Literature DB >> 11072149

The influence of young age and positive family history of breast cancer on the prognosis of ductal carcinoma in situ treated by excision with or without radiation therapy or by mastectomy.

K A Szelei-Stevens1, R R Kuske, V A Yantsos, G J Cederbom, J S Bolton, B B Fineberg.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Several recent studies have investigated the influence of family history on the progression of DCIS patients treated by tylectomy and radiation therapy. Since three treatment strategies have been used for DCIS at our institution, we evaluated the influence of family history and young age on outcome by treatment method.
METHODS: Between 1/1/82 and 12/31/92, 128 patients were treated for DCIS by mastectomy (n = 50, 39%), tylectomy alone (n = 43, 34%), and tylectomy with radiation therapy (n = 35, 27%). Median follow-up is 8.7 years. Thirty-nine patients had a positive family history of breast cancer; 26 in a mother, sister, or daughter (first-degree relative); and 26 in a grandmother, aunt, or cousin (second-degree relative). Thirteen patients had a positive family history in both first- and second-degree relatives.
RESULTS: Six women developed a recurrence in the treated breast; all of these were initially treated with tylectomy alone. There were no recurrences in the mastectomy group or the tylectomy patients treated with postoperative radiation therapy. Patients with a positive family history had a 10.3% local recurrence rate (LRR), vs. a 2.3% LRR in patients with a negative family history (p = 0.05). Four of 44 patients (9.1%) 50 years of age or younger recurred, compared to two of 84 patients (2.4%) over the age of 50 (p = 0.10). Fifteen patients had both a positive family history and were 50 years of age or younger. Among these women, the recurrence rate was 20%. Women in this group treated by lesionectomy alone had a LRR of 38% (3 of 8).
CONCLUSION: The most important determinant of outcome was the selection of treatment modality, with all of the recurrences occurring in the tylectomy alone group. In addition to treatment method, a positive family history significantly influenced LRR in patients treated by tylectomy, especially in women 50 years of age or younger. These results suggest that DCIS patients, particularly premenopausal women with a positive family history, benefit from treatment of the entire breast, and raise concerns about treating patients with a possible genetic susceptibility to breast cancer with tylectomy alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11072149     DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(00)00715-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  9 in total

Review 1.  Association between patient and tumor characteristics with clinical outcomes in women with ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Tatyana Shamliyan; Shi-Yi Wang; Beth A Virnig; Todd M Tuttle; Robert L Kane
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2010

2.  Evaluation of a breast cancer nomogram for predicting risk of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrences in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ after local excision.

Authors:  Min Yi; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Henry M Kuerer; Elizabeth A Mittendorf; Isabelle Bedrosian; Anthony Lucci; Rosa F Hwang; Jaime R Crow; Sheng Luo; Kelly K Hunt
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Low CD10 mRNA expression identifies high-risk ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).

Authors:  Jérôme Toussaint; Virginie Durbecq; Sevilay Altintas; Valérie Doriath; Ghizlane Rouas; Marianne Paesmans; Philippe Bedard; Benjamin Haibe-Kains; Wiebren A Tjalma; Denis Larsimont; Martine Piccart; Christos Sotiriou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-08-10       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast: Evaluating the Role of Radiation Therapy in the Management and Attempts to Identify Low-risk Patients.

Authors:  Chirag Shah; Frank A Vicini; Sameer Berry; Thomas B Julian; John Ben Wilkinson; Simona F Shaitelman; Atif Khan; Steven E Finkelstein; Neal Goldstein
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.339

5.  Relationship Between Margin Width and Recurrence of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: Analysis of 2996 Women Treated With Breast-conserving Surgery for 30 Years.

Authors:  Kimberly J Van Zee; Preeti Subhedar; Cristina Olcese; Sujata Patil; Monica Morrow
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Family history of breast cancer and all-cause mortality after breast cancer diagnosis in the Breast Cancer Family Registry.

Authors:  Ellen T Chang; Roger L Milne; Kelly-Anne Phillips; Jane C Figueiredo; Meera Sangaramoorthy; Theresa H M Keegan; Irene L Andrulis; John L Hopper; Pamela J Goodwin; Frances P O'Malley; Nayana Weerasooriya; Carmel Apicella; Melissa C Southey; Michael L Friedlander; Graham G Giles; Alice S Whittemore; Dee W West; Esther M John
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2008-11-26       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 7.  Current view on ductal carcinoma in situ and importance of the margin thresholds: A review.

Authors:  A Van Cleef; S Altintas; M Huizing; K Papadimitriou; P Van Dam; W Tjalma
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2014

8.  Relationship Between Anthropometric Factors and Risk of Second Breast Cancer Among Women With a History of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.

Authors:  Meghan R Flanagan; Mei-Tzu C Tang; Michelle L Baglia; Peggy L Porter; Kathleen E Malone; Christopher I Li
Journal:  JNCI Cancer Spectr       Date:  2018-05-30

Review 9.  The diagnosis and management of pre-invasive breast disease: problems associated with management of pre-invasive lesions.

Authors:  Anand D Purushotham
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2003-10-09       Impact factor: 6.466

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.