Literature DB >> 11057536

Biomechanical evaluation of a new modular rod-screw implant system for posterior instrumentation of the occipito-cervical spine: in-vitro comparison with two established implant systems.

M Richter1, H J Wilke, P Kluger, S Neller, L Claes, W Puhl.   

Abstract

Posterior instrumentation of the occipito-cervical spine has become an established procedure in a variety of indications. The use of rod-screw systems improved posterior instrumentation as it allows optimal screw positioning adapted to the individual anatomic situation. However, there are still some drawbacks concerning the different implant designs. Therefore, a new modular rod-screw implant system has been developed to overcome some of the drawbacks of established systems. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether posterior internal fixation of the occipito-cervical spine with the new implant system improves primary biomechanical stability. Three different internal fixation systems were compared in this study: the CerviFix System, the Olerud Cervical Rod Spinal System and the newly developed Neon Occipito Cervical System. Eight human cervical spine CO/C5 specimens were instrumented from C0 to C4 with occipital fixation, transarticular screws in C1/C2 and lateral mass or pedicle screws in C3 and C4. The specimens were tested in flexion/extension, axial rotation, and lateral bending using pure moments of +/- 2.5 Nm without axial preload. After testing the intact spine, the different instrumentations were tested after destabilising C0/C2 and C3/C4. Primary stability was significantly increased, in all load cases, with the new modular implant system compared to the other implant systems. Pedicle screw instrumentation tended to be more stable compared to lateral mass screws; nevertheless, significant differences were observed only for lateral bending. As the experimental design precluded any cyclic testing, the data represent only the primary stability of the implants. In summary, this study showed that posterior instrumentation of the cervical spine using the new Neon Occipito Cervical System improves primary biomechanical stability compared to the CerviFix System and the Olerud Cervical Rod Spinal System.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11057536      PMCID: PMC3611381          DOI: 10.1007/s005860000173

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  10 in total

1.  Effect of constrained posterior screw and rod systems for primary stability: biomechanical in vitro comparison of various instrumentations in a single-level corpectomy model.

Authors:  René Schmidt; Hans-Joachim Wilke; Lutz Claes; Wolfhart Puhl; Marcus Richter
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-07-10       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Factors affecting the interface of cervical spine facet screws placed in the technique by Roy-Camille et al.

Authors:  T R Pitzen; S Zenner; D Barbier; T Georg; W I Steudel
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-03-27       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Pedicle screw placement accuracy in thoracic and lumbar spinal surgery with a patient-matched targeting guide: a cadaveric study.

Authors:  Claudio Lamartina; Riccardo Cecchinato; Zsolt Fekete; Alberto Lipari; Meinrad Fiechter; P Berjano
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Clinical accuracy of cervical pedicle screw insertion using lateral fluoroscopy: a radiographic analysis of the learning curve.

Authors:  Hisashi Yoshimoto; Shigenobu Sato; Takahiko Hyakumachi; Yasushi Yanagibashi; Taiki Kanno; Takeshi Masuda
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-08-04       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Biomechanical and histological evaluation of an expandable pedicle screw in osteoporotic spine in sheep.

Authors:  Shiyong Wan; Wei Lei; Zixiang Wu; Da Liu; Mingxuan Gao; Suochao Fu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Percutaneous instrumentation of the cervical and cervico-thoracic spine using pedicle screws: preliminary clinical results and analysis of accuracy.

Authors:  Christian Schaefer; Phillip Begemann; Ina Fuhrhop; Malte Schroeder; Lennart Viezens; Lothar Wiesner; Nils Hansen-Algenstaedt
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-04-05       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Complications of transpedicular screw fixation in the cervical spine.

Authors:  E Kast; K Mohr; H-P Richter; W Börm
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-05-24       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Percutaneous, Navigated Minimally Invasive Posterior Cervical Pedicle Screw Fixation.

Authors:  Domagoj Coric; Vincent J Rossi; John Peloza; Paul K Kim; Tim E Adamson
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-10-29

9.  Intra-osseous ultrasound for pedicle screw positioning in the subaxial cervical spine: an experimental study.

Authors:  Sven Rainer Kantelhardt; Hans Christoph Bock; Laila Siam; Jörg Larsen; Ralf Burger; Wolfgang Schillinger; Volker Bockermann; Veit Rohde; Alf Giese
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 2.216

10.  A new dorsal modular fixation device allows a modified approach in cervical and cervico-thoracic neoplastic lesions.

Authors:  K Huch; B Cakir; K Dreinhöfer; W Puhl; M Richter
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-01-20       Impact factor: 3.134

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.