PURPOSE: We report our continuing experience with seromuscular colocystoplasty lined with urothelium. This procedure is designed to preserve the urothelium and potentially decrease the incidence of complications associated with standard bladder augmentation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 32 patients who underwent seromuscular colocystoplasty lined with urothelium between April 1994 and July 1999. Data were collected on patient demographics, surgical indications, previous and adjunctive surgical procedures, preoperative and postoperative urinary continence, upper urinary tract changes, urodynamic parameters, surgical complications and histological findings. RESULTS: Mean patient age at surgery plus or minus standard deviation was 11.1 +/- 4.8 years. Mean followup was 1.6 +/- 1 years. A mean of 1.5 +/- 0.9 years postoperatively urodynamic studies available in 28 cases showed that total and safe bladder capacity increased by 1.8 and 2.4-fold, respectively. Continence was achieved in 71% of patients after the initial procedure, increasing to 81% after secondary procedures. Hourglass deformity developed in 7 cases (22%), augmentation failed in 4 (12.5%) and there were bladder calculi in 2 (6%). New onset or increased hydronephrosis and reflux were present in 6 of 62 (10%) and 9 of 60 (15%) evaluated renal units, respectively. Of the 7 interpretable biopsies 5 revealed various degrees of repeat colonic mucosal growth. There was no bladder perforation or metabolic abnormalities, and mucous production was not clinically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Seromuscular colocystoplasty lined with urothelium is a viable alternative to standard bladder augmentation. The 2 procedures have a similar overall complication rate. Comparatively there appears to be a low incidence of bladder calculi, mucous production has not been clinically significant, metabolic disturbances have not developed and perforation has not occurred during short-term followup. We are enthusiastic about this technique and continue to apply it in select patients.
PURPOSE: We report our continuing experience with seromuscular colocystoplasty lined with urothelium. This procedure is designed to preserve the urothelium and potentially decrease the incidence of complications associated with standard bladder augmentation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 32 patients who underwent seromuscular colocystoplasty lined with urothelium between April 1994 and July 1999. Data were collected on patient demographics, surgical indications, previous and adjunctive surgical procedures, preoperative and postoperative urinary continence, upper urinary tract changes, urodynamic parameters, surgical complications and histological findings. RESULTS: Mean patient age at surgery plus or minus standard deviation was 11.1 +/- 4.8 years. Mean followup was 1.6 +/- 1 years. A mean of 1.5 +/- 0.9 years postoperatively urodynamic studies available in 28 cases showed that total and safe bladder capacity increased by 1.8 and 2.4-fold, respectively. Continence was achieved in 71% of patients after the initial procedure, increasing to 81% after secondary procedures. Hourglass deformity developed in 7 cases (22%), augmentation failed in 4 (12.5%) and there were bladder calculi in 2 (6%). New onset or increased hydronephrosis and reflux were present in 6 of 62 (10%) and 9 of 60 (15%) evaluated renal units, respectively. Of the 7 interpretable biopsies 5 revealed various degrees of repeat colonic mucosal growth. There was no bladder perforation or metabolic abnormalities, and mucous production was not clinically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Seromuscular colocystoplasty lined with urothelium is a viable alternative to standard bladder augmentation. The 2 procedures have a similar overall complication rate. Comparatively there appears to be a low incidence of bladder calculi, mucous production has not been clinically significant, metabolic disturbances have not developed and perforation has not occurred during short-term followup. We are enthusiastic about this technique and continue to apply it in select patients.
Authors: Alex Turner; Ramnath Subramanian; David F M Thomas; Jennifer Hinley; Syed Khawar Abbas; Jens Stahlschmidt; Jennifer Southgate Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2010-12-22 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Ramnath Subramaniam; Alexander M Turner; S Khawar Abbas; David F M Thomas; Jennifer Southgate Journal: Urology Date: 2012-11 Impact factor: 2.649