Literature DB >> 11072159

The cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of high-dose palliative radiotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

P Coy1, J Schaafsma, J A Schofield.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compute cost-effectiveness/cost-utility (CE/CU) ratios, from the treatment clinic and societal perspectives, for high-dose palliative radiotherapy treatment (RT) for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) against best supportive care (BSC) as comparator, and thereby demonstrate a method for computing CE/CU ratios when randomized clinical trial (RCT) data cannot be generated. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Unit cost estimates based on an earlier reported 1989-90 analysis of treatment costs at the Vancouver Island Cancer Centre, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada, are updated to 1997-1998 and then used to compute the incremental cost of an average dose of high-dose palliative RT. The incremental number of life days and quality-adjusted life days (QALDs) attributable to treatment are from earlier reported regression analyses of the survival and quality-of-life data from patients who enrolled prospectively in a lung cancer management cost-effectiveness study at the clinic over a 2-year period from 1990 to 1992.
RESULTS: The baseline CE and CU ratios are $9245 Cdn per life year (LY) and $12,836 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY), respectively, from the clinic perspective; and $12,253/LY and $17,012/QALY, respectively, from the societal perspective. Multivariate sensitivity analysis for the CE ratio produces a range of $5513-28,270/LY from the clinic perspective, and $7307-37,465/LY from the societal perspective. Similar calculations for the CU ratio produce a range of $7205-37, 134/QALY from the clinic perspective, and $9550-49,213/QALY from the societal perspective.
CONCLUSION: The cost effectiveness and cost utility of high-dose palliative RT for advanced NSCLC compares favorably with the cost effectiveness of other forms of treatment for NSCLC, of treatments of other forms of cancer, and of many other commonly used medical interventions; and lies within the US $50, 000/QALY benchmark often cited for cost-effective care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11072159     DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(00)00713-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  6 in total

1.  A multi-country health economic evaluation of highly concentrated N-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids in secondary prevention after myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Mark Lamotte; Lieven Annemans; Pawel Kawalec; York Zoellner
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  The cost of lung cancer in Alberta.

Authors:  Sandor J Demeter; Philip Jacobs; Chester Chmielowiec; Wayne Logus; David Hailey; Konrad Fassbender; Alexander McEwan
Journal:  Can Respir J       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.409

3.  Variation in the use of palliative radiotherapy at end of life: examining demographic, clinical, health service, and geographic factors in a population-based study.

Authors:  M Ruth Lavergne; Grace M Johnston; Jun Gao; Trevor Jb Dummer; Dorianne E Rheaume
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2010-10-11       Impact factor: 4.762

Review 4.  The use of Quality-Adjusted Life Years in cost-effectiveness analyses in palliative care: Mapping the debate through an integrative review.

Authors:  Anne B Wichmann; Eddy Mm Adang; Peep Fm Stalmeier; Sinta Kristanti; Lieve Van den Block; Myrra Jfj Vernooij-Dassen; Yvonne Engels
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 4.762

Review 5.  Solitary sites of metastatic disease in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Matthew J Schuchert; James D Luketich
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2003-02

Review 6.  Integrated Palliative Care and Oncologic Care in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Divya Chandrasekar; Erika Tribett; Kavitha Ramchandran
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2016-05
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.