Literature DB >> 11059095

Handling information ethically. Some strategies for discussion.

A Braunack-Mayer1, W Rogers.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A lack of consensus currently exists about which uses of patient data require informed consent or review by a human research ethics committee. However, any use of patient data other than for clinical care, requires the consent of the patient.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this paper is to discuss strategies for strengthening current practices regarding the use of patient information in general practice research, evaluation and audit. DISCUSSION: Increasing community discussion and debate with respect to the use of patient data for research and evaluation is a pressing issue. Divisions of general practice are well placed to lead in this debate given the extent of community representation in many divisions' activities. Development of guidelines for use by those undertaking research and evaluation activities in general practice, based upon the Privacy Principles, will ensure a high standard of protection for patients. Community based Human Research Ethics Committees may be an appropriate way of providing education and training as well as a review of general practice research and related activities.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; National Health and Medical Research Council (Australia)

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11059095

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust Fam Physician        ISSN: 0300-8495


  1 in total

1.  Supporting ethical practice in primary care research: strategies for action.

Authors:  Wendy A Rogers; Lisa Schwartz
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.386

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.