Literature DB >> 11063241

Subjective vs. objective intelligibility of sentences in listeners with hearing loss.

K M Cienkowski1, C Speaks.   

Abstract

The relation between rated intelligibility and correct key word repetitions of sentences was examined in listeners with normal hearing and listeners with hearing loss. Ten lists of 10 CID sentences were arranged in two randomly ordered groups. Listeners were asked to complete two tasks: (1) rate the intelligibility of 50 sentences on a scale of 0 to 100%, and (2) repeat each of the 50 sentences, which were scored as the number of key words repeated correctly. Sentences were presented at five signal-to-noise ratios. The start level for sentence presentation was established using the method of adjustment and the Revised Speech Intelligibility Rating passages. Correlations of rated intelligibility and correct repetition were 0.85 for listeners with normal hearing and 0.86 for listeners with hearing loss. This study confirms the earlier work of Speaks, Parker, Harris, and Kuhl (1972), and the findings demonstrate that listeners with hearing loss preserve the ability to rate the intelligibility of speech.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11063241     DOI: 10.1044/jslhr.4305.1205

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  7 in total

1.  Talker Differences in Clear and Conversational Speech: Perceived Sentence Clarity for Young Adults With Normal Hearing and Older Adults With Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Sarah Hargus Ferguson; Shae D Morgan
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  The influence of frequency-dependent hearing loss to unaided APHAB scores.

Authors:  J Löhler; B Akcicek; B Wollenberg; T Kappe; P Schlattmann; R Schönweiler
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Construct Validity of the Ecological Momentary Assessment in Audiology Research.

Authors:  Yu-Hsiang Wu; Elizabeth Stangl; Xuyang Zhang; Ruth A Bentler
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.664

4.  A Potential Bias in Subjective Ratings of Mental Effort.

Authors:  Travis M Moore; Erin M Picou
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 5.  Variations in the slope of the psychometric functions for speech intelligibility: a systematic survey.

Authors:  Alexandra MacPherson; Michael A Akeroyd
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 3.293

6.  Effects of pedagogical ideology on the perceived loudness and noise levels in preschools.

Authors:  Valdis Jonsdottir; Leena M Rantala; Gudmundur Kr Oskarsson; Eeva Sala
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 0.867

7.  Moderate Reverberation Does Not Increase Subjective Fatigue, Subjective Listening Effort, or Behavioral Listening Effort in School-Aged Children.

Authors:  Erin M Picou; Brianna Bean; Steven C Marcrum; Todd A Ricketts; Benjamin W Y Hornsby
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-08-02
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.