PURPOSE: We determined the number of shock wave lithotripsy treatments that should be given for a single ureteral stone before alternate modalities are used. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We compared the stone-free rate of initial shock wave lithotripsy for ureteral calculi with that of subsequent treatments. We evaluated 1,593 ureteral stones treated with the Dornier MFL 5000 lithotriptor* from January 1, 1994 to September 1, 1999 using various parameters associated with treatment outcome. RESULTS: The stone-free rate after initial treatment was 68% (1,086 of 1,593 stones), which decreased to 46% (126 of 273) after re-treatment 1. We observed a further decrease in the stone-free rate after re-treatment 2 to 31% (19 of 61 stones, p = 0.001). The cumulative stone-free rate increased to 76% (1,212 of 1,593 stones) after 2 treatments and to 77% (1,231 of 1593) after 3. The stone-free rate for stones 10 mm. or less was significantly better than that of stones 11 to 20 mm. initially (64% versus 43%) and after re-treatment (49% versus 37%). A ureteral stent decreased the stone-free rate of initial treatment and re-treatment 1 by 12% and 14%, respectively (p = 0.001). After initial treatment the stone-free rate of the upper and mid ureter was significantly higher than that of the lower ureter. Patient weight had no significant impact on success in either group. CONCLUSIONS: The stone-free rate of re-treating ureteral calculi with shock wave lithotripsy decreases significantly after the initial treatment. These findings imply that ureteroscopic management of ureteral stones may be better than shock wave lithotripsy after initial shock wave lithotripsy fails.
PURPOSE: We determined the number of shock wave lithotripsy treatments that should be given for a single ureteral stone before alternate modalities are used. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We compared the stone-free rate of initial shock wave lithotripsy for ureteral calculi with that of subsequent treatments. We evaluated 1,593 ureteral stones treated with the Dornier MFL 5000 lithotriptor* from January 1, 1994 to September 1, 1999 using various parameters associated with treatment outcome. RESULTS: The stone-free rate after initial treatment was 68% (1,086 of 1,593 stones), which decreased to 46% (126 of 273) after re-treatment 1. We observed a further decrease in the stone-free rate after re-treatment 2 to 31% (19 of 61 stones, p = 0.001). The cumulative stone-free rate increased to 76% (1,212 of 1,593 stones) after 2 treatments and to 77% (1,231 of 1593) after 3. The stone-free rate for stones 10 mm. or less was significantly better than that of stones 11 to 20 mm. initially (64% versus 43%) and after re-treatment (49% versus 37%). A ureteral stent decreased the stone-free rate of initial treatment and re-treatment 1 by 12% and 14%, respectively (p = 0.001). After initial treatment the stone-free rate of the upper and mid ureter was significantly higher than that of the lower ureter. Patient weight had no significant impact on success in either group. CONCLUSIONS: The stone-free rate of re-treating ureteral calculi with shock wave lithotripsy decreases significantly after the initial treatment. These findings imply that ureteroscopic management of ureteral stones may be better than shock wave lithotripsy after initial shock wave lithotripsy fails.
Authors: Michael Ordon; Sero Andonian; Brian Blew; Trevor Schuler; Ben Chew; Kenneth T Pace Journal: Can Urol Assoc J Date: 2015-12-14 Impact factor: 1.862
Authors: Thomas H Forster; Gernot Bonkat; Stephen Wyler; Robin Ruszat; Nicole Ebinger; Thomas C Gasser; Alexander Bachmann Journal: Wien Klin Wochenschr Date: 2008 Impact factor: 1.704