Literature DB >> 11068966

Toward the DSM-V: the Withdrawal-Gate Model versus the DSM-IV in the diagnosis of alcohol abuse and dependence.

J Langenbucher1, C S Martin, E Labouvie, P M Sanjuan, L Bavly, N K Pollock.   

Abstract

The Diagtnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed.; DSM-IV; American Psychiatric Association, 1994) classifies as dependent many cases of mild alcohol problems. DSM-IV diagnoses have modest relationships with predictive and some concurrent validators and often improperly sequence the onset of abuse versus dependence, perhaps due to insufficient emphasis on physiological features. Testing reliability, syndrome prevalence, syndrome sequencing, and concurrent and predictive validity, this study contrasted the DSM-IV with the Withdrawal-Gate Model (WGM), in which alcohol withdrawal is necessary and sufficient for the dependence diagnosis. Clinical samples of adults (baseline n = 318) and adolescents (baseline n = 214) meeting abuse or dependence were assessed for DSM-IV alcohol symptoms and external measures of problem severity and reinterviewed at 6 (adults) and 12 months (adults and adolescents). Among DSM-IV dependent cases, the WGM shifted 32% of adults and 80% of adolescents to the abuse category, making both categories more symptomatically severe, but had a negligible effect on the prevalence of total alcohol diagnoses. The WGM was more reliable than the DSM-IV and temporally sequenced abuse before dependence in a greater number of cases. The WGM was superior to the DSM-IV in concurrent and predictive validity on most measures. Future diagnostic systems may be more reliable and valid if they require evidence of withdrawal for substance dependence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11068966

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol        ISSN: 0022-006X


  26 in total

1.  Association of alcohol dehydrogenase genes with alcohol-related phenotypes in a Native American community sample.

Authors:  Ian R Gizer; Howard J Edenberg; David A Gilder; Kirk C Wilhelmsen; Cindy L Ehlers
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 3.455

2.  It's the algorithm! Why differential rates of chronicity and comorbidity are not evidence for the validity of the abuse-dependence distinction.

Authors:  Alvaro Vergés; Douglas Steinley; Timothy J Trull; Kenneth J Sher
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2010-11

3.  Characterizing alcohol dependence: transitions during young and middle adulthood.

Authors:  Kristina M Jackson; Susan E O'Neill; Kenneth J Sher
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.157

4.  Item response theory analysis of DSM-IV cannabis abuse and dependence criteria in adolescents.

Authors:  Christie A Hartman; Heather Gelhorn; Thomas J Crowley; Joseph T Sakai; Michael Stallings; Susan E Young; Soo Hyun Rhee; Robin Corley; John K Hewitt; Christian J Hopfer
Journal:  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 8.829

5.  Meta-analysis of DSM alcohol use disorder criteria severities: structural consistency is only 'skin deep'.

Authors:  S P Lane; D Steinley; K J Sher
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 7.723

6.  Algorithm Analysis of the DSM-5 Alcohol Withdrawal Symptom.

Authors:  Christopher S Martin; Alvaro Vergés; James W Langenbucher; Andrew Littlefield; Tammy Chung; Duncan B Clark; Kenneth J Sher
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 3.455

7.  Limits of Current Approaches to Diagnosis Severity Based on Criterion Counts: An Example with DSM-5 Alcohol Use Disorder.

Authors:  Sean P Lane; Kenneth J Sher
Journal:  Clin Psychol Sci       Date:  2014-11-26

8.  Reliability of use, abuse, and dependence of four types of inhalants in adolescents and young adults.

Authors:  Ty A Ridenour; Bethany C Bray; Linda B Cottler
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2007-06-18       Impact factor: 4.492

Review 9.  Alcohol use disorders in adolescents: epidemiology, diagnosis, psychosocial interventions, and pharmacological treatment.

Authors:  Duncan B Clark; Oscar Bukstein; Jack Cornelius
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.022

10.  The prognostic implications of DSM-IV abuse criteria in drinking adolescents.

Authors:  Marc A Schuckit; George P Danko; Tom L Smith; Laura J Bierut; Kathleen K Bucholz; Howard J Edenberg; Victor Hesselbrock; John Kramer; John I Nurnberger; Ryan Trim; Rhonda Allen; Sara Kreikebaum; Briana Hinga
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2008-05-13       Impact factor: 4.492

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.