Literature DB >> 11059441

Efficacy of newer medications for treating depression in primary care patients.

C D Mulrow1, J W Williams, E Chiquette, C Aguilar, P Hitchcock-Noel, S Lee, J Cornell, K Stamm.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Several medications have recently been introduced for the treatment of depression. We reviewed the literature to summarize their efficacy in the treatment of depression in adult patients in primary care settings.
METHODS: We searched the literature published from 1980 to January 1998 using the Cochrane Collaboration Depression Anxiety and Neurosis Group's specialized registry of 8,451 clinical trials, references from trials and 46 pertinent meta-analyses, and consultation with experts. We included randomized controlled trials of at least 6 weeks' duration that measured clinical outcomes and compared one of 32 newer medications with another newer antidepressant, an older antidepressant, a placebo, or a psychosocial intervention for the treatment of depressed patients in primary care settings. The primary outcome was response rate, defined as the proportion of patients experiencing a 50% or greater improvement in depressive symptoms.
RESULTS: There were 28 randomized controlled trials involving 5,940 adult primary care patients with major depression, depression requiring treatment, dysthymia, or mixed anxiety depression. Newer agents, including selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors, serotonin norepinephrine inhibitors, reversible inhibitors of monoamine oxidase, and dopamine antagonists, were usually compared with tricyclic agents. Average response rates were 63% for newer agents, 35% for placebo, and 60% for tricyclic agents. Newer agents were significantly more effective than placebo [risk ratio = 1.6; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.2 to 2.1), but similar to tricyclic agents (risk ratio = 1.0; 95% CI, 0.9 to 1.1). Response rates were similar in the different types of depressive disorders, except that two small trials in frail older patients showed no significant effects of newer agents compared with placebo. Dropout rates as a result of adverse effects were 8% with newer agents and 13% with tricyclic agents (P <0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: In primary care settings, newer antidepressants are more effective than placebo and have similar efficacy compared with tricyclic agents in the acute treatment of depression. Dropout rates as a result of adverse effects are lower with newer compared with tricyclic agents. Future studies should compare the effectiveness of different therapies among primary care patients with less severe depression and greater medical and psychiatric comorbidity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11059441     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9343(99)00316-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med        ISSN: 0002-9343            Impact factor:   4.965


  31 in total

Review 1.  Prescribing medication for Asians with mental disorders.

Authors:  Jian-Ping Chen; Charles Barron; Keh-Ming Lin; Henry Chung
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  2002-09

2.  Cognitive Therapy for Dysthymia.

Authors:  Dean Schuyler
Journal:  Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2004

Review 3.  Examination of the utility of psychotherapy for patients with treatment resistant depression: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ranak B Trivedi; Jason A Nieuwsma; John W Williams
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-12-24       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 4.  The pharmacotherapy of chronic pain: a review.

Authors:  Mary E Lynch; C Peter N Watson
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.037

5.  [Developmental process of DGPPN quality indicators].

Authors:  I Großimlinghaus; P Falkai; W Gaebel; B Janssen; D Reich-Erkelenz; T Wobrock; J Zielasek
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.214

Review 6.  A generalist's guide to treating patients with depression with an emphasis on using side effects to tailor antidepressant therapy.

Authors:  J Michael Bostwick
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 7.616

7.  Association of Hyponatraemia and Antidepressant Drugs: A Pharmacovigilance-Pharmacodynamic Assessment Through an Analysis of the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) Database.

Authors:  Faizan Mazhar; Marco Pozzi; Marta Gentili; Marco Scatigna; Emilio Clementi; Sonia Radice; Carla Carnovale
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 8.  Efficacy and acceptability of pharmacological treatments for depressive disorders in primary care: systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Klaus Linde; Levente Kriston; Gerta Rücker; Susanne Jamil; Isabelle Schumann; Karin Meissner; Kirsten Sigterman; Antonius Schneider
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.166

9.  The symptom-specific efficacy of antidepressant medication vs. cognitive behavioral therapy in the treatment of depression: results from an individual patient data meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lynn Boschloo; Ella Bekhuis; Erica S Weitz; Mirjam Reijnders; Robert J DeRubeis; Sona Dimidjian; David L Dunner; Boadie W Dunlop; Ulrich Hegerl; Steven D Hollon; Robin B Jarrett; Sidney H Kennedy; Jeanne Miranda; David C Mohr; Anne D Simons; Gordon Parker; Frank Petrak; Stephan Herpertz; Lena C Quilty; A John Rush; Zindel V Segal; Jeffrey R Vittengl; Robert A Schoevers; Pim Cuijpers
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 49.548

10.  The Bypassing the Blues treatment protocol: stepped collaborative care for treating post-CABG depression.

Authors:  Bruce L Rollman; Bea Herbeck Belnap; Michelle S LeMenager; Sati Mazumdar; Herbert C Schulberg; Charles F Reynolds
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  2009-02-02       Impact factor: 4.312

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.