Literature DB >> 11068289

Gleason score 7 prostate cancer: a heterogeneous entity? Correlation with pathologic parameters and disease-free survival.

W A Sakr1, M V Tefilli, D J Grignon, M Banerjee, J Dey, E L Gheiler, R Tiguert, I J Powell, D P Wood.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Gleason score 7, in different proportions of grades 3 and 4, is the score most frequently assigned to prostate cancer in our radical prostatectomy specimens (RPSs). We correlated the major grade component of score 7 tumors with clinicopathologic parameters and disease-free survival.
METHODS: All Gleason score 7 RPSs were classified as having a major grade of 3 or 4 carcinoma. The two groups were compared according to patient age, race, serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, clinical and pathologic stage, tumor volume, and biochemical recurrence.
RESULTS: Of the 534 patients analyzed, 356 and 178 had major grade 3 or 4 tumors, respectively. Compared with patients with 3+4 tumors, those with 4+3 had significantly more advanced clinical and pathologic stages, larger tumor volume, higher preoperative PSA levels, and older age and a higher proportion were African American (P <0.05 for all above parameters). With a mean follow-up of 34.6 months, patients with 3+4 tumors experienced lower rates of PSA recurrence than did those with 4+3 tumors (P = 0.0021). Furthermore, for the subset of patients with organ-confined disease, multivariable analysis that included race, age, clinical stage, preoperative PSA level, tumor volume, and major grade component found only the latter to be a significant predictor of recurrence, with patients who had major grade 4 component tumors experiencing a higher incidence of PSA recurrence than those with major grade 3 tumors (P = 0.012).
CONCLUSIONS: The major grade 4 component in Gleason score 7 carcinoma indicates a higher likelihood of biochemical recurrence, particularly for the increasing proportion of patients with organ-confined disease after radical prostatectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11068289     DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(00)00791-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  32 in total

1.  [The 2014 consensus conference of the ISUP on Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma].

Authors:  G Kristiansen; L Egevad; M Amin; B Delahunt; J R Srigley; P A Humphrey; J I Epstein
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.011

2.  Differential expression of peroxiredoxins in prostate cancer: consistent upregulation of PRDX3 and PRDX4.

Authors:  Anamika Basu; Hiya Banerjee; Heather Rojas; Shannalee R Martinez; Sourav Roy; Zhenyu Jia; Michael B Lilly; Marino De León; Carlos A Casiano
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 4.104

Review 3.  Current practice of Gleason grading of prostate carcinoma.

Authors:  Antonio Lopez-Beltran; Gregor Mikuz; Rafael J Luque; Roberta Mazzucchelli; Rodolfo Montironi
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2005-11-23       Impact factor: 4.064

4.  Ki67 staining index and neuroendocrine differentiation aggravate adverse prognostic parameters in prostate cancer and are characterized by negligible inter-observer variability.

Authors:  Sven Gunia; Knut Albrecht; Stefan Koch; Thomas Herrmann; Thorsten Ecke; Volker Loy; Jörg Linke; Michael Siegsmund; Matthias May
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-04-05       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 5.  Biomarker research in prostate cancer--towards utility, not futility.

Authors:  Sheng Fei Oon; Stephen R Pennington; John M Fitzpatrick; R William G Watson
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 6.  PET and PET/CT with radiolabeled choline in prostate cancer: a critical reappraisal of 20 years of clinical studies.

Authors:  Giampiero Giovacchini; Elisabetta Giovannini; Rossella Leoncini; Mattia Riondato; Andrea Ciarmiello
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  The effect of Rapid Access Prostate Clinics on the outcomes of Gleason 7 prostate cancer: does earlier diagnosis lead to better outcomes?

Authors:  M P Broe; J C Forde; M S Inder; D J Galvin; D W Mulvin; D M Quinlan
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 1.568

8.  Impact of the extent of extraprostatic extension defined by Epstein's method in patients with negative surgical margins and negative lymph node invasion.

Authors:  T Maubon; N Branger; C Bastide; G Lonjon; K-A Harvey-Bryan; P Validire; S Giusiano; D Rossi; X Cathelineau; F Rozet
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 5.554

9.  Risk stratification of men with Gleason score 7 to 10 tumors by primary and secondary Gleason score: results from the SEARCH database.

Authors:  David E Kang; Nicholas J Fitzsimons; Joseph C Presti; Christopher J Kane; Martha K Terris; William J Aronson; Christopher L Amling; Stephen J Freedland
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  Application of histone modification in the risk prediction of the biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Li-Xin Zhou; Tao Li; Yi-Ran Huang; Jian-Jun Sha; Peng Sun; Dong Li
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2009-11-23       Impact factor: 3.285

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.