Literature DB >> 1106292

Mammography: a contrary view.

J C Bailar.   

Abstract

Experimental and clinical data on mammography as a tool for population screening are reviewed. The conclusions are that [1] there is good evidence that annual history, physical examination, and mammography can reduce short-term and midrange breast cancer mortality by about one third; [2] the evidence that mammography alone plays a significant role in this reduction is weak and indirect; [4] data on long-term effects of mammography are lacking; [4] no satisfactory investigations of associated radiation hazards have been published; and [5] the possible benefits of mammography have received more emphasis in the clinical literature than have its defects. Promotion of mammography as a general public health measure is premature.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1976        PMID: 1106292     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-84-1-77

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  13 in total

1.  Radiation risks of mammography.

Authors:  E A Sickles
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1976-12

2.  History of the Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center.

Authors:  Marvin J Stone; Billie E Aronoff; W Phil Evans; Joseph W Fay; Z H Lieberman; Carolyn M Matthews; George J Race; R Pickett Scruggs; C Allen Stringer
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2003-01

3.  Mammography in screening for breast cancer: a viewpoint.

Authors:  M Dworkind; S Greenberg
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  The role of the obstetrician-gynecologist in the management of breast lesions.

Authors:  L R Weekes
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 1.798

5.  Dermatologic radiotherapy and breast cancer. Dose measurements and risk quantification.

Authors:  H Goldschmidt; R O Gorson; M Lassen
Journal:  Arch Dermatol Res       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 3.017

6.  Routine mammography and the National Breast Screening Study.

Authors:  A B Miller
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1984-02-01       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Estimated benefits and risks of screening for breast cancer.

Authors:  G R Howe; G J Sherman; R M Semenciw; A B Miller
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1981-02-15       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Awareness, opinion and behavioral intention of urban women regarding mammography.

Authors:  E Berkanovic; S J Reeder
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 9.  Screening for breast cancer.

Authors:  A B Miller
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 10.  Reconstruction of absorbed doses to fibroglandular tissue of the breast of women undergoing mammography (1960 to the present).

Authors:  Isabelle Thierry-Chef; Steven L Simon; Robert M Weinstock; Deukwoo Kwon; Martha S Linet
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 2.841

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.