Literature DB >> 11056185

Is there an optimal age for recovery from motor cortex lesions? I. Behavioral and anatomical sequelae of bilateral motor cortex lesions in rats on postnatal days 1, 10, and in adulthood.

B Kolb1, J Cioe, I Q Whishaw.   

Abstract

Rats were given bilateral lesions of the motor cortex on the day of birth (P1), tenth day of life (P10), or in adulthood. They were trained on several motor tasks (skilled forelimb reaching, beam traversing, tongue extension), general motor activity, and a test of spatial learning (Morris water task). Although all lesion groups were impaired at skilled reaching, the P10 group was less impaired than either of the other two lesion groups. Furthermore, on the other motor tests the P10 group did not differ from controls whereas both P1 and adult groups were impaired. Only the P1 lesion group was impaired at the acquisition of the Morris water task. Anatomical analyses revealed that the P1 and P10 rats had smaller brains than the other two groups as well as having a generalized decrease in cortical thickness. Dendritic analysis of layer III pyramidal cells in the parietal cortex revealed a decrease in apical arbor in the lesion groups and an increase in the basilar arbor of the P1 and adult lesion animals. The P1 and adult operated groups showed an increase in spine density in the basilar dendrites of layer V pyramidal cells. Finally, analysis of the pattern of corticospinal projections revealed that the P1 animals had a markedly wider field of corticospinal projection neurons than any of the other groups. The widespread anatomical changes in all lesion groups versus the relatively better behavioral recovery after P10 lesions suggests that day 10 represents an optimal period for adapting to brain damage and subsequent brain reorganization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11056185     DOI: 10.1016/s0006-8993(00)02828-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  7 in total

Review 1.  Is being plastic fantastic? Mechanisms of altered plasticity after developmental traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Christopher C Giza; Mayumi L Prins
Journal:  Dev Neurosci       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 2.  Preventive interventions for ADHD: a neurodevelopmental perspective.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Halperin; Anne-Claude V Bédard; Jocelyn T Curchack-Lichtin
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 7.620

Review 3.  Sensitive Periods for Recovery from Early Brain Injury.

Authors:  Bryan Kolb
Journal:  Curr Top Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022

4.  FGF-2-induced functional improvement from neonatal motor cortex injury via corticospinal projections.

Authors:  Marie H Monfils; Ira Driscoll; Romana Vavrek; Bryan Kolb; Karim Fouad
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-10-26       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Differential effects of neonatal norepinephrine lesions on immediate early gene expression in developing and adult rat brain.

Authors:  J D Sanders; H K Happe; D B Bylund; L C Murrin
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 3.590

6.  Margaret Kennard (1899-1975): not a 'principle' of brain plasticity but a founding mother of developmental neuropsychology.

Authors:  Maureen Dennis
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2009-10-29       Impact factor: 4.027

7.  Age and Mortality in Pediatric Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: Results from an International Study.

Authors:  Ajit Sarnaik; Nikki Miller Ferguson; A M Iqbal O'Meara; Shruti Agrawal; Akash Deep; Sandra Buttram; Michael J Bell; Stephen R Wisniewski; James F Luther; Adam L Hartman; Monica S Vavilala
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.210

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.