Literature DB >> 1106935

Superior bioavailability of digoxin solution in capsules.

G I Mallis, D H Schmidt, J Lindenbaum.   

Abstract

The bioavailability of various formulations of digoxin was assessed after single and multiple doses in a series of crossover studies in human volunteers. Digoxin tablets that were 97% dissolved in 1 hr in vitro were not significantly better absorbed than tablets with a dissolution rate of 78%. A solution given in capsule form had greater bioavailability than tablets of 97% dissolution rate; serum and urinary glycoside levels after 0.4 mg doses of the encapsulated solution were similar to those attained after 0.5 mg doses of tablets with dissolution rates of 78% and 97%. The bioavailability of the solution in capsule form exceeded that of equal doses of the same solution given as a liquid or that of a standard elixir. No increase in gastrointestinal or cardiac toxicity was detected. Inter- and intrasubject variation in bioavailability was not decreased. Above a certain level, dissolution rate is no longer the limiting factor in digoxin absorption. The mechanism of the enhanced bioavailability of concentrated liquid digoxin in capsule form remains to be determined. Such a preparation deserves further consideration as a possible replacement for digoxin tablets.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1975        PMID: 1106935     DOI: 10.1002/cpt1975186761

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther        ISSN: 0009-9236            Impact factor:   6.875


  11 in total

1.  [Isomerisation and bioavailability of beta- and alpha-acetyldigoxin (author's transl)].

Authors:  N Rietbrock; H F Vöhringer; J Kuhlmann; K Maertin
Journal:  Klin Wochenschr       Date:  1977-07-01

2.  Comparison of the in vitro and in vivo release of digoxin from four different soft gelatin capsule formulations.

Authors:  J G Wagner; R G Stoll; D J Weidler; J W Ayres; M R Hallmark; E Sakmar; A Yacobi
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1979-04

Review 3.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of digoxin 1980.

Authors:  J K Aronson
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1980 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.447

4.  A standard approach to compiling clinical pharmacokinetic data.

Authors:  L B Sheiner; L Z Benet; L A Pagliaro
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1981-02

5.  Drug interactions with digoxin.

Authors:  D D Brown; R Spector; R P Juhl
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  Influence of soft gelatin on digoxin absorption.

Authors:  J O'Grady; B F Johnson; C Bye; G A Sabey
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 4.335

7.  The comparability of dosage regimens of Lanoxin tablets and Lanoxicaps.

Authors:  B F Johnson; G Smith; J French
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1977-04       Impact factor: 4.335

8.  The comparative bioavailability of Lanoxin tablets and Lanoxicaps with and without sorbitol.

Authors:  J O'Grady; B F Johnson; C Bye; J French
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1978-12-18       Impact factor: 2.953

9.  The bioavailability of digoxin from three oral formulations measured by a specific h.p.l.c. assay.

Authors:  A F Cohen; R Kroon; H C Schoemaker; D D Breimer; A Van Vliet-Verbeek; H C Brandenburg
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 4.335

10.  Bioavailability of digoxin tablets in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  C H Lee; Y J Park; C D Sands; D W Jones; J M Trang
Journal:  Arch Pharm Res       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 4.946

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.