T Meyer1, S Merkel, J Goehl, W Hohenberger. 1. Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Erlangen, Germany. meyer@chir.imed.uni-erlangen.de
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Manifestation of distant metastases in melanoma patients commonly indicates a poor prognosis. The aim of the current study was to examine the role of surgical treatment in these patients. METHODS: Data from 444 patients with distant melanoma metastases were gathered prospectively from January 1978 through December 1997. Characteristics of the primary tumor, time until the first occurrence of distant metastases, frequency and site of distant metastases, surgical therapy, and survival were evaluated by univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Histology, Breslow thickness, Clark level, and pT and pN categories (UICC 1997) significantly influenced the median interval from initial diagnosis to manifestation of distant metastases. The most common single localization was the lung (n = 83), followed by distant lymph node (n = 79), and skin metastases (n = 51). One hundred seventy-four patients received surgical treatment (39%) and 111 (25%) patients received surgical treatment with curative resection (R0, UICC 1997), most frequently in distant lymph node or skin metastases (57% and 59%, respectively). Median survival time and 2-year survival rate for all patients were 7 months and 15.8%, respectively, 17 months and 36.1% following curative resection, 6 months and 12.7% after incomplete resection (n = 63) (P < 0.0001). Conservatively treated patients survived for a median of only 4 months with a 2-year survival of 8.1%. Multivariate survival analysis showed localization of the primary tumor (head/neck/trunk vs. extremities), the number of involved sites, and surgical therapy to be independent prognostic factors. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical therapy of distant metastases was most beneficial when complete removal of metastatic tissue was achieved. Selection of patients for surgical excision should be determined by individual patient indications. Copyright 2000 American Cancer Society.
BACKGROUND: Manifestation of distant metastases in melanomapatients commonly indicates a poor prognosis. The aim of the current study was to examine the role of surgical treatment in these patients. METHODS: Data from 444 patients with distant melanoma metastases were gathered prospectively from January 1978 through December 1997. Characteristics of the primary tumor, time until the first occurrence of distant metastases, frequency and site of distant metastases, surgical therapy, and survival were evaluated by univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Histology, Breslow thickness, Clark level, and pT and pN categories (UICC 1997) significantly influenced the median interval from initial diagnosis to manifestation of distant metastases. The most common single localization was the lung (n = 83), followed by distant lymph node (n = 79), and skin metastases (n = 51). One hundred seventy-four patients received surgical treatment (39%) and 111 (25%) patients received surgical treatment with curative resection (R0, UICC 1997), most frequently in distant lymph node or skin metastases (57% and 59%, respectively). Median survival time and 2-year survival rate for all patients were 7 months and 15.8%, respectively, 17 months and 36.1% following curative resection, 6 months and 12.7% after incomplete resection (n = 63) (P < 0.0001). Conservatively treated patients survived for a median of only 4 months with a 2-year survival of 8.1%. Multivariate survival analysis showed localization of the primary tumor (head/neck/trunk vs. extremities), the number of involved sites, and surgical therapy to be independent prognostic factors. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical therapy of distant metastases was most beneficial when complete removal of metastatic tissue was achieved. Selection of patients for surgical excision should be determined by individual patient indications. Copyright 2000 American Cancer Society.
Authors: J Harrison Howard; John F Thompson; Nicola Mozzillo; Omgo E Nieweg; Harald J Hoekstra; Daniel F Roses; Vernon K Sondak; Douglas S Reintgen; Mohammed Kashani-Sabet; Constantine P Karakousis; Brendon J Coventry; William G Kraybill; B Mark Smithers; Robert Elashoff; Stacey L Stern; Alistair J Cochran; Mark B Faries; Donald L Morton Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2012-05-31 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Marion T Harris; Salvatore U Berlangieri; Jonathan S Cebon; Ian D Davis; Andrew M Scott Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2005 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: Danielle M Bello; Katherine S Panageas; Travis Hollmann; Alexander N Shoushtari; Parisa Momtaz; Paul B Chapman; Michael A Postow; Margaret K Callahan; Jedd D Wolchok; Mary S Brady; Daniel G Coit; Charlotte E Ariyan Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2019-12-17 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Annika M Hohnheiser; Olaf Gefeller; Jonas Göhl; Gerold Schuler; Werner Hohenberger; Susanne Merkel Journal: World J Surg Date: 2011-03 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Jatinder Goyal; Evan J Lipson; Neda Rezaee; Barish H Edil; Rich Schulick; Christopher L Wolfgang; Ralph H Hruban; Emmanuel S Antonarakis Journal: J Gastrointest Cancer Date: 2012-09
Authors: J C Hassel; A Sucker; L Edler; H Kurzen; I Moll; C Stresemann; K Spieth; C Mauch; K Rass; R Dummer; D Schadendorf Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2010-08-24 Impact factor: 7.640