Literature DB >> 11054888

Topical treatment: which dressing to choose.

K G Harding1, V Jones, P Price.   

Abstract

Wounds have existed since the beginning of time. The interest in this subject has been stimulated in the main by conflict and war that have necessitated the development of new ways of managing wounds. In the 1960s the development of new materials that maintained a moist environment in the wound area encouraged a number of commercial companies to produce a wide variety of new materials with physical and chemical properties that might provide a moist environment. However the data to support the use of such materials are limited if one requires evidence that they have produced more rapid healing in chronic wounds kept moist as to those kept dry. Is this due to a problem with the outcome measure rather than a problem with the materials themselves? Rather than seeing this as justification for not using such materials, it should instead lead clinicians to question the validity of endpoint studies in wound healing experiments. There is a lack of evidence regarding the ability of such materials to improve the speed of healing in chronic wounds. Nevertheless considerable clinical experience, obtained from treating many patients, has indicated that not only are such new treatments cost effective, but that they are also proving to be extremely beneficial and acceptable to patients, on account of their ability to reduce pain, odour or leakage from a wound. Copyright 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11054888     DOI: 10.1002/1520-7560(200009/10)16:1+<::aid-dmrr133>3.0.co;2-q

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Metab Res Rev        ISSN: 1520-7552            Impact factor:   4.876


  9 in total

Review 1.  A general overview of burn care.

Authors:  Michel H E Hermans
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 2.  A dressing history.

Authors:  Douglas Queen; Heather Orsted; Hiromi Sanada; Geoff Sussman
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  An evidence-based review of split-thickness skin graft donor site dressings.

Authors:  Julie E Brown; Samantha L Holloway
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 4.  Reducing the incidence of foot ulceration and amputation in diabetes.

Authors:  Cynthia L Bartus; David J Margolis
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.810

5.  The debridement of hard to heal leg ulcers by means of a new device based on Fluidjet technology.

Authors:  Giovanni Mosti; Maria Letizia Iabichella; Pietro Picerni; Antonio Magliaro; Vincenzo Mattaliano
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.315

6.  Management of diabetic foot ulcers.

Authors:  Kleopatra Alexiadou; John Doupis
Journal:  Diabetes Ther       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 2.945

Review 7.  Smart Wound Dressings for Diabetic Chronic Wounds.

Authors:  Elizabeth Gianino; Craig Miller; Jordon Gilmore
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2018-06-26

8.  Efficacy of chitosan derivative films versus hydrocolloid dressing on superficial wounds.

Authors:  Ahmad S Halim; Fatimah M Nor; Arman Z Mat Saad; Nur A Mohd Nasir; Bachok Norsa'adah; Zanariah Ujang
Journal:  J Taibah Univ Med Sci       Date:  2018-11-17

9.  The Acceleration of Diabetic Wound Healing by Low-Intensity Extracorporeal Shockwave Involves in the GSK-3β Pathway.

Authors:  Rong-Fu Chen; Yun-Nan Lin; Keng-Fan Liu; Chun-Ting Wang; Savitha Ramachandran; Ching-Jen Wang; Yur-Ren Kuo
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2020-12-30
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.