Literature DB >> 11062598

Methods and applications of quality-of-life measurement during antihypertensive therapy.

M A Testa1.   

Abstract

The measurement and evaluation of health-related quality of life during antihypertensive therapy has contributed to physicians' understanding of how patients respond to therapy in terms of physical, psychological, and social well-being. Comparative clinical trials of antihypertensive drug therapies have demonstrated that treatment produces no perceptible improvements in health status. Thus, the "burden" of the therapeutic regimen from the patient's perspective is greatly magnified. Research has also demonstrated that patient expectation and preference are important components of quality-of-life assessment when the purpose of this assessment is to predict or explain human behavior. Drug properties, including mechanism of action and pharmacokinetics, have been shown to influence the impact of drug side effects and the degree to which patients tolerate therapy. Researchers have attempted to standardize the construct of quality of life to have broad applications in health care policy and management; however, clinical research in hypertension should focus on the components of health-related quality of life that influence patient outcomes with regard to behaviors affecting adherence. Antihypertensive agents that maximize patient acceptance and quality of life are now available. Future quality-of-life research should be directed toward learning more about human behavior so that adherence to nonpharmacologic interventions such as diet and exercise will be enhanced.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11062598     DOI: 10.1007/s11906-996-0037-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep        ISSN: 1522-6417            Impact factor:   5.369


  19 in total

1.  Efficacy and safety of telmisartan, a selective AT1 receptor antagonist, compared with enalapril in elderly patients with primary hypertension. TEES Study Group.

Authors:  B E Karlberg; L E Lins; K Hermansson
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.844

2.  Quality of life comparison between bisoprolol and nifedipine retard in hypertension.

Authors:  J N de Hoon; F H Vanmolkot; L L van de Ven; L M Van Bortel
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 3.727

3.  Interpreting quality-of-life clinical trial data for use in the clinical practice of antihypertensive therapy.

Authors:  M A Testa
Journal:  J Hypertens Suppl       Date:  1987-02

Review 4.  Therapeutic coverage: reducing the risks of partial compliance.

Authors:  P A Meredith; H L Elliott
Journal:  Br J Clin Pract Suppl       Date:  1994-05

5.  Change in symptoms of hypertensive patients after referral to hospital clinic.

Authors:  C J Bulpitt; C T Dollery; S Carne
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1976-02

6.  Main results of the losartan versus amlodipine (LOA) study on drug tolerability and psychological general well-being. LOA Study Group.

Authors:  B Dahlöf; L H Lindholm; S Carney; P J Pentikäinen; J Ostergren
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.844

Review 7.  Integrated approaches to management of hypertension: promoting treatment acceptance.

Authors:  G T McInnes
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.749

8.  Factors associated with medication noncompliance in rural elderly hypertensive patients.

Authors:  C G McLane; S J Zyzanski; S A Flocke
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 2.689

9.  The effects of antihypertensive therapy on the quality of life.

Authors:  S H Croog; S Levine; M A Testa; B Brown; C J Bulpitt; C D Jenkins; G L Klerman; G H Williams
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1986-06-26       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Quality of life and antihypertensive therapy in men. A comparison of captopril with enalapril. The Quality-of-Life Hypertension Study Group.

Authors:  M A Testa; R B Anderson; J F Nackley; N K Hollenberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-04-01       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Quality of life with nonpharmacologic treatment of hypertension.

Authors:  J P Roel; C L Hildebrant; R H Grimm
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 2.  The relationship between quality of life and adherence to treatment.

Authors:  M I Nunes
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.369

3.  Quality of life in hypertensive clinic patients following hurricane katrina.

Authors:  Erin Stanley; Paul Muntner; Richard N Re; Edward D Frohlich; Elizabeth Holt; Marie A Krousel-Wood
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2011

4.  Health Behavior and Health-related Quality of Life in Patients with a High Risk of Cardiovascular Disease.

Authors:  Davorina Petek; Marija Petek-Ster; Ksenija Tusek-Bunc
Journal:  Zdr Varst       Date:  2018-01-05
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.