L W Chu1, K C Chiu, S L Hui, G K Yu, W J Tsui, P W Lee. 1. Division of Geriatrics, University Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong SAR. lwchu@hkucc.hku.hk
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale cognitive subscale (ADAS-cog) was reported to be a sensitive cognitive function assessment scale for Alzheimer's Disease (AD). The English, Greek, Spanish but not Chinese versions had been validated previously. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of the present study were to investigate the reliability and validity of an adapted Chinese version of the ADAS-cog among Chinese elderly AD patients in Hong Kong. MATERIALS AND METHOD: Thirty-nine subjects were recruited during the period July to December 1998. Twenty were AD patients while 19 were non-demented normal subjects. Two raters administered the ADAS-cog scale thrice on different occasions. RESULTS: The internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) of the ADAS-cog were 0.91, 0.88 and 0.65 for the whole group, the AD and normal (i.e. non-demented) subjects respectively. The test-retest reliability as measured by the Spearman's rho correlation coefficients were 0.96, 0.86 and 0.86 for the whole group, AD and normal subjects, respectively, (all P < 0.001). The Spearman's rho correlation coefficients for inter-rater reliability were 0.95 (P < 0.001), 0.91 (P < 0.001) and 0.65 (P = 0.003) for the whole group, AD and normal subjects, respectively. The ADAS-cog score was inversely related to the Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE) score (Spearman's rho = -0.91; P < 0.001). The ADAS-cog score was directly proportional to the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) (rho = 0.89; P < 0.001). Forward stepwise discriminant function analysis between AD and normal subjects yielded a canonical discriminant function with 3-question items (i.e. word recall test, orientation and comprehension of speech; P < 0.001). This short version had a sensitivity of 90%, specificity of 94.7% and overall accuracy of 92.3%. CONCLUSION: The Chinese version of ADAS-cog subscale is both reliable and valid among the elderly Chinese in Hong Kong.
INTRODUCTION: The Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale cognitive subscale (ADAS-cog) was reported to be a sensitive cognitive function assessment scale for Alzheimer's Disease (AD). The English, Greek, Spanish but not Chinese versions had been validated previously. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of the present study were to investigate the reliability and validity of an adapted Chinese version of the ADAS-cog among Chinese elderly ADpatients in Hong Kong. MATERIALS AND METHOD: Thirty-nine subjects were recruited during the period July to December 1998. Twenty were ADpatients while 19 were non-demented normal subjects. Two raters administered the ADAS-cog scale thrice on different occasions. RESULTS: The internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) of the ADAS-cog were 0.91, 0.88 and 0.65 for the whole group, the AD and normal (i.e. non-demented) subjects respectively. The test-retest reliability as measured by the Spearman's rho correlation coefficients were 0.96, 0.86 and 0.86 for the whole group, AD and normal subjects, respectively, (all P < 0.001). The Spearman's rho correlation coefficients for inter-rater reliability were 0.95 (P < 0.001), 0.91 (P < 0.001) and 0.65 (P = 0.003) for the whole group, AD and normal subjects, respectively. The ADAS-cog score was inversely related to the Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE) score (Spearman's rho = -0.91; P < 0.001). The ADAS-cog score was directly proportional to the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) (rho = 0.89; P < 0.001). Forward stepwise discriminant function analysis between AD and normal subjects yielded a canonical discriminant function with 3-question items (i.e. word recall test, orientation and comprehension of speech; P < 0.001). This short version had a sensitivity of 90%, specificity of 94.7% and overall accuracy of 92.3%. CONCLUSION: The Chinese version of ADAS-cog subscale is both reliable and valid among the elderly Chinese in Hong Kong.
Authors: Wutao Lou; Lin Shi; Defeng Wang; Cindy W C Tam; Winnie C W Chu; Vincent C T Mok; Sheung-Tak Cheng; Linda C W Lam Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2015-05-28 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: V C T Mok; A Wong; W W M Lam; Y H Fan; W K Tang; T Kwok; A C F Hui; K S Wong Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 10.154
Authors: Willem J R Bossers; Lucas H V van der Woude; Froukje Boersma; Erik J A Scherder; Marieke J G van Heuvelen Journal: Dement Geriatr Cogn Dis Extra Date: 2012-12-08