Literature DB >> 11055632

Effect of prenatal diagnosis on epidemiologic studies of birth defects.

J D Cragan1, M J Khoury.   

Abstract

Prenatal diagnostic technology makes it possible to offer women the option of electively terminating pregnancies affected by birth defects. Excluding these pregnancies from epidemiologic studies may affect study results. We explored this effect using examples from the literature. We calculated the bias in the odds ratio caused by excluding prenatally diagnosed pregnancies when the exposure of interest is not correlated with the likelihood of terminating an affected pregnancy and when it is correlated with an increase or decrease in this likelihood. We assumed that control infants did not have birth defects. When the exposure is not associated with the likelihood of a pregnancy termination, studies excluding terminations suffer a loss of precision. When the exposure is associated with an increase or decrease in this likelihood, the odds ratios are biased toward or away from the null, respectively. The magnitude of the bias will vary according to characteristics of the study population such as the prevalence of the exposure and the frequency with which prenatal diagnosis and elective termination are used. Whenever possible, pregnancies terminated after prenatal diagnosis must be included in epidemiologic studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11055632     DOI: 10.1097/00001648-200011000-00014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epidemiology        ISSN: 1044-3983            Impact factor:   4.822


  16 in total

1.  Exploring adoption with clients: the need for adoption education within the genetic counseling profession.

Authors:  Cassandra L Perry; Martha J Henry
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 2.  Pregnancy termination following prenatal diagnosis of anencephaly or spina bifida: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Candice Y Johnson; Margaret A Honein; W Dana Flanders; Penelope P Howards; Godfrey P Oakley; Sonja A Rasmussen
Journal:  Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol       Date:  2012-10-25

3.  Adjusting for bias due to incomplete case ascertainment in case-control studies of birth defects.

Authors:  Penelope P Howards; Candice Y Johnson; Margaret A Honein; W Dana Flanders
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Challenges in Studying Modifiable Risk Factors for Birth Defects.

Authors:  Sarah C Tinker; Suzanne Gilboa; Jennita Reefhuis; Mary M Jenkins; Marcy Schaeffer; Cynthia A Moore
Journal:  Curr Epidemiol Rep       Date:  2015-03

5.  Prevalence of associated extracardiac malformations in the congenital heart disease population.

Authors:  Alexander Egbe; Santosh Uppu; Simon Lee; Deborah Ho; Shubhika Srivastava
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 1.655

6.  Assisted Reproductive Technology and Birth Defects Among Liveborn Infants in Florida, Massachusetts, and Michigan, 2000-2010.

Authors:  Sheree L Boulet; Russell S Kirby; Jennita Reefhuis; Yujia Zhang; Saswati Sunderam; Bruce Cohen; Dana Bernson; Glenn Copeland; Marie A Bailey; Denise J Jamieson; Dmitry M Kissin
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 16.193

7.  Prepregnancy body mass index and spina bifida: Potential contributions of bias.

Authors:  Candice Y Johnson; Margaret A Honein; Sonja A Rasmussen; Penelope P Howards; Matthew J Strickland; W Dana Flanders
Journal:  Birth Defects Res       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 2.661

8.  Quantification of selection bias in studies of risk factors for birth defects among livebirths.

Authors:  Dominique Heinke; Janet W Rich-Edwards; Paige L Williams; Sonia Hernandez-Diaz; Marlene Anderka; Sarah C Fisher; Tania A Desrosiers; Gary M Shaw; Paul A Romitti; Mark A Canfield; Mahsa M Yazdy
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 3.103

9.  Prevalence of congenital anomalies in newborns with congenital heart disease diagnosis.

Authors:  Alexander Egbe; Simon Lee; Deborah Ho; Santosh Uppu; Shubhika Srivastava
Journal:  Ann Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2014-05

10.  Birth malformations and other adverse perinatal outcomes in four U.S. Wheat-producing states.

Authors:  Dina M Schreinemachers
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.