Literature DB >> 11064238

Population surveillance for physical violence among adult men and women, Montana 1998.

T S Harwell1, M R Spence.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Few epidemiologic studies of physical violence or intimate partner violence provide population-based surveillance data.
OBJECTIVES: To estimate the prevalence and describe the characteristics associated with physical violence among adult men and women in the past year.
METHODS: A random sample of Montana households was contacted via the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System telephone survey in 1998 (N=1804).
RESULTS: Five percent of men (39/787) and 3% of women (33/1017) reported experiencing physical violence in the past year. Among respondents reporting physical violence in the past year, women were more likely than men to report that the perpetrator was a current/former partner (58% vs 10%, p</=0.05). Women were also more likely to report that the most recent incident occurred in their homes (58%) as compared to men (13%, p>/=0.05). Men who reported experiencing physical violence in the past year were more likely to be younger and not to be living with a current partner. Women who reported experiencing physical violence in the past year were more likely to be younger, not currently living with a partner, have no health insurance, and have more days with mental health problems in the past month.
CONCLUSIONS: Recent physical violence is common for both men and women; however, the perpetrators, locations, and demographic characteristics differ. Further study is needed to better understand the factors associated with physical violence among men and women in the context of designing and implementing appropriate interventions to reduce violence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11064238     DOI: 10.1016/s0749-3797(00)00240-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  6 in total

1.  The association between length of stay in Canada and intimate partner violence among immigrant women.

Authors:  Ilene Hyman; Tonia Forte; Janice Du Mont; Sarah Romans; Marsha M Cohen
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Ascertainment of intimate partner violence using two abuse measurement frameworks.

Authors:  A E Bonomi; R S Thompson; M Anderson; F P Rivara; V L Holt; D Carrell; D P Martin
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.399

3.  What distinguishes unintentional injuries from injuries due to intimate partner violence: a study in Greek ambulatory care settings.

Authors:  E Petridou; A Browne; E Lichter; X Dedoukou; D Alexe; N Dessypris
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.399

4.  Characteristic of victims of family violence seeking care at health centers in Maputo, Mozambique.

Authors:  Eunice Abdul Remane Jethá; Catherine A Lynch; Debra E Houry; Maria Alexendra Rodrigues; Baltazar Chilundo; Scott M Sasser; David W Wright
Journal:  J Emerg Trauma Shock       Date:  2011-07

5.  Using confirmatory factor analysis to explore associated factors of intimate partner violence in a sample of Chinese rural women: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Fengsu Hou; Catherine Cerulli; Marsha N Wittink; Eric D Caine; Peiyuan Qiu
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  "Whose Fault Is It?" How Rural Chinese Women Explain Intimate Partner Violence: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Fengsu Hou; Catherine Cerulli; Marsha N Wittink; Eric D Caine; Peiyuan Qiu
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 4.157

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.