To determine whether IL-4 is therapeutic in treating established experimental arthritis, a recombinant adenovirus carrying the gene that encodes murine IL-4 (Ad-mIL-4) was used for periarticular injection into the ankle joints into mice with established collagen-induced arthritis (CIA). Periarticular injection of Ad-mIL-4 resulted in a reduction in the severity of arthritis and joint swelling compared with saline- and adenoviral control groups. Local expression of IL-4 also reduced macroscopic signs of joint inflammation and bone erosion. Moreover, injection of Ad-mIL-4 into the hind ankle joints resulted in a decrease in disease severity in the untreated front paws. Systemic delivery of murine IL-4 by intravenous injection of Ad-mIL-4 resulted in a significant reduction in the severity of early-stage arthritis.
To determine whether IL-4 is therapeutic in treating established experimental arthritis, a recombinant adenovirus carrying the gene that encodes murineIL-4 (Ad-mIL-4) was used for periarticular injection into the ankle joints into mice with established collagen-induced arthritis (CIA). Periarticular injection of Ad-mIL-4 resulted in a reduction in the severity of arthritis and joint swelling compared with saline- and adenoviral control groups. Local expression of IL-4 also reduced macroscopic signs of joint inflammation and bone erosion. Moreover, injection of Ad-mIL-4 into the hind ankle joints resulted in a decrease in disease severity in the untreated front paws. Systemic delivery of murineIL-4 by intravenous injection of Ad-mIL-4 resulted in a significant reduction in the severity of early-stage arthritis.
RA is a chronic systemic autoimmune disease that is characterized by
joint inflammation, and progressive cartilage and bone erosion. Currently the
symptoms of arthritis are managed using pharmacologic agents, including both
steroidal and nonsteroidal drugs, and disease-modifying drugs such as
methotrexate. No pharmacologic agents have yet proven effective in halting the
progression of disease, however. Recent research has identified certain
biologic agents that appear more able than conventional therapies to halt
effectively the progression of disease, as well as ameliorate disease symptoms.
In particular, inhibitors of TNF-α and IL-1 have proven effective in
clinical trials, and the US Food and Drug Administration has approved the use
of soluble TNF-α receptor for treatment of human RA. One potential problem
with the use of biologic agents for arthritis therapy is the need for daily or
weekly repeat dosing. The transfer of genes directly to the synovial lining can
theoretically circumvent the need for repeat dosing and reduce potential
systemic side effects [1,2].
Ex-vivo and in-vivo methods have been used to deliver therapeutic genes such as
those that encode IL-10, v-IL-10, soluble TNF and IL-1 receptors, and IL-1Ra to
arthritic mouse [10], rat [11],
dog [12], and rabbit joints [13].
Although many genes have been effective in treating murine CIA if they are
administered before disease onset, local periarticular gene transfer has not
been highly effective in halting the progression of established disease.IL-4, similar to TNF-α and IL-1 inhibitors, has been shown be
therapeutic for the treatment of murine CIA when administered intravenously as
a recombinant protein, either alone or in combination with IL-10. IL-4 can
down-regulate the production of proinflammatory and Th1-type cytokines by
inducing mRNA degradation and upregulating the expression of inhibitors of
proinflammatory cytokines such as IL-1Ra [3,4]. IL-4 is able to inhibit IL-2 and IFN-γ production by
Th1 cells, resulting in suppression of macrophage activation and the production
of the proinflammatory cytokines IL-1, IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α by monocytes
and macrophages [5,6,7,8,9]. In
addition, IL-4 inhibits growth factor-induced RA synoviocyte proliferation, and
expression of prostaglandin E and matrix metalloproteinase-3 in RA synovial
fibroblast [14,15,16], and reduces bone resorption. Given that IL-4 is able to
inhibit the production of both IL-1 and TNF-α, block synovial cell
proliferation and bone loss, and promote the formation of Th2 lymphocytes, it
represents an attractive cytokine for treating arthritis by gene transfer.To examine the therapeutic effects of local and systemic IL-4
expression in established CIA, we have generated an adenoviral vector carrying
the gene for murineIL-4 (Ad-mIL-4). The ability of Ad-mIL-4 to treat
established CIA was evaluated by local periarticular and systemic intravenous
injections of Ad-mIL-4 into mice at various times after disease onset. Local
injection of Ad-mIL-4 resulted in a reduction in the severity of arthritis and
joint swelling, and reduced macroscopic signs of joint inflammation and bone
erosion. Injection of the ankle joints in the hind legs also resulted in a
therapeutic effect in the untreated, front paws. A high level of endogenous
murine IL-10 was detected in the joint tissues of mice injected locally with
Ad-mIL-4. Systemic delivery of murineIL-4 by intravenous injection of Ad-mIL-4
also resulted in a slight delay in the onset of disease, with a significant
reduction in the number of arthritic paws. These results demonstrate that local
and systemic gene transfer of IL-4 is able to treat established and early-stage
disease, respectively, in a mouse model of arthritis, and thus may be useful
for clinical applications for the treatment of RA.
Materials and methods
Mice
Male DBA/1 lacJ (H-2) mice, aged 7-8 weeks,
were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory. They were maintained in a specific
pathogen-free animal facility of the University of Pittsburgh Biotechnology
Center. For local periarticular injection, mice were anesthetized with
inhalation of 2.5% isoflurane gas. A maximum of 5 μ l diluted adenovirus
was injected into joint articular space under the ankle joint bone in each hind
paw with a 26-gauge Hamilton syringe. For systemic delivery of adenovirus,
500μ l diluted adenovirus was injected intravenously via the tail
vein.
Vector construction and adenovirus generation
Ad-mIL-4 was constructed and propagated according to standard
protocols, as previously described [17]. Briefly,
recombinant adenoviruses were generated by homologous recombination in CRE8
cells, a 293 cell line that expresses Cre recombinase, between psi-5, an
Ad5-derived, E1- and E3-deleted adenovirus, and pAd-lox, the adenoviral shuttle
vector that expresses IL-4. The inserted cDNA sequences are expressed under the
transcriptional control of human cytomegalovirus promoter.Vectors were purified using two consecutive CsCl gradient
ultracentrifugation, dialyzed at 4°C against sterile virus buffer,
aliquoted, and stored at -80°C until use. The titers of the adenoviral
stocks were determined by incubating serial dilutions of the stocks at
37°C for 60 min with sub-confluent 293 cells. Viral titers were calculated
by determining the highest dilution that produced 100% viral cytopathic effect,
which was then multiplied by the number of cells per well and by the dilution
factor. CRE8 and 293 cell lines were grown in Dulbecco's modified eagle
medium (GIBCO-BRL, Rockville, MD, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine
serum.
Induction of arthritis
Bovine typeII collagen (Chondrex, Seattle, WA, USA) was dissolved in
0.05mol/l acetic acid at a concentration of 2mg/ml by stirring overnight at
4°C and emulsified in equal volumes of FCA containing 2mg/ml heat-killed
Mycobacterium tuberculosis strain H37Ra. The mice were immunized
intradermally at the base of tail with 100 μ g collagen. On day 21 after
priming, the mice were boosted with 100μ g type II collagen in incomplete
adjuvant. In order to synchronize the onset of arthritis, 40 μ g
lipopolysaccharide (Sigma) was injected intraperitoneally on day 28.
Disease evaluation
Disease severity was assessed every other day using an established
macroscopic scoring system ranging from 0 to 4: 0, normal; 1, detectable
arthritis with erythma; 2, significant swelling and redness; 3, severe swelling
and redness from joint to digit; and 4, maximal swelling with ankylosis. The
macroscopic score (mean ± standard deviation) was expressed as a
cumulative value for all paws, with a maximum possible score of 16. The
thickness of each paw was also measured using a spring-load caliper. The paw
swelling for each mouse was calculated by adding the four thicknesses of the
individual paws. In addition, the number of arthritic paws of individual mice
were counted and added to represent the number of arthritic paws in a group.
The in vivo experiments were performed with 10 mice/group and repeated
three times to ensure reproducibility.
Histologic examination
Joint tissues from freshly dissected mice were immersion-fixed in
10% neutral buffered formalin and decalcified in 15% ethylene diamine
tetra-acetic acid/30% glycerol for 2 weeks. Tissues were then dehydrated in
graded alcohols, embedded in paraplast, sectioned at 5μ m on a microtome,
and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Sections were evaluated in a blinded
manner for histologic signs of arthritis and scored as follows: 1, synovial
cell proliferation, synovial hypertrophy with villus formation and/or fibrin
deposition; 2, inflammation, synovitis and/or generalized inflammation; 3,
cartilage disruption, chondrocyte degeneration and/or ruffling of cartilage
surface and/or dystrophic cartilage; and 4, joint destruction, cartilage
erosion with abundant inflammation and pannus formation with bone erosion.
Type II collagen antibody titration
Serum level of antibody against type II collagen was measured using
a standard ELISA assay. Briefly, a 96-well Immuno-Maxisorp Plate (Nunc,
Naperville, IL, USA) was coated with bovine type II collagen (10 μ g/ml)
overnight at 4°C and blocked with 10% fetal bovine serum in
phosphate-buffered saline. Sample sera were diluted to 1:100000 (vol:vol) and
incubated for 2h at 37°C. After washing, bound antibody isotope was
detected with biotin-conjugated antimouse whole IgG (heavy and light chain)
antibody (Pharmingen, San Diego, CA, USA). Thereafter, plates were washed,
incubated with 100 μ l 2,2-azino-di-(-3-ethyl-benzthiazolinesulfonate)
substrate (ABTS; Boeringer Mannheim, Indianapolis, IN, USA) at 1mg/ml and read
at 405nm.
Cytokine production
Cytokine production in the joint tissue or serum was assessed by
ELISA (R&D systems). For measuring the cytokine production, peeled joint
tissues from the upper portion of ankle to the middle of the paw were ground by
homogenizer in the equal volume of the lysis buffer (100mmol/l potassuim
phosphate, pH 7.8 and 0.2% Triton-X 100). Cytokine production was standardized
as amount of cytokine per gram of tissue.
Statistical analysis
Results were compared using the Student's t-test and
by analysis of variance. P <0.05 was considered statistically
significant.
Results
Local delivery of Ad-mIL-4 in established CIA mouse model
To establish CIA, 8-week-old aged DBA1/lacJ male mice were immunized
with 100 μ g bovine type II collagen emulsified in complete adjuvant.
After 21 days, the mice were boosted with the same amount of collagen in
incomplete adjuvant, with disease pathology observed starting 28 days after
immunization. In order to synchronize the onset of arthritis,
lipopolysaccharide was injected intraperitoneally on day 28, excluding the mice
that had already showed signs of disease pathology. All of the
collagen-immunized mice had swollen and red paws and ankle joints within 3 days
after lipopolysaccharide injection.In order to examine the therapeutic effects of IL-4 gene transfer in
a murine model of arthritis, increasing doses of an Ad-mIL-4 recombinant virus
were administered by periarticular injection into the hind ankle joints of mice
with established disease 4 days after lipopolysaccharide injection.As shown in Figure 1, all mice had established
disease at time of injection. However, the severity of arthritis (Fig.
1a), paw thickness (Fig. 1b), and
the number of arthritic paws (Fig. 1c) were all
significantly reduced in the Ad-mIL-4 group, compared with the saline- and
Ad-eGFP-treated groups.
Figure 1
Local delivery of Ad-mIL-4. Three days after lipopolysaccharide
treatment collagen-immunized mice were injected periarticularly with
5×108 particles of Ad-mIL-4, Ad-eGFP, or saline. (a)
Arthritis index. Subsequently, severity of disease was assessed every other day
using an established macroscopic scoring system ranging from 0 to 4: 0, normal;
1, detectable arthritis with erythma; 2, significant swelling and redness; 3,
severe swelling and redness from joint to digit; and 4, maximal swelling with
ankylosis or necrosis. The average macroscopic score was expressed as a
cumulative value for all paws, with a maximum possible score of 16 per mouse
(n = 20). *P <0.01. (b) Paw swelling. The
thickness of each paw was also evaluated using a spring-load caliper. The paw
swelling for each mouse was calculated by adding the four thicknesses of the
individual paws. *P <0.1;**P
<0.05. (c) Number of arthritic paws. At the same time, the total
number of arthritic paws were determined for each experimental group
(n = 10, maximum 40 per group). *P <0.01.
Analysis of the bones in the ankle joints of control arthritic mice
showed evidence of erosion with an associated monocytic infiltrate around the
joint space (Fig. 2a) compared with the nonarthritic
control joints. In contrast, the joints from Ad-mIL-4-treated mice showed less
inflammatory joint tissue, reduction in bone erosion, and reduction in the
number of inflammatory cells. The changes in histology of the ankle joints from
sections from five mice per group were also scored in a blinded manner. As
shown in Figure 2b, significant inhibition of disease
progression as assessed by joint histology was observed in the Ad-mIL-4-treated
group.
Figure 2
Histological analysis of the effect of local Ad-mIL-4 treatment in
CIA. (a) Ankle joints of mice were isolated from CIA and same-aged
normal DBA mice 28 days after adenovirus injection. Ankle joint tissues were
stained with hematoxylin and eosin and showed 100× magnification.
Particles of Ad-IL-4 or Ad-eGFP (5×108) were injected into
ankle joints of mice with established CIA. (b) The joint tissue sections
were evaluated in a blinded manner and scored as follows: 1, synovial cell
proliferation, synovial hypertrophy with villus formation and/or fibrin
deposition; 2, inflammation, synovitis and/or generalized inflammation; 3,
cartilage disruption, chondrocyte degeneration and/or ruffling of cartilage
surface and/or dystrophic cartilage; and 4, joint destruction, cartilage
erosion with abundant inflammation and pannus formation with bone erosion. A
total of five joints per group were evaluated by at least two individuals in a
blinded manner.
These results suggest that local expression of IL-4 after gene
transfer to joints with established disease could effectively protect tissue
from inflammation as well as block bone erosion. It is important to note that
the possible inflammatory responses to adenoviral injection were examined by
injection of the same number of particles of Ad-mIL-4 and Ad-eGFP into
naïve joints of DBA mice. At the doses of virus used, however, no
inflammation was observed (data not shown).
Reduction in disease severity in noninjected front paws by local
injection of IL-4
Previously, we have noted a contralateral effect, in which treatment
of a diseased joint by adenovirus-mediated transfer of the gene that encodes
v-IL-10 resulted in a therapeutic effect in noninjected joints. To determine
whether Ad-mIL-4 was able to confer a contralateral effect, the severity of
disease in the hind and front paws of the mice injected only in the hind ankle
joints was evaluated. As shown in Figure 3a, a reduction
in the arthritis index was observed in the Ad-mIL-4 injected hind leg ankle
joints of the CIA mice. Interestingly, the noninjected front paws also showed a
statistically significant reduction in the severity of arthritis (Fig.
3b). Taken together, these results suggest that local
periarticular injection of Ad-mIL-4 resulted in a therapeutic effect in both
injected and noninjected joints. However, unlike v-IL-10, IL-4 is able to
confer a contralateral therapeutic effect in mice with established disease.
Figure 3
Periarticular injection of Ad-mIL-4 into the hind leg ankle joints
conferred a therapeutic effect in the untreated, front paws. The arthritic mice
injected in the hind leg ankle joints with Ad-mIL-4, Ad-eGFP or saline were
evaluated for the severity of arthritis in either the hind, treated paws
(a) or front, untreated paws (b). The macroscopic score (mean
± standard deviation) is expressed as a cumulative value for the two paws,
with a maximum possible score of 8.
Stimulation of endogenous IL-10 expression by local IL-4 gene
delivery
To test the level and duration of gene expression,
5×108 particles of Ad-mIL-4, Ad-mIL-10, and Ad-eGFP were
injected periarticularly into the ankle joints of naïve DBA1 mice. Joint
tissues were isolated at indicated time points, homogenized in lysis buffer,
and the lysates analyzed for cytokine production by ELISA. Maximal IL-4
expression was detected on day 7, with the level gradually decreasing over time
(Fig. 4a). However, it is important to note that it is
unclear whether the level of IL-4 detected in the joints at the different time
points is partially due to induction of endogenous IL-4. Interestingly, a high
level of murine IL-10 also was detected from the joint lysates of
Ad-mIL-4-injected animals (Fig. 4b) that directly
correlated with the dose of Ad-mIL-4 (data not shown). An increase in the level
of IL-10 expression could even be detected 3 weeks after injection of a high
dose of Ad-mIL-4.
Figure 4
Induction of IL-10 by Ad-mIL-4 administration. Particles of
Ad-IL-4, Ad-IL-10, or Ad-eGFP (5×108) were injected into the
ankle joints of naïve DBA mice. The animals were killed at the indicated
time points and joint tissue homogenized. The lysate was then monitored for
(a) murine IL-4 and (b) murine IL-10 using the appropriate
ELISA.
The levels of IL-4 and IL-10 expression also were examined in
arthritic mice treated with Ad-mIL-4 at day 35 after injection. As shown in
Figure 5a, a slight increase in IL-4 expression was
observed in that correlated with the dose of Ad-mIL-4 (Fig. 5a). A similar increase at day 35 was also observed in
naïve mice (data not shown). In addition, a significant dose-dependent
increase in the level of endogenous IL-10 35 days after Ad-mIL-4 administration
was observed in the CIA-treated animals (Fig. 5b). These
results demonstrated that IL-4 transgene expression was detectable for up to 5
weeks after Ad-mIL-4 delivery and that IL-4 was able to induce the production
of endogenous IL-10 in the joints of both naïve and immunized mice. In
addition, expression of IL-4 resulted in a twofold increase in the level of
endogenous IL-1Ra (data not shown). In contrast, periarticular injection of
Ad-mIL-10 did not affect the level of expression of endogenous levels of IL-4
(Fig. 4a) and IL-1Ra (data not shown). Taken together,
these results suggest that the therapeutic effects of exogenous IL-4 could be
mediated in part through the induction of endogenous IL-4 and IL-1Ra.
Figure 5
Levels of expression of IL-4 and IL-10 in immunized mice after
periarticular injection of diferent doses of Ad-mIL-4. Increasing doses of
Ad-mIL-4 were injected periarticularly into mice with established arthritis.
The animals were killed at day 35, and the joint tissue homogenized and assayed
for levels of (a) IL-4 and (b) IL-10. The doses of Ad-mIL-4 used
were as follows: low, 5×106; mid, 5×107; and
high, 5×108.
Delay of disease onset by systemic Ad-mIL-4 administration
The administration of recombinant IL-4 protein systemically has been
shown to be therapeutic in murine CIA models if given before onset of disease
onset. To examine the effect of systemic IL-4 delivered by gene transfer,
109 particles of Ad-mIL-4 were administered intravenously by tail
vein injection of the collagen-immunized mice on the day after
lipopolysaccharide injection. Whereas the immunized mice injected with Ad-eGFP
showed disease onset on day 3 after lipopolysaccharide injection, IL-4-treated
mice showed a delay in disease onset (Fig. 6a) as well as
a reduction in the total number of arthritic paws (Fig. 6c). In addition, seven out of the 15 Ad-mIL-4-treated mice
were disease-free for up to 10 days after lipopolysaccharide injection, and two
mice were disease free at the end of the experiment on day 65. In addition,
systemic injection of Ad-mIL-4 suppressed the severity of arthritis in the CIA
mice according to arthritis index (Fig. 6b). Thus,
systemic delivery of IL-4 by adenovirus-mediated gene transfer is able to
reduce the onset and severity of early-stage disease.
Figure 6
Systemic delivery of Ad-mIL-4. Adenoviruses were injected into the
tail vein 24 h after lipopolysaccharide treatment. (a) Arthritis index.
Subsequently, severity of disease was assessed every other day using an
established macroscopic scoring system ranging from 0 to 4: 0, normal; 1,
detectable arthritis with erythma; 2, significant swelling and redness; 3,
severe swelling and redness from joint to digit; and 4, maximal swelling with
ankylosis or necrosis. +The average macroscopic score was expressed as a
cumulative value for all paws, with a maximum possible score of 16 per mouse
(n =10). *P <0.001;**P
<0.0005. (b) Paw swelling. The thickness of each paw was also
evaluated using a spring-load caliper. The paw swelling for each mouse was
calculated by adding the four thicknesses of the individual paws.
*P <0.05; **P <0.001. (c)
Number of arthritis paws. The total number of arthritic paws were determined
for each experimental group (maximum 40 per group). *P
<0.001.
IL-4 and IL-10 expression in sera of CIA mice administered
Ad-mIL-4 systemically
To examine the duration of IL-4 expression as well as induction of
endogenous IL-10 expression, serum was collected from the mice and tested for
levels of IL-4 and IL-10 (Fig. 7). An elevated level of
IL-4 was detected in on day 7 (Fig. 7a) and on day 30
(Fig. 7c) after IL-4 injection. In addition, although
there was no observed increase in the expression of IL-10 in the sera at day 7
after systemic delivery of IL-4 (Fig. 7b), IL-10 was
elevated in the sera at day 35 (Fig. 7d). In contrast,
the levels of IL-4 and IL-10 in the saline or Ad-eGFP-treated control groups
were not significantly above background after either or local Ad-mIL-4
delivery. Thus, the early therapeutic effects of IL-4 after systemic delivery
most likely are not mediated by IL-10. In contrast, it is possible that the
therapeutic effects of IL-4 after local injection are conferred in part by
IL-10.
Figure 7
Serum IL-4 and IL-10 levels following systemic Ad-mIL-4 delivery
Ad-mIL-4 was delivered to mice by tail vein injection 30 days after
immunization. A week and 30 days after Ad-mIL-4 and Ad-eGFP injection, the mice
were bled and serum levels of cytokines measured by ELISA. (a) IL-4
secretion on day 7, (b) IL-10 secretion on day 7, (c) IL-4
secretion on day 30, and (d) IL-10 secretion on day 30.
Discussion
Gene therapy represents a novel approach for delivery of therapeutic
agents to joints in order to treat the pathologies associated with RA and
osteoarthritis, as well as other disorders of the joints. Previously, we and
others have shown that local ex vivo and in vivo gene
transfer of v-IL-10, IL-1Ra, IFN-γ, soluble IL-1 receptor, and soluble TNF
receptor are able to block certain intra-articular pathologies in rabbit, rat,
and murine models of arthritis. IL-4, like IL-10, is a Th2 cytokine that has
been demonstrated to be therapeutic for the treatment of arthritis after
systemic administration of recombinant protein.In the present study we examined the ability of local periarticular
gene transfer of IL-4 to treat established murine CIA. We demonstrated that
both local and systemic administration of Ad-mIL-4 resulted in a reduction in
the severity of established and early-stage arthritis, respectively, as well as
in the number of arthritic paws. In addition, the local gene transfer of
Ad-mIL-4 reduced histologic signs of inflammation as well as bone erosion.
Previous experiments have shown that gene transfer of IL-10 and IL-1 and TNF
inhibitors at the time of disease initiation (day 28) was therapeutic. However,
delivery of these agents after disease onset appeared to have only limited
therapeutic effect. In contrast, the present results demonstrate that local
IL-4 delivery was able partially to reverse progression of established disease
after local periarticular injection.Interestingly, local and systemic expression of IL-4 resulted in an
increase in the level of endogenous IL-10 as well as IL-1Ra. Previous reports
have shown that an additive or possible synergistic therapeutic effect can be
achieved in animal models of arthritis with combined treatment with recombinant
IL-4 and IL-10. Treatment of mice with IL-4 and IL-10 results in reduction in
TNF-α and IL-1β production with a concomitant shift in the
IL-1Ra:IL-1 ratio [18,19]. The
fact that the therapeutic effects of IL-4 and IL-10 are potentially synergistic
is possibly due to the fact that they suppress proinflammatory mediator
production through different mechanisms. IL-4 is able to block transcription of
TNF and IL-1 genes, whereas IL-10 stimulates degradation of TNF and IL-1β
mRNAs [20]. Thus, it is likely that the therapeutic
effects we observed after local injection of Ad-mIL-4 are due to both exogenous
IL-4 and endogenous IL-10 production. However, the delayed induction of IL-10
after systemic administration of Ad-mIL-4 suggests that the initial therapeutic
effects are not conferred by IL-10.A mechanism whereby IL-4 may alter IL-10 and IL-1Ra levels could
involve the regulation of transcription factors that regulate the respective
genes for these cytokines. In particular, nuclear factor-κ B and signal
transducer and activator of transcription-6 are important for conferring
transcriptional regulation by IL-4. Signal transducer and activator of
transcription-6, after tyrosine phosphorylation, can bind directly to nuclear
factor-κ B [21], resulting in synergic activation
in certain cell types.The present results suggest that gene transfer of IL-4 can stimulate
expression of endogenous cytokines, such as IL-10 and IL-1Ra, as well as
possibly endogenous IL-4 expression. Endogenous IL-10, which can be induced by
IL-4, is a natural suppressor of a number of inflammatory responses. Inhibition
of endogenous IL-10 with neutralizing antibodies enhanced endotoxic shock, IgG
immune complex-induced lung injury, and the severity of CIA [22,23,24,25]. Periarticular delivery of murine or viral IL-10 by gene
transfer resulted in the inhibition of CIA in mouse models [10,26] if delivered before or at the
time of disease onset. The present results are also consistent with the
observation that IL-4, but not IL-10, has been shown to enhance the production
of IL-1Ra by RA synovial cells [14,27].IL-4 is a potent mediator in shifting the balance of Th1/Th2 cells and
skewing the production of antibody subtypes [28]. Th2
effector cell differentiation also is dependent on the presence of IL-4 during
priming [29]. Blocking endogenous IL-4 using
neutralizing antibodies has been shown [30] to result
not only in the absence of T cells with a Th2-like phenotype, but also in the
appearance of T cells producing IL-2 and IFN-γ after restimulation. IL-4
is also able to skew the production of antibody subtype [28]. However, we have shown that anticollagen antibody levels
are already very high at day 30 after immunization and that IL-4 treatment did
not significantly change these elevated levels (data not shown). In addition,
we did not observe significant differences between IgG isotypes in the control
and Ad-mIL-4 treated mice (data not shown). Thus, the mechanisms through which
local and systemic IL-4 administration are able to suppress CIA are still
unclear.We have demonstrated previously that periarticular injection of
adenovirus-mediated gene transfer of v-IL-10 into the hind paws of mice with
early-stage arthritis was able to confer a therapeutic effect in the untreated
front paws. Similarly, administration of v-IL-10 into one knee of rabbits with
antigen-induced arthritis was able to confer a therapeutic effect in the
contralateral untreated knee. This observed contralateral effect was not
limited to v-IL-10, in that coadministration of adenoviral vectors expressing
soluble IL-1 and soluble TNF receptors also conferred a similar protective
effect to untreated knees. Although the mechanism of the contralateral effect
is unclear, we have demonstrated that adoptive transfer of dendritic cells from
animals treated with adenovirus-mediated gene transfer of v-IL-10 to untreated
immunized animals is able to confer a therapeutic effect (unpublished data).
Thus, it is possible that local expression of v-IL-10 or IL-1 and TNF
inhibitors modulates the activity of dendritic cells. However, although v-IL-10
is able to block early-stage disease, it is ineffective in reversing
established disease. In contrast, periarticular injection of Ad-mIL-4 was able
to reverse pathology in established disease not only in the treated hind paws,
but also in the untreated front paws. Interestingly, we have observed that
intravenous injection of naïve dendritic cells, genetically modified to
express IL-4, is able to effectively treat established arthritis by inhibiting
the Th1 response (unpublished data).During the preparation of this manuscript, a similar study using a
recombinant Ad-mIL-4 vector for treatment of murine CIA was reported [31].
However, the vector was administered before onset of disease into knee joints,
whereas the vector in the present study was injected after disease onset into
ankle joints. Similar to the present results, in that study local injection of
the recombinant Ad-mIL-4 vector resulted in a reduction in bone erosion and a
reduction in cartilage degradation. However, unlike the present results, no
effect on joint inflammation was observed. Moreover, in the present report we
demonstrated that both local and systemic injection resulted in induction of
endogenous IL-10. Given the ability of IL-4 to reverse established disease
partially, our studies, as well as those of others, support the potential
application of IL-4 gene therapy for the clinical treatment of RA.
Authors: J D Whalen; E L Lechman; C A Carlos; K Weiss; I Kovesdi; J C Glorioso; P D Robbins; C H Evans Journal: J Immunol Date: 1999-03-15 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: Y Ma; S Thornton; L E Duwel; G P Boivin; E H Giannini; J M Leiden; J A Bluestone; R Hirsch Journal: J Immunol Date: 1998-08-01 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: C Gérard; C Bruyns; A Marchant; D Abramowicz; P Vandenabeele; A Delvaux; W Fiers; M Goldman; T Velu Journal: J Exp Med Date: 1993-02-01 Impact factor: 14.307
Authors: Wenjin Li; Shasha Wu; Muzamil Ahmad; Jianfei Jiang; Hao Liu; Tetsuya Nagayama; Marie E Rose; Vladimir A Tyurin; Yulia Y Tyurina; Grigory G Borisenko; Natalia Belikova; Jun Chen; Valerian E Kagan; Steven H Graham Journal: J Neurochem Date: 2010-03-17 Impact factor: 5.372
Authors: Ana Claudia Araujo-Pires; Andreia Espindola Vieira; Carolina Favaro Francisconi; Claudia Cristina Biguetti; Andrew Glowacki; Sayuri Yoshizawa; Ana Paula Campanelli; Ana Paula Favaro Trombone; Charles S Sfeir; Steven R Little; Gustavo Pompermaier Garlet Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2015-03 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: T Shouda; T Yoshida; T Hanada; T Wakioka; M Oishi; K Miyoshi; S Komiya; K Kosai; Y Hanakawa; K Hashimoto; K Nagata; A Yoshimura Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2001-12 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Teal S Hallstrand; Ying Lai; William A Altemeier; Cara L Appel; Brian Johnson; Charles W Frevert; Kelly L Hudkins; James G Bollinger; Prescott G Woodruff; Dallas M Hyde; William R Henderson; Michael H Gelb Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2013-07-01 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Steven C Ghivizzani; Elvire Gouze; Jean-Noel Gouze; Jesse D Kay; Marsha L Bush; Rachael S Watson; Padraic P Levings; David M Nickerson; Patrick T Colahan; Paul D Robbins; Christopher H Evans Journal: Curr Gene Ther Date: 2008-08 Impact factor: 4.391
Authors: Fredrik Wermeling; Robert M Anthony; Frank Brombacher; Jeffrey V Ravetch Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2013-07-29 Impact factor: 11.205