to determine the conductivity of the tri-layer skull and its individual anatomical structures. The results indicate that the spongiform and the two compact layers of the skull have significantly different and inhomogeneous conductivities ranging from 0.76 +/- .14 to 11.5 +/- 1.8 milliS/m.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11073092     DOI: 10.1023/a:1007882102297

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Topogr        ISSN: 0896-0267            Impact factor:   3.020


  13 in total

Review 1.  Brain-computer interfaces in medicine.

Authors:  Jerry J Shih; Dean J Krusienski; Jonathan R Wolpaw
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 7.616

2.  Anatomical constraints on source models for high-resolution EEG and MEG derived from MRI.

Authors:  Ramesh Srinivasan
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2006-08

3.  Modeling skull electrical properties.

Authors:  R J Sadleir; A Argibay
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2007-07-14       Impact factor: 3.934

4.  Changing head model extent affects finite element predictions of transcranial direct current stimulation distributions.

Authors:  Aprinda Indahlastari; Munish Chauhan; Benjamin Schwartz; Rosalind J Sadleir
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 5.379

5.  Signals from intraventricular depth electrodes can control a brain-computer interface.

Authors:  Jerry J Shih; Dean J Krusienski
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 2.390

6.  Simultaneous head tissue conductivity and EEG source location estimation.

Authors:  Zeynep Akalin Acar; Can E Acar; Scott Makeig
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-08-22       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Individualized tDCS modeling predicts functional connectivity changes within the working memory network in older adults.

Authors:  Aprinda Indahlastari; Alejandro Albizu; Jessica N Kraft; Andrew O'Shea; Nicole R Nissim; Ayden L Dunn; Daniela Carballo; Michael P Gordon; Shreya Taank; Alex T Kahn; Cindy Hernandez; William M Zucker; Adam J Woods
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2021-08-08       Impact factor: 8.955

8.  Harmony: EEG/MEG linear inverse source reconstruction in the anatomical basis of spherical harmonics.

Authors:  Yury Petrov
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Target optimization in transcranial direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Rosalind J Sadleir; Tracy D Vannorsdall; David J Schretlen; Barry Gordon
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 4.157

10.  Numerical simulations of MREIT conductivity imaging for brain tumor detection.

Authors:  Zi Jun Meng; Saurav Z K Sajib; Munish Chauhan; Rosalind J Sadleir; Hyung Joong Kim; Oh In Kwon; Eung Je Woo
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2013-04-29       Impact factor: 2.238

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.