Literature DB >> 11062174

Differential effects of toxic metal compounds on the activities of Fpg and XPA, two zinc finger proteins involved in DNA repair.

M Asmuss1, L H Mullenders, A Eker, A Hartwig.   

Abstract

Even though not mutagenic, compounds of the carcinogenic metals nickel, cadmium, cobalt and arsenic have been shown previously to inhibit nucleotide excision repair and base excision repair at low, non-cytotoxic concentrations. Since some toxic metals have high affinities for -SH groups, we used the bacterial formamidopyrimidine-DNA glycosylase (Fpg protein) and the mammalian XPA protein as models to investigate whether zinc finger structures in DNA repair enzymes are particularly sensitive to carcinogenic and/or toxic metal compounds. Concentrations of </=1 mM Ni(II), Pb(II), As(III) or Co(II) did not affect the activity of the Fpg protein significantly. In contrast, the enzyme was inhibited in a dose-dependent manner by Cd(II), Cu(II) or Hg(II), starting at concentrations of 50 microM, 5 microM and 50 nM, respectively. Simultaneous treatment with Cd(II) or Cu(II) and Zn(II) partly prevented the inhibitions, while no reversal of inhibition was observed when Zn(II) was added after Cd(II) or Cu(II). In the case of Hg(II), Zn(II) had no protective effect independent of the time of its addition; however, the enzyme activity was completely restored by glutathione. Regarding XPA, Hg(II), Pb(II) or As(III) did not diminish its binding to an UV-irradiated oligonucleotide, while Cd(II), Co(II), Cu(II) and Ni(II) reduced its DNA-binding ability. Simultaneous treatment with Zn(II) prevented largely the inhibition induced by Cd(II), Co(II), and Ni(II), but only slightly in the case of Cu(II). Collectively, the results indicate that both proteins were inhibited by Cd(II) and Cu(II), XPA was additionally inactivated by Ni(II) and Co(II), and Fpg but not XPA was strongly affected by Hg(II). Even though other mechanisms of protein inactivation cannot be completely excluded, zinc finger structures may be sensitive targets for toxic metal compounds, but each zinc finger protein has unique sensitivities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11062174     DOI: 10.1093/carcin/21.11.2097

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Carcinogenesis        ISSN: 0143-3334            Impact factor:   4.944


  42 in total

1.  Arsenite Targets the Zinc Finger Domains of Tet Proteins and Inhibits Tet-Mediated Oxidation of 5-Methylcytosine.

Authors:  Shuo Liu; Ji Jiang; Lin Li; Nicholas J Amato; Zi Wang; Yinsheng Wang
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Exchange of Alkyl and Tris(2-mercapto-1-t-butylimidazolyl)hydroborato Ligands Between Zinc, Cadmium and Mercury.

Authors:  Ava Kreider-Mueller; Patrick J Quinlivan; Yi Rong; Jonathan S Owen; Gerard Parkin
Journal:  J Organomet Chem       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 2.369

3.  Inhibition of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 by arsenite interferes with repair of oxidative DNA damage.

Authors:  Wei Ding; Wenlan Liu; Karen L Cooper; Xu-Jun Qin; Patrícia L de Souza Bergo; Laurie G Hudson; Ke Jian Liu
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 4.  Molecular Mechanisms of Arsenic-Induced Disruption of DNA Repair.

Authors:  Lok Ming Tam; Nathan E Price; Yinsheng Wang
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 3.739

5.  p53-Dependent but ATM-independent inhibition of DNA synthesis and G2 arrest in cadmium-treated human fibroblasts.

Authors:  Feng Cao; Tong Zhou; Dennis Simpson; Yingchun Zhou; Jayne Boyer; Bo Chen; Taiyi Jin; Marila Cordeiro-Stone; William Kaufmann
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2006-11-11       Impact factor: 4.219

Review 6.  Causes of genome instability: the effect of low dose chemical exposures in modern society.

Authors:  Sabine A S Langie; Gudrun Koppen; Daniel Desaulniers; Fahd Al-Mulla; Rabeah Al-Temaimi; Amedeo Amedei; Amaya Azqueta; William H Bisson; Dustin G Brown; Gunnar Brunborg; Amelia K Charles; Tao Chen; Annamaria Colacci; Firouz Darroudi; Stefano Forte; Laetitia Gonzalez; Roslida A Hamid; Lisbeth E Knudsen; Luc Leyns; Adela Lopez de Cerain Salsamendi; Lorenzo Memeo; Chiara Mondello; Carmel Mothersill; Ann-Karin Olsen; Sofia Pavanello; Jayadev Raju; Emilio Rojas; Rabindra Roy; Elizabeth P Ryan; Patricia Ostrosky-Wegman; Hosni K Salem; A Ivana Scovassi; Neetu Singh; Monica Vaccari; Frederik J Van Schooten; Mahara Valverde; Jordan Woodrick; Luoping Zhang; Nik van Larebeke; Micheline Kirsch-Volders; Andrew R Collins
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.944

7.  Specific Inhibition of NEIL-initiated repair of oxidized base damage in human genome by copper and iron: potential etiological linkage to neurodegenerative diseases.

Authors:  Muralidhar L Hegde; Pavana M Hegde; Luis M F Holthauzen; Tapas K Hazra; K S Jagannatha Rao; Sankar Mitra
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-07-09       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 8.  Oxidative genome damage and its repair in neurodegenerative diseases: function of transition metals as a double-edged sword.

Authors:  Muralidhar L Hegde; Pavana M Hegde; K S Rao; Sankar Mitra
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 4.472

9.  Kinetics and thermodynamics of zinc(II) and arsenic(III) binding to XPA and PARP-1 zinc finger peptides.

Authors:  Juliana Huestis; Xixi Zhou; Li Chen; Changjian Feng; Laurie G Hudson; Ke Jian Liu
Journal:  J Inorg Biochem       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 4.155

10.  Reduction of arsenite-enhanced ultraviolet radiation-induced DNA damage by supplemental zinc.

Authors:  Karen L Cooper; Brenee S King; Monica M Sandoval; Ke Jian Liu; Laurie G Hudson
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 4.219

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.