Literature DB >> 11064977

Total knee arthroplasty in patients 40 years of age and younger with osteoarthritis.

J H Lonner1, S Hershman, M Mont, P A Lotke.   

Abstract

The results of 32 total knee arthroplasties performed for osteoarthritis in 32 patients who were 40 years of age or younger are reviewed. At a mean followup of 7.9 years (minimum, 5 years), the Knee Society knee scores increased from an average of 47 to 88 points, and the function scores increased from 45 to 70 points. Overall, Knee Society knee scores were considered good or excellent in 82% of patients (26 knees) and fair or poor in 18% (six knees). Postoperative function scores were good or excellent in only 40% (13 knees). The average postoperative flexion arc was 110 degrees. If patients involved in worker's compensation cases are excluded from analysis, the results improved substantially, with range of motion averaging 113 degrees, and Knee Society knee scores and function scores averaging 92 points and 77 points, respectively. Excluding the five patients involved in workmen's compensation cases, knee scores were good or excellent in 91% of patients (25 knees) and function scores were good or excellent in 50% of patients (14 knees). Three revisions were performed for aseptic failure; one additional patient has radiographic evidence of tibial loosening, representing an aseptic failure rate of 12.5% at 8 years. Although slightly higher than observed in older patients, this failure rate still may be considered acceptable for this population of patients with severely affected knees who are not considered candidates for nonarthroplasty surgery. Despite a slightly higher tendency for aseptic failures in this group of patients, cemented total knee arthroplasty may provide some patients younger than 40 years of age with severe debilitating and recalcitrant osteoarthrosis, an important option with reasonable mid- and long-term results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11064977     DOI: 10.1097/00003086-200011000-00012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  37 in total

Review 1.  Surgical treatment for early osteoarthritis. Part II: allografts and concurrent procedures.

Authors:  A H Gomoll; G Filardo; F K Almqvist; W D Bugbee; M Jelic; J C Monllau; G Puddu; W G Rodkey; P Verdonk; R Verdonk; S Zaffagnini; M Marcacci
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  What is the evidence for total knee arthroplasty in young patients?: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  James A Keeney; Selena Eunice; Gail Pashos; Rick W Wright; John C Clohisy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-09-03       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  [Results for endoprosthetic care in patients younger than 50 years].

Authors:  J Ziegler; M Amlang; M Bottesi; S Kirschner; W-C Witzleb; K-P Günther
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 4.  Larger range of motion and increased return to activity, but higher revision rates following unicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty in patients under 65: a systematic review.

Authors:  Laura J Kleeblad; Jelle P van der List; Hendrik A Zuiderbaan; Andrew D Pearle
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Comparable outcomes after total knee arthroplasty in patients under 55 years than in older patients: a matched prospective study with minimum follow-up of 10 years.

Authors:  Alejandro Lizaur-Utrilla; Daniel Martinez-Mendez; Francisco A Miralles-Muñoz; Luis Marco-Gómez; Fernando A Lopez-Prats
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-12-27       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Similar survival between screw cementless and cemented tibial components in young patients with osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Alejandro Lizaur-Utrilla; Francisco A Miralles-Muñoz; Fernando A Lopez-Prats
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 7.  [Partial and complete joint transplantation with fresh osteochondral allografts-the FLOCSAT concept].

Authors:  C Krettek; J-D Clausen; N Bruns; C Neunaber
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 1.000

8.  The use of osteochondral allografts in the management of cartilage defects.

Authors:  Marco Demange; Andreas H Gomoll
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2012-09

9.  Younger age increases the risk of early prosthesis failure following primary total knee replacement for osteoarthritis. A follow-up study of 32,019 total knee replacements in the Finnish Arthroplasty Register.

Authors:  Jaakko Julin; Esa Jämsen; Timo Puolakka; Yrjö T Konttinen; Teemu Moilanen
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.717

10.  Do fresh osteochondral allografts successfully treat femoral condyle lesions?

Authors:  Yadin D Levy; Simon Görtz; Pamela A Pulido; Julie C McCauley; William D Bugbee
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.