Literature DB >> 11068838

Diagnostic quality in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: comparison between lodixanol and lopromide.

D F Martin1, R E England, T Rösch, E Biehl, B Jeschke, D Heldwein, A Klauser, A Klaveness, D Kristoffersen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: The contrast medium for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) must produce adequate images, whilst keeping the risk of complications to a minimum. There is a theoretical reason to suppose that a dimeric isosmolar medium may be superior to a monomeric hyperosmolar medium. We have compared two such media in a triple-centre double-blind randomized study on patients referred with a clinical indication for ERCP. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 160 patients were randomly allocated to either lodixanol or lopromide. Assessments were made of the quality of images and the complications encountered.
RESULTS: A total of 151 patients were evaluated. Apart from a trend towards better diagnostic quality for main pancreatic duct imaging with lodixanol, there were no differences between the two groups. The overall frequencies of adverse events were similar
CONCLUSIONS: lodixanol is a safe and effective water-soluble contrast medium for ERCP, comparable to lopromide, but despite theoretical advantages lodixanol has no clear practical benefit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11068838     DOI: 10.1055/s-2000-7707

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  3 in total

1.  Role of osmolality of contrast media in the development of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a metanalysis.

Authors:  Suku George; Arvind A Kulkarni; Gary Stevens; Chris E Forsmark; Peter Draganov
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Effects of contrast media on the hepato-pancreato-biliary system.

Authors:  Omer Topcu; Atilla Kurt; Isilay Nadir; Sema Arici; Ayhan Koyuncu; Cengiz Aydin
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Comparison of allergic adverse effects and contrast enhancement between iodixanol and iopromide.

Authors:  Farideh Gharekhanloo; Saadat Torabian
Journal:  Iran J Radiol       Date:  2012-06-30       Impact factor: 0.212

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.