Literature DB >> 11066485

Commentary: quality, costs, privacy and electronic medical data.

D W Bates1.   

Abstract

While agreeing that proper confidentiality measures are necessary when handling patient records, author discusses finding a balance between privacy and the benefits of using patient data to improve quality and to control costs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Health Care and Public Health; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh：

Year:  1997        PMID： 11066485     DOI： 10.1111/j.1748-720x.1997.tb01886.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Law Med Ethics        ISSN： 1073-1105            Impact factor:   1.718


  5 in total

1.  Public standards and patients' control: how to keep electronic medical records accessible but private.

Authors:  K D Mandl; P Szolovits; I S Kohane
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-02-03

2.  Challenges to EHR implementation in electronic- versus paper-based office practices.

Authors:  Stephanie O Zandieh; Kahyun Yoon-Flannery; Gilad J Kuperman; Daniel J Langsam; Daniel Hyman; Rainu Kaushal
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-03-28       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Consumers' perceptions about and use of the internet for personal health records and health information exchange: analysis of the 2007 Health Information National Trends Survey.

Authors:  Kuang-Yi Wen; Gary Kreps; Fang Zhu; Suzanne Miller
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2010-12-18       Impact factor: 5.428

4.  Patients' attitudes toward electronic health information exchange: qualitative study.

Authors:  Steven R Simon; J Stewart Evans; Alison Benjamin; David Delano; David W Bates
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 5.428

5.  The quality case for information technology in healthcare.

Authors:  David W Bates
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2002-10-23       Impact factor: 2.796
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.