T S Rector1, P J Venus, A J Laine. 1. Center for Health Care Policy and Evaluation (MN008-W109) (TSR and PJV) and Medicaid Programs (MN012-S214) (AJL), UnitedHealth Group, Minneapolis, MN, USA. thomas_s_rector@uhc.com
Abstract
CONTEXT: Emergency department services may be used more appropriately if laypeople's knowledge of managing minor medical problems could be enhanced, especially since Medicaid applies a "prudent layperson" standard for providing access to emergency care. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of mailing a booklet, First Look, that informed Medicaid beneficiaries about care of common nonurgent conditions and encouraged use of alternatives to emergency care including care by office-based physicians, telephonic nursing assistance, and self-care. STUDY DESIGN: A randomized, parallel group study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Administrative data from 2 health plans serving urban Medicaid populations were used to identify households with a history of emergency department utilization (n = 3101 and n = 3822). Within each health plan, households were randomly assigned to receive First Look. The number of emergency department visits during 6.5 months of follow-up was the primary study endpoint. RESULTS: Compared with controls, 1% fewer members of households that were mailed First Look visited an emergency department in each health plan (23% versus 24% in Plan A; 27% versus 28% in Plan B). The 95% confidence intervals on the observed differences were -3% to 1% and -4% to 1% in Plans A and B, respectively. The proportion of emergency department visits for conditions discussed in First Look was not significantly reduced in households that were mailed the booklet (62% versus 60% in Plan A and 51% versus 48% in Plan B). CONCLUSION: Mailing First Look to Medicaid beneficiaries did not have a significant effect on use of emergency departments. Medicaid programs need to evaluate other, perhaps more multifaceted, interventions to promote appropriate use of emergency departments.
RCT Entities:
CONTEXT: Emergency department services may be used more appropriately if laypeople's knowledge of managing minor medical problems could be enhanced, especially since Medicaid applies a "prudent layperson" standard for providing access to emergency care. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of mailing a booklet, First Look, that informed Medicaid beneficiaries about care of common nonurgent conditions and encouraged use of alternatives to emergency care including care by office-based physicians, telephonic nursing assistance, and self-care. STUDY DESIGN: A randomized, parallel group study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Administrative data from 2 health plans serving urban Medicaid populations were used to identify households with a history of emergency department utilization (n = 3101 and n = 3822). Within each health plan, households were randomly assigned to receive First Look. The number of emergency department visits during 6.5 months of follow-up was the primary study endpoint. RESULTS: Compared with controls, 1% fewer members of households that were mailed First Look visited an emergency department in each health plan (23% versus 24% in Plan A; 27% versus 28% in Plan B). The 95% confidence intervals on the observed differences were -3% to 1% and -4% to 1% in Plans A and B, respectively. The proportion of emergency department visits for conditions discussed in First Look was not significantly reduced in households that were mailed the booklet (62% versus 60% in Plan A and 51% versus 48% in Plan B). CONCLUSION: Mailing First Look to Medicaid beneficiaries did not have a significant effect on use of emergency departments. Medicaid programs need to evaluate other, perhaps more multifaceted, interventions to promote appropriate use of emergency departments.
Authors: Meghan May; David C Brousseau; David A Nelson; Kathryn E Flynn; Michael S Wolf; Bryn Lepley; Andrea K Morrison Journal: Acad Pediatr Date: 2017-06-16 Impact factor: 3.107
Authors: Andrea K Morrison; Matthew P Myrvik; David C Brousseau; Raymond G Hoffmann; Rachel M Stanley Journal: Acad Pediatr Date: 2013-03-05 Impact factor: 3.107