Literature DB >> 11058483

Sexual orientation in a U.S. national sample of twin and nontwin sibling pairs.

K S Kendler1, L M Thornton, S E Gilman, R C Kessler.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Although previous studies have suggested that sexual orientation is influenced by familial factors, which may be partly genetic, these studies have relied on unrepresentative and potentially biased samples. The authors attempted to estimate the role of genetic and environmental factors in the determination of sexual orientation in a more representative sample.
METHOD: Sexual orientation was assessed by a single item on a self-report questionnaire in a U.S. national sample of twin and nontwin sibling pairs. Sexual orientation was classified as heterosexual or nonheterosexual (bisexual or homosexual). The authors compared the similarity of sexual orientation in the monozygotic twins to the similarity in the same-sex dizygotic twins, all dizygotic twins, the same-sex dizygotic twins and sibling pairs, and all dizygotic twins and sibling pairs. Biometrical twin analyses were performed.
RESULTS: All analyses demonstrated familial resemblance for sexual orientation. Resemblance was greater in the monozygotic twins than in the dizygotic twins or in the dizygotic twins plus nontwin siblings. Biometrical twin modeling suggested that sexual orientation was substantially influenced by genetic factors, but family environment may also play a role. No evidence was found for a violation of the equal-environment assumption regarding monozygotic and dizygotic twin pairs.
CONCLUSIONS: Familial factors, which are at least partly genetic, influence sexual orientation. The results of these analyses should be interpreted in the context of low statistical power and the use of a single item to assess the complex phenotype of sexual orientation.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11058483     DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.157.11.1843

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Psychiatry        ISSN: 0002-953X            Impact factor:   18.112


  33 in total

1.  Genetic and Environmental Overlap Between Childhood Maltreatment and Adult Physical Health.

Authors:  Susan C South; Markus H Schafer; Kenneth F Ferraro
Journal:  Twin Res Hum Genet       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.587

2.  A genomewide scan of male sexual orientation.

Authors:  Brian S Mustanski; Michael G Dupree; Caroline M Nievergelt; Sven Bocklandt; Nicholas J Schork; Dean H Hamer
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2005-01-12       Impact factor: 4.132

3.  Biological versus nonbiological older brothers and men's sexual orientation.

Authors:  Anthony F Bogaert
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-06-28       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  A common heritable factor influences prosocial obligations across multiple domains.

Authors:  Gary J Lewis; Timothy C Bates
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  Genetic and Environmental Influences on Adult Mental Health: Evidence for Gene-Environment Interplay as a Function of Maternal and Paternal Discipline and Affection.

Authors:  Susan C South; Amber M Jarnecke
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2015-04-05       Impact factor: 2.805

6.  Evidence for distinct biodevelopmental influences on male sexual orientation.

Authors:  Ashlyn Swift-Gallant; Lindsay A Coome; Madison Aitken; D Ashley Monks; Doug P VanderLaan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Sexual orientation and relationship choice in borderline personality disorder over ten years of prospective follow-up.

Authors:  D Bradford Reich; Mary C Zanarini
Journal:  J Pers Disord       Date:  2008-12

8.  Male androphilia in the ancestral environment. An ethnological analysis.

Authors:  Doug P VanderLaan; Zhiyuan Ren; Paul L Vasey
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2013-12

9.  Genetic and environmental influences on individual differences in attitudes toward homosexuality: an Australian twin study.

Authors:  Karin J H Verweij; Sri N Shekar; Brendan P Zietsch; Lindon J Eaves; J Michael Bailey; Dorret I Boomsma; Nicholas G Martin
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 2.805

10.  The Nature-Nurture Debate is Over, and Both Sides Lost! Implications for Understanding Gender Differences in Religiosity.

Authors:  Matt Bradshaw; Christopher G Ellison
Journal:  J Sci Study Relig       Date:  2009-06-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.