BACKGROUND: Head extension and excessive laryngoscope blade levering motion (LBLM) are undesirable during airway management of trauma patients. We hypothesized that laryngoscopy with a modified blade facilitating glottic exposure by balloon inflation would reduce head extension and LBLM. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventeen elective surgery patients were enrolled. Patients lay supine with their heads flat on a rigid board and had a rigid collar around their necks. Laryngoscopy was performed with the modified blade and a standard curved blade. Head extension and LBLM angles were determined upon maximal glottic exposure and compared used paired t-tests. Laryngoscopic view grade and oxygen saturation were also determined. RESULTS: Balloon laryngoscopy resulted in less head extension and LBLM (P <0.001). Laryngoscopic view was approximately identical with both blades, and oxygen saturation was always above 97%. CONCLUSIONS: Balloon laryngoscopy reduces head extension and LBLM under simulated cervical spine precautions.
BACKGROUND: Head extension and excessive laryngoscope blade levering motion (LBLM) are undesirable during airway management of traumapatients. We hypothesized that laryngoscopy with a modified blade facilitating glottic exposure by balloon inflation would reduce head extension and LBLM. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventeen elective surgery patients were enrolled. Patients lay supine with their heads flat on a rigid board and had a rigid collar around their necks. Laryngoscopy was performed with the modified blade and a standard curved blade. Head extension and LBLM angles were determined upon maximal glottic exposure and compared used paired t-tests. Laryngoscopic view grade and oxygen saturation were also determined. RESULTS: Balloon laryngoscopy resulted in less head extension and LBLM (P <0.001). Laryngoscopic view was approximately identical with both blades, and oxygen saturation was always above 97%. CONCLUSIONS: Balloon laryngoscopy reduces head extension and LBLM under simulated cervical spine precautions.
Cervical spine stabilization manoeuvres are employed during
conventional airway management of traumapatients to avoid secondary
neurological deficits [1,2,3,4,5]. A degree of
potentially hazardous head extension may still be necessary for laryngeal
visualization, however [1]. Head and neck stabilization
may prevent the alignment of mouth and glottis [1]. Poor
laryngeal visualization is frequently associated with excessive laryngoscope
blade levering motion (LBLM) and subsequent risk of upper teeth or gum trauma
[6].In the present study, we performed laryngoscopy with a no. 4 standard
and a no. 4 modified curved blade in elective surgery patients under simulated
cervical spine precautions. The modified blade carries two no. 10 Foley
catheters (Fig. 1) and is a partial development of a new
laryngoscope (international patent document no. 98/19589) [7]. The standard balloon laryngoscopy technique includes
modified blade tip insertion into the vallecula, right catheter balloon
inflation with 2ml air (Fig. 1) and blade elevation to
achieve the best laryngeal view [8]. In patients with
anterior larynx, the lifting of the epiglottis is facilitated by establishing
adequate contact between the inflated balloon's upper surface and the
tongue base and hyoid bone [8].
Figure 1
Modified Macintosh Blade with right catheter balloon inflated with
2 ml air and automatic angle finder. MR, angle finder's metallic ruler;
VA, angle finder's vertical arm.
We hypothesized that balloon laryngoscopy might result in less head
extension and LBLM, because balloon inflation and subsequent blade elevation
should facilitate laryngeal exposure and reduce the extent of the necessary
laryngoscopic manoeuvres.We determined the head extension and LBLM needed for maximal glottic
exposure with both blades, the laryngoscopic view grade during each
laryngoscopy and oxygen saturation. The present results showed significant
reduction in the head extension and LBLM angles during balloon
laryngoscopy.Modified Macintosh Blade with right catheter balloon inflated with
2 ml air and automatic angle finder. MR, angle finder's metallic ruler;
VA, angle finder's vertical arm.
Patients and methods
Ethics committee approval and informed, written patient consent were
obtained. The enrollees were adult males, classified as American Society of
Anesthesiologists physical status I, and were scheduled for elective surgery
that required general anaesthesia with endotracheal intubation. Exclusion
criteria were a history of cervical spine pathology, any condition predisposing
to pulmonary aspiration and previous difficult intubation [4]. All patients had Mallampati class I oropharyngeal views
[9], head extension was greater than 35° [10], thyromental distance was greater than 6.5 cm [10], sternomental distance was greater than 13.5 cm [11], maximal incisal opening was greater then 4 cm [12] and body mass index was less than
27.5 kg/m2[13].The operating table was kept parallel to the operating room floor
(defined as horizontal plane) as follows: an automatic angle finder (serial no
295; Fisher Instruments, Kent, UK), detached from its metallic ruler (Fig. 1), was sequentially placed on the right-long and
cephalad-short sides of the table's metallic frame; and each time the
table's inclination was adjusted until the angle finder read 0°.Patients lay supine with their heads flat on the operating table.
Before induction of anaesthesia, a piece of adhesive tape (1.2×5cm) was
placed on the right patient cheek with its median longitudinal axis parallel to
the occlusal surface of the maxillary molars (or gums; Fig. 2). Standard monitoring (including pulse oximetry) was
used.
Figure 2
An adhesive tape is placed on the right cheek of an assistant. The
tape's median longitudinal axis (AB) is parallel to the occlusal surface
of the maxillary molars.
After 5 min preoxygenation with 100% oxygen, anaesthesia was induced
with fentanyl (2 μ g/kg) and propofol (2.5 mg/kg). After the disappearance
of the eyelid reflex, a rigid board was placed under each patients'
shoulders and occiput [5], and a rigid Philadelphia
collar was fitted around their necks. Airway instrumentation was facilitated
with intravenous succinylcholine (1.5 mg/kg). After the disappearance of the
fasciculations in the face, the patient head was placed in the neutral position
by aligning the occlusal surface of the maxillary molars' perpendicular
to the operating table as follows: the angle finder's 'vertical
arm' (Fig. 1) was placed on the longitudinal axis of
the adhesive tape (Fig. 2), and the head was manipulated
until the angle finder read 0°. Subsequently, laryngoscopy was performed
with both standard and modified blades in randomized order. In between
laryngoscopies, neutral head position was resumed.Balloon laryngoscopy technique consisted of modified blade tip
insertion into the vallecula, right catheter balloon inflation with 2 ml air,
and blade elevation until maximal glottic exposure was achieved. The angles of
the laryngoscope handle and the maxillary molars' occlusal surface
relative to horizontal (Fig. 3; angles â1
and â2, respectively) were measured with the angle finder upon
maximal glottic exposure with each blade. To measure the angle of the handle
relative to horizontal, the angle finder's metallic ruler was placed on
the median longitudinal axis of the handle's posterior aspect. All
patients were intubated during the second laryngoscopy immediately after
measurements were taken.
Figure 3
Lateral neck radiograph during conventional direct laryngoscopy
(informed and written patient consent were obtained). The angle of head
extension is defined as 90°–â2.â1, angle
between AH and horizontal plane; â2, angle between
occlusal surface of maxillary molarsand horizontal plane;
â3, angle of laryngoscope blade levering motion; AH, axis of
handle; CH, chord corresponding to the radian formed by the proximal third of
the laryngoscope blade convex surface; E, distal end point of said radian; OS,
axis of occlusal surface of maxillary molars or gums.
Airway instrumentation was performed by a senior anesthesiologist
(MPB), who had a prior experience of more than 200 balloon laryngoscopies. The
measured angles, the best laryngoscopic view during each laryngoscopy and
oxygen saturation throughout the study were recorded. The laryngoscopic view
was graded with the use of a modified grading scale (Table 1) proposed by SDM and MJJ.
Table 1
The modified Cormack-Lehane grading scale used to evaluate the
laryngoscopic findings obtained in the present study
Laryngoscopic view
Grade
The anterior commissure of glottis is visible
I
More than 50% of glottis is visible; the anterior
IIa
commissure of glottis is not visible
Less than 50% of glottis is visible, including its
IIb
posterior commissure and the arytenoid cartilages
Only the arytenoid cartilages and the epiglottis are
visible
IIIa
Only the epiglottis is visible
IIIb
Only the retropharyngeal wall is visible
IV
The difference '90°-â2' was defined
as head extension angle, and the difference
'â1-â2' was defined as the LBLM
angle. The LBLM angle (Fig. 3; angle â3)
is formed between the occlusal surface axis of the maxillary molars or gums
(Fig. 3; line OS) and a chord (Fig. 3; line CH) that is perpendicular to the axis of the handle
(Fig. 3; line AH) and corresponds to the radian formed by
the proximal one-third of the convex surface of the blade. This chord passes
through the distal end point of the radian (Fig. 3; point
E).The maximal acceptable laryngoscopy duration and time between the two
laryngoscopies were 30s, and the maximal allowable study procedure duration was
180s. Procedure timing began upon succinylcholine administration.Data from patients with laryngeal views differing by two or more
consecutive grades between the two laryngoscopies(eg grade I and grade
II) were excluded from the subsequent statistical analysis
(see Discussion). The head extension and LBLM angles with each laryngoscope
blade were calculated and compared with the paired t-test. P
< 0.05 was considered statistically significant.An adhesive tape is placed on the right cheek of an assistant. The
tape's median longitudinal axis (AB) is parallel to the occlusal surface
of the maxillary molars.Lateral neck radiograph during conventional direct laryngoscopy
(informed and written patient consent were obtained). The angle of head
extension is defined as 90°–â2.â1, angle
between AH and horizontal plane; â2, angle between
occlusal surface of maxillary molarsand horizontal plane;
â3, angle of laryngoscope blade levering motion; AH, axis of
handle; CH, chord corresponding to the radian formed by the proximal third of
the laryngoscope blade convex surface; E, distal end point of said radian; OS,
axis of occlusal surface of maxillary molars or gums.The modified Cormack-Lehane grading scale used to evaluate the
laryngoscopic findings obtained in the present study
Results
Seventeen adult male patients were studied, and no patients were
excluded from the analysis because of differences in the laryngoscopic view
grade. Mean patient age and body mass index were 28.1years (range 22–39years)
and 23.3 kg/m2 (range 20.5-26.8 kg/m2), respectively. In
all patients, the laryngoscopic view grades were virtually identical and grade
IIa or less with both blades, the study procedure lasted less than 120s, and
oxygen saturation remained greater than 97%. The values of the head extension
and LBLM angles (Fig. 4) were normally distributed.
According to the present data (Fig. 4 and Table
2), balloon laryngoscopy resulted in significantly
reduced head extension (P < 0.001) and LBLM
(P < 0.001).
Figure 4
Patient-by-patient values of the determined head extension and
laryngoscope blade levering motion angles. CMB, conventional Macintosh blade;
MMB, modified Macintosh blade.
Table 2
Values of the head extension and laryngoscope blade levering motion
angles during conventional and balloon laryngoscopy
Conventional Macintosh blade
Modified Macintosh blade
P
Angle of head extension
8.29 ± 1.57
4.91 ± 1.42
< 0.001
Angle of laryngoscope blade levering motion
10.76 ± 1.75
5.53 ± 2.13
< 0.001
Values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation in degrees.
P values were obtained by using the paired t-test.
Patient-by-patient values of the determined head extension and
laryngoscope blade levering motion angles. CMB, conventional Macintosh blade;
MMB, modified Macintosh blade.Values of the head extension and laryngoscope blade levering motion
angles during conventional and balloon laryngoscopyValues are expressed as mean ± standard deviation in degrees.
P values were obtained by using the paired t-test.
Discussion
In the current investigation, we determined the potentially beneficial
effects of the use of a curved blade modified to improve laryngeal
visualization by balloon inflation on the cervical spine motion and LBLM under
simulated cervical spine precautions. The present data showed a 40-50%
reduction in the head extension and LBLM angles with balloon laryngoscopy
(Table 2). This might be due to reduced need to manoeuvre
the modified blade while exposing the glottis.The estimated incidence of difficult laryngoscopy [grade
III or less (Table 1)] in general
surgery patients is approximately 1% [14]. The use of
neutral head position along with cervical spine stabilization manoeuvres has
resulted in an incidence of 4.3–16.6% [2,15]. The 0% incidence in the current study may be due to the
combined use of multiple difficult airway predictors during patient selection,
and the relatively small patient number (n = 17). Additionally, the
maintenance of oxygen saturation above 97% throughout the study procedure was
to be expected, because the safe duration of apnea tolerance in non-obese,
American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I patients exceeds 4min
[16].It seemed sensible to compare head extension and LBLM angles only if
laryngeal exposure was maximal and approximately identical during both
laryngoscopies in all patients. Maximal values would then be achieved in both
angles. If in some patients the larynx were partly (or not at all) exposed, the
head extension would probably be less than if the full view were obtained
[2]. Consequently, the head extension angles would be
falsely underestimated during the laryngoscopy with the least glottic exposure
[2]. The risk of this bias would increase in patients
with predicted difficult laryngoscopy. In such patients, conventional
laryngoscopy might result in lesser laryngeal exposure than is achieved with
balloon laryngoscopy [8]. Furthermore, the increased
difficulty in laryngeal visualization might result in excessive LBLM [6]
and subsequent overestimation of the 'conventional' LBLM angles.
Thus, we studied patients with 'easy' airways in order to maximize
the probability of obtaining satisfactory (grade II or
greater, Table 1) and similar laryngoscopic views with
both blades.External head extension angles during laryngoscopy with different
blades and with or without cervical spine stabilization have been measured in
two previous studies [2,3]. In the
study by Hastings and Wood [2], the head extension angles
for best laryngeal view during conventional laryngoscopy under manual head
immobilization (mean ± standard deviation 9 ± 6 °) were similar to
ours (Table 2). The smaller coefficient of variation
(defined as standard deviation/mean value) of the present results (0.19 versus
0.67 [2]) may be due to the following: all laryngoscopies
were performed by one experienced operator, whereas in the previous study
[2] 62 laryngoscopies were performed by 16 operators; and
the use of a hard collar for cervical spine stabilization, which has eliminated
the potential variability in angle measurements caused by differences in the
force applied by different assistants performing head immobilization [2].Head extension is the major external movement that occurs during
airway management [2]. Also, the externally measured head
extension angle during laryngoscopy has been correlated with the angle formed
between the occiput and the fourth cervical vertebra (r2
= 0.7) [3]. The maximum allowable head extension during
airway management of trauma victims and the actual risk of neurological
deterioration associated with conventional airway management techniques applied
in cervical spine-injured patients still remain to be determined, however.In the current study, we also determined the LBLM, which has not been
previously determined under simulated cervical spine precautions. LBLM was
defined by SDM and MJJ as the backward motion of the blade's convex
surface toward the maxilla. Its range was estimated by measuring the angle
between the occlusal surface axis of the maxillary molars and the chord of the
radian formed by the proximal one-third of the blade (Fig. 3). This chord is the best straight-line approximation to the
geometrical shape of the proximal one-third of the blade's convex
surface. This portion of the no. 4 blade is most frequently in close proximity
with the upper teeth of adult males during laryngoscopy, and may traumatize
them if excessive LBLM is employed. Upper incisor trauma and/or dislodgment may
then result in aspiration of tooth fragments into the trachea.In our opinion, the potential risks of spinal cord injury and of
maxillary teeth dislodgement during laryngoscopy performed in traumapatients
under cervical spine precautions should not be underestimated (especially in
the presence of unstable cervical spine injuries and/or maxillary trauma),
despite the fact that they have not yet been accurately determined.In summary, we demonstrated that the head extension and LBLM angles
are significantly reduced when balloon laryngoscopy is performed under
simulated cervical spine precautions in carefully preselected and adequately
anaesthetized and paralyzed elective surgery patients. Such 'ideal'
conditions may not be achievable in the emergency setting, however. Thus,
further investigation is required to prove the usefulness of balloon
laryngoscopy in the emergency airway management of cervical spine-injured
patients.