| Literature DB >> 11067877 |
H Ema1, H Takano, K Sudo, H Nakauchi.
Abstract
Little is known about how hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) self-renew. We studied the regeneration of HSCs in culture. Effects of various cytokines on cell division of CD34(-/low) c-Kit(+)Sca-1(+) lineage marker-negative (CD34(-)KSL) bone marrow cells of the mouse were first evaluated in serum-free single cell culture. We then performed a competitive repopulation assay on divided cells to ask if such cell division involved self-renewal of HSCs. In the presence of stem cell factor (SCF), thrombopoietin (TPO) induced a first cell division of CD34(-)KSL cells more efficiently than did interleukin (IL)-3 or IL-6. Multilineage repopulating cells were detected in a significant proportion of cells derived from single cells in culture with TPO and SCF, although this culture condition led to a substantial decrease in HSC number. These regenerated repopulating cells could be further transplanted into secondary recipients. When paired daughter cells were separately studied, one of a pair gave rise to repopulating cells with self-renewal potential, suggesting asymmetric self-renewal division. This study provides evidence that one HSC regenerates at least one HSC in culture.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2000 PMID: 11067877 PMCID: PMC2193353 DOI: 10.1084/jem.192.9.1281
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Exp Med ISSN: 0022-1007 Impact factor: 14.307
Figure 1Cell division and colony formation of single CD34−KSL cells. A single-cell culture was performed in the presence of the indicated cytokines. The histogram shows the mean percentages of cells that underwent cell division at least once and of cells that gave rise to colonies during 2 wk of culture.
Figure 2Cumulative percentage of first cell division. Individual CD34−KSL cells were incubated in the presence of the indicated cytokines. A first day on which two or more cells were observed was recorded for each single cell. The cumulative distribution of first cell division among the cells that divided within a week is presented.
Stem Cell Activity in Cells Derived from a Single CD34−KSL Cell
| Cytokine | Culture period | No. transplanted cells | No. positive mice (%) | Chimerism in positive individuals |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| d | % | |||
| none | 0 | 1 | 7/17 (41.2) | 1.3, 1.3, 3.0, 4.5, 8.5, 15.0, 23.7 |
| SCF + IL-3 | 3 | 2 | 2/19 (10.5) | 5.3, 19.4 |
| SCF + IL-6 | 3 | 2 | 0/15 (0.0) | 0.0 |
| SCF + TPO | 3 | 1 | 5/20 (25.0) | 1.2, 2.0, 5.9. 6.1, 7.6 |
| 3 | 2 | 3/10 (30.0) | 2.7, 2.7, 3.0 | |
| 6 | 2–7 | 7/47 (14.9) | 1.6, 3.0, 4.9, 6.5, 8.9, 16.7, 61.1 | |
| 6 | 9–16 | 2/29 (6.9) | 2.1, 5.0 |
CD34−KSL bone marrow cells were sorted at one cell per well. A single cell was mixed with 2 × 105 bone marrow competitor cells and transplanted into an irradiated mouse. A single cell was also incubated in the presence of the indicated cytokines. A cell underwent cell division in culture and gave rise to two or more cells. Clonal cells in culture were transplanted along with 2 × 105 competitor cells. Blood cells of the recipients were analyzed for the presence of cells derived from a single cell at 12 wk after transplantation. The number of mice reconstituted with single cells or their progeny (positive mice) is the numerator; the number of mice transplanted is the denominator.
Figure 3Frequency of the number of cells derived from single CD34−KSL cells. Single cells gave rise to varying numbers of cells by days 3 and 6 of culture. The histogram shows the distribution of the number of cells produced by single cells.
Figure 4Multilineage reconstitution with cultured cells. One of the best reconstituted cases is shown. An irradiated mouse was transplanted with six cells generated from one cell in culture with SCF and TPO by day 6 of incubation (see Table ). Blood cells of the recipients were analyzed for the presence of donor-derived cells 12 wk after transplantation (A). Secondary transplantation with bone marrow cells of this mouse resulted in multilineage reconstitution shown by analysis 16 wk after secondary transplantation (B). The cells derived from test and competitor donor cells (B6-Ly5.1 and F1 cells) were gated to display reconstitution in myeloid and B and T lymphoid lineages.
Secondary Transplantation of Bone Marrow Cells Reconstituted with Clonal Cultured Cells
| Primary recipients | Secondary recipients | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Percent chimerism | |||||||
| Mouse no. | No. cells injected | No. BM cells (% Ly5.1) | Positive mice | All WBCs | Myeloid | B lymphoid | T lymphoid |
| 1 | 3 | 3.6 × 107 (14.1) | 4/8 | 7.4 ± 4.2 ( | 5.2 ± 2.0 ( | 4.2 ± 2.4 ( | 7.9 ± 2.9 ( |
| 2 | 4 | 4.0 × 107 (6.3) | 0/10 | – | – | – | – |
| 3 | 4 | 3.0 × 107 (6.5) | 10/10 | 18.5 ± 11.7 ( | 27.3 ± 15.1 ( | 12.5 ± 8.9 ( | 14.9 ± 13.9 ( |
| 4 | 6 | 2.6 × 107 (63.0) | 9/9 | 16.7 ± 10.8 ( | 5.4 ± 2.6 ( | 13.4 ± 6.2 ( | 38.3 ± 22.0 ( |
At 20 wk after primary transplantation, bone marrow cells were collected from both tibiae and femora of mice reconstituted with cultured cells of single cell origin. 2 × 106 cells were transferred into each secondary recipient. At 20 wk after secondary transplantation, peripheral blood cells of the recipients were analyzed for percent chimerism of cells derived from a single cell. WBCs, white blood cells.
Transplantation of Paired Daughter Cells
| Cells transplanted | Positive cases | Percent chimerism |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 2/14 mice | 2.1, 5.5 |
| 2 of 4 (paired daughters) | +,− pair: 2/13 +,+ pair: 0/13 | 8.6, 61.4 |
Four cells generated from a single cell by day 3 were transplanted. When a single cell gave rise to paired daughter cells at day 2 of culture, two cells were separated by micromanipulation. Two cells that were further generated from each paired daughter cell at day 3 were individually transplanted into an irradiated mouse. Peripheral blood cells were analyzed for the presence of test donor-derived cells at 20 wk after transplantation. The number of mice reconstituted is shown when 4 cells were transplanted, as is the number of positive pairs when 2 paired daughter-derived cells were transplanted. +,− pair, one of the two recipients was reconstituted. +,+ pair, both recipients were reconstituted.
Secondary Transplantation of Bone Marrow Cells Reconstituted with One of the Paired Daughter Cells
| Primary recipients | Secondary recipients | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Percent chimerism | ||||||
| Mouse no. | No. BM cells (% Ly5.1) | Positive mice | All WBCs | Myeloid | B lymphoid | T lymphoid |
| 5 | 3.5 × 107 (84.0) | 10/10 | 64.9 ± 21.1 ( | 36.4 ± 19.5( | 60.2 ± 15.5 ( | 63.7 ± 21.2 ( |
| 6 | 4.8 × 107 (10.0) | 3/10 | 11.1 ± 6.2( | 4.4 ± 1.6 ( | 9.4 ± 8.1 ( | 21.3 ± 8.5( |
Two mice successfully reconstituted with daughter cell–derived cells (see Table ) served as donors for secondary transplantation. The indicated numbers of bone marrow (BM) cells were collected from these mice 20 wk after transplantation. Percent Ly5.1 shows the percentage of daughter cell–derived cells among bone marrow cells. In both cases, 2 × 106 bone marrow cells were transferred into each of 10 lethally irradiated mice. Peripheral blood cells of the recipients were analyzed 20 wk after secondary transplantation. WBCs, white blood cells.