Literature DB >> 11070588

A cost-minimization analysis of a realtime teledermatology service in northern Norway.

T S Bergmo1.   

Abstract

Realtime teledermatology has been a routine service provided by the University Hospital of Tromsø to a primary-care centre in Kirkenes since 1989. The cost of the teledermatology service was compared with the costs of three alternative methods of treatment for the patients. The first was a combination of a visiting service and patient travel to hospital. The second was patient travel to the nearest secondary-care centre. The third was a locally employed dermatologist. At the actual 1998 workload of 375 patients, the total cost of teledermatology was NKr470,780, while the three alternatives cost NKr880,530, NKr1,635,075 and NKr958,660, respectively. Analysis of the unit costs showed that the realtime teledermatology service, including local phototherapy, was less costly than the three alternatives for annual workloads above 195 patients per year. A sensitivity analysis showed that the results were robust to changes in the assumptions about the cost structure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11070588     DOI: 10.1258/1357633001935905

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Telemed Telecare        ISSN: 1357-633X            Impact factor:   6.184


  8 in total

Review 1.  Recent advances: Telemedicine.

Authors:  R Wootton
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-09-08

2.  [Teledermatology versus consultations--a comparative study of 120 consultations].

Authors:  F E Herrmann; K Sönnichsen; A Blum
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 0.751

Review 3.  The empirical foundations of telemedicine interventions for chronic disease management.

Authors:  Rashid L Bashshur; Gary W Shannon; Brian R Smith; Dale C Alverson; Nina Antoniotti; William G Barsan; Noura Bashshur; Edward M Brown; Molly J Coye; Charles R Doarn; Stewart Ferguson; Jim Grigsby; Elizabeth A Krupinski; Joseph C Kvedar; Jonathan Linkous; Ronald C Merrell; Thomas Nesbitt; Ronald Poropatich; Karen S Rheuban; Jay H Sanders; Andrew R Watson; Ronald S Weinstein; Peter Yellowlees
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 3.536

Review 4.  A cost minimisation analysis in teledermatology: model-based approach.

Authors:  Nina Eminović; Marcel G Dijkgraaf; Rosanne M Berghout; Astrid H Prins; Patrick Je Bindels; Nicolette F de Keizer
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  Teledermatology for diagnosing skin cancer in adults.

Authors:  Naomi Chuchu; Jacqueline Dinnes; Yemisi Takwoingi; Rubeta N Matin; Susan E Bayliss; Clare Davenport; Jacqueline F Moreau; Oliver Bassett; Kathie Godfrey; Colette O'Sullivan; Fiona M Walter; Richard Motley; Jonathan J Deeks; Hywel C Williams
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-12-04

6.  The costs and potential savings of a novel telepaediatric service in Queensland.

Authors:  Anthony C Smith; Paul Scuffham; Richard Wootton
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-03-02       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Patient and practitioner satisfaction with tele-dermatology including Australia's indigenous population: A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Emily K Kozera; Anes Yang; Dedee F Murrell
Journal:  Int J Womens Dermatol       Date:  2016-08-09

Review 8.  Determining if Telehealth Can Reduce Health System Costs: Scoping Review.

Authors:  Centaine L Snoswell; Monica L Taylor; Tracy A Comans; Anthony C Smith; Leonard C Gray; Liam J Caffery
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 5.428

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.