Literature DB >> 11054733

Disciplining social psychology: a case study of boundary relations in the history of the human sciences.

J M Good1.   

Abstract

This paper explores the disciplinary status of social psychology through an analysis of the history of the boundary relations of psychology, sociology, and social psychology. After outlining some research on the nature of scientific disciplines, on the role of rhetoric in the constitution of disciplines, and on "boundary work," I consider the singular importance of social psychology as a discipline for the analysis of boundary relations, examining its units of analysis and its "disciplining." The boundaries of the disciplines of social psychology were seen as fluid, contingent, local, and contestable, reflecting the thematic preoccupations, disciplinary origins, and meta-theoretical commitments of social psychologists, of the parent disciplines, and of those who represent disciplinary practices. Copyright 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11054733     DOI: 10.1002/1520-6696(200023)36:4<383::aid-jhbs6>3.0.co;2-l

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hist Behav Sci        ISSN: 0022-5061


  1 in total

1.  What's so critical about Critical Neuroscience? Rethinking experiment, enacting critique.

Authors:  Des Fitzgerald; Svenja Matusall; Joshua Skewes; Andreas Roepstorff
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-30       Impact factor: 3.169

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.