Literature DB >> 11059704

Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: recruitment and follow-up.

R C Folsom1, J E Widen, B R Vohr, B Cone-Wesson, M P Gorga, Y S Sininger, S J Norton.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to describe the recruitment and retention strategies as well as the sample demographics for families with infants completing the neonatal examination and returning for follow-up. These data are compared to those infants inactivated from the study.
DESIGN: This study was a prospective, randomized clinical study. All infants who were confined to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and well babies with at least one risk indicator were targeted for behavioral audiometric follow-up testing. In addition, infants without risk factors from the well-baby nursery, but who failed a newborn test, were also followed. Several variables were evaluated to determine those factors, if any, that might predict which families returned for follow-up testing.
RESULTS: Recruitment was achieved as per study design with 4911 high-risk infants and 2348 well-baby nursery infants (without risk indicators for hearing) enrolled. Of the 4911 high-risk infants enrolled, 64% were successfully recruited into the follow-up portion of the study. This was less than the projected rate of 80%. Factors predicting noncompliance with the study protocol for follow-up were predominantly sociodemographic and included nonwhite race, no insurance, substance abuse, young maternal age, more than two children at home, and late onset of prenatal care.
CONCLUSIONS: Factors related to low socioeconomic status and increased social risk were the strongest predictors of poor study protocol compliance. Despite retention challenges, 64% of the targeted, high-risk infants subsequently returned for the 8-to 12-mo behavioral hearing assessment protocols for validation purposes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11059704     DOI: 10.1097/00003446-200010000-00010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  6 in total

1.  Meeting the Joint Committee on Infant Hearing Standards in a Large Metropolitan Children's Hospital: Barriers and Next Steps.

Authors:  Rebecca Awad; Johanna Oropeza; Kristin M Uhler
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 1.493

2.  [Hearing screening at nursery schools: results of an evaluation study].

Authors:  Viktor Weichbold; Monika Rohrer; Cornelia Winkler; Kunigunde Welzl-Müller
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2004-07-31       Impact factor: 1.704

3.  Effect of patient socioeconomic status on perceptions of first- and second-year medical students.

Authors:  James K H Woo; Sahar H Ghorayeb; Cheong K Lee; Harpreet Sangha; Suzanne Richter
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2004-06-22       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Factors influencing follow-up to newborn hearing screening for infants who are hard of hearing.

Authors:  Lenore Holte; Elizabeth Walker; Jacob Oleson; Meredith Spratford; Mary Pat Moeller; Patricia Roush; Hua Ou; J Bruce Tomblin
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 1.493

5.  Community-based infant hearing screening in a developing country: parental uptake of follow-up services.

Authors:  Bolajoko O Olusanya; Oladele O Akinyemi
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Referral and Lost to System Rates of Two Newborn Hearing Screening Programs in Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Ahmad A Alanazi
Journal:  Int J Neonatal Screen       Date:  2020-06-27
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.