Literature DB >> 11069410

Psychosocial morbidity in prostate cancer: II. A comparison of patients and partners.

A M Cliff1, R P MacDonagh.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess psychometrically a new questionnaire for measuring the psychosocial morbidity in patients with prostate cancer and in their partners, and to compare the morbidity of patients and their partners. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A sequential sample of patients with any stage of prostate cancer and attending general urology outpatient clinics was identified. The questionnaire was administered to 135 patients and their partners in their homes. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) questionnaire was also administered to permit construct validation of the new measure. Test-retest reliability was calculated by re-administering the questionnaire to 60 individuals. The hypothetical general cancer distress and social subscales of the questionnaire were also tested for internal consistency. Psychosocial morbidity scores obtained by the patients and partners were compared.
RESULTS: The questionnaire had good test-retest reliability and construct validity when tested against the HADS. The general cancer distress and social subscales were internally consistent. General cancer distress was highly prevalent and significantly more severe in partners than in patients. There was some degree of general cancer distress in 47% of patients and 76% of partners, whereas severe distress was detected in 11% and 30%, respectively. Social morbidity was limited and of equal severity between the groups. Treatment-related worries and concerns about pain and physical limitation were more common among partners than patients, whereas there was no difference for worries about urinary symptoms. Sexual concerns were the least prevalent and were more of a problem for patients than partners.
CONCLUSION: Psychosocial morbidity in prostate cancer is highly prevalent, not only among patients but particularly among their partners. The new questionnaire showed adequate psychometric properties for use in identifying individuals with significant psychosocial morbidity. Applying the questionnaire should permit emotional and informational support to be targeted at the most vulnerable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11069410     DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.2000.00914.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  57 in total

Review 1.  Quality of life: impact of chronic illness on the partner.

Authors:  J Rees; C O'Boyle; R MacDonagh
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 2.  Effect of sex and gender on psychosocial aspects of prostate and breast cancer.

Authors:  A Kiss; S Meryn
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-11-03

3.  Partners' long-term appraisal of their caregiving experience, marital satisfaction, sexual satisfaction, and quality of life 2 years after prostate cancer treatment.

Authors:  Janet K Harden; Martin G Sanda; John T Wei; Hossein Yarandi; Larry Hembroff; Jill Hardy; Laurel L Northouse
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.592

4.  Emotion regulation therapy for cancer caregivers-an open trial of a mechanism-targeted approach to addressing caregiver distress.

Authors:  Allison J Applebaum; Aliza A Panjwani; Kara Buda; Mia S O'Toole; Michael A Hoyt; Adam Garcia; David M Fresco; Douglas S Mennin
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  Racial differences in social support and coping among family caregivers of patients with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Anissa I Vines; Zewditu Demissie
Journal:  J Psychosoc Oncol       Date:  2013

6.  The Effects of Social Support on Health-Related Quality of Life of Patients with Metastatic Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Giuseppe Colloca; Pasquale Colloca
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 2.037

7.  Quality of life in partners of patients with cancer.

Authors:  Corinna Bergelt; Uwe Koch; Corinna Petersen
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2008-05-06       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Cancer-related communication, relationship intimacy, and psychological distress among couples coping with localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Sharon Manne; Hoda Badr; Talia Zaider; Christian Nelson; David Kissane
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2009-12-06       Impact factor: 4.442

9.  Proxy assessment of quality of life in patients with prostate cancer: how accurate are partners and urologists?

Authors:  R Pearcy; D Waldron; C O'Boyle; R MacDonagh
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  Beating the blues after cancer: randomised controlled trial of a tele-based psychological intervention for high distress patients and carers.

Authors:  Suzanne K Chambers; Afaf Girgis; Stefano Occhipinti; Sandy Hutchison; Jane Turner; Rob Carter; Jeff Dunn
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.