Literature DB >> 11057415

Biological monitoring of occupational exposure to N,N-dimethylformamide--the effects of co-exposure to toluene or dermal exposure.

J S Yang1, E A Kim, M Y Lee, I J Park, S K Kang.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to assess the exposure and intake dose of N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) and the correlation between them, according to the type of exposure for the workers in the DMF industry.
METHODS: We monitored 345 workers occupationally exposed to DMF, from 15 workshops in the synthetic fiber, fiber coating, synthetic leather and paint manufacturing industries. Ambient monitoring was carried out with personal samplers to monitor the external exposure. Biological monitoring was done to determine the internal dose by analyzing N-methylformamide (NMF) in end-shift urine. Work procedure and exposure type of each DMF workshop was carefully surveyed, to classify workers by exposure type according to work details. Workers were classified into three groups (Group A: continuous and direct exposure through inhalation and skin; Group B: intermittent and short-term exposure through inhalation and skin; Group C: continuous and indirect exposure mostly through inhalation).
RESULTS: Geometric mean of DMF concentration in air was 2.62 (GSD 5.30) ppm and that of NMF in urine was 14.50 (GSD 3.89) mg/l. In the case of continuous absorption through inhalation and dermal exposure (Group A), the value of NMF in urine corresponding to 10 ppm of DMF was 45.3 mg/l (r = 0.524, n = 178), 39.1 mg/g creatinine (r = 0.424), while it was 37.7 mg/l (r = 0.788, n = 37), 24.2 mg/g creatinine (r = 0.743) in the case of absorption mostly through inhalation (Group C). Creatinine correction reduced the correlation between two parameters.
CONCLUSION: The NMF in urine corresponding to 10 ppm DMF, of the dermal and inhalation exposure group was 39.1 mg/g creatinine (r = 0.424, n = 178), while that of the inhalation exposure-only group was 24.2 mg/g creatinine (r = 0.743, n = 37). Co-exposure with toluene reduced the NMF excretion in urine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11057415     DOI: 10.1007/s004200000168

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health        ISSN: 0340-0131            Impact factor:   3.015


  5 in total

1.  Environmental monitoring of occupational exposure to N,N-dimethylformamide: comparison between active and diffusive sampling.

Authors:  Serena Baglioni; Claudia Cassinelli; Grazia Bongini; Isabella Cenni; Nicoletta Graziani; Mauro Landini; Gianni Tanturli; Marek Brabec; Paolo Bavazzano
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2006-06-24       Impact factor: 3.015

2.  Human Biomonitoring Initiative (HBM4EU): Human Biomonitoring Guidance Values Derived for Dimethylformamide.

Authors:  Farida Lamkarkach; Matthieu Meslin; Marike Kolossa-Gehring; Petra Apel; Robert Garnier
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2022-05-31

3.  The effects of co-exposure to methyl ethyl ketone on the biological monitoring of occupational exposure to N,N-dimethylformamide.

Authors:  Ho-Yuan Chang; Tung-Sheng Shih; Ching-Chang Cheng; Ching-Yi Tsai; Jim-Shoung Lai; Ven-Shing Wang
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2003-02-04       Impact factor: 3.015

4.  Biological monitoring of workers exposed to N, N-dimethylformamide in synthetic leather manufacturing factories in Korea.

Authors:  Hyoung-Ah Kim; Kangyoon Kim; Yong Heo; Se-Hoon Lee; Ho-Chun Choi
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2003-12-09       Impact factor: 3.015

5.  Prioritizing Type of Industry through Health Risk Assessment of Occupational Exposure to Dimethylformamide in the Workplace.

Authors:  Junghyun Lee; Miran Hahm; Da-An Huh; Sang-Hoon Byeon
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.