Literature DB >> 11054320

The ice test versus the rest test in myasthenia gravis.

K C Kubis1, H V Danesh-Meyer, P J Savino, R C Sergott.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the ice test with the rest test in subjects with myasthenic and nonmyasthenic ptosis.
DESIGN: Randomized, noninterventional trial. PARTICIPANTS: (1) Ten subjects with ptosis from previously undiagnosed myasthenia gravis. (2) Fifteen subjects with nonmyasthenic ptosis.
METHODS: Application of ice compared with rest. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Improvement in eyelid elevation in millimeters after the application of a surgical glove filled with ice or cotton.
RESULTS: In myasthenic subjects, the median improvement of ptosis with the rest test was 2 mm and with the ice test was 4.5 mm. The difference between the rest and ice tests is significant (P: < 0.001). There was no improvement in ptosis in nonmyasthenic subjects with either test.
CONCLUSION: In myasthenic ptosis, improvement in eyelid elevation after the ice test is in part caused by rest. The ice test significantly improves ptosis more than rest alone does.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11054320     DOI: 10.1016/s0161-6420(00)00458-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  8 in total

1.  An Update on Myasthenic Crisis.

Authors:  Shafiuddin Ahmed; Jawad F Kirmani; Nazli Janjua; Ammar Alkawi; Ismail Khatri; Abutaher M Yahia; Nizar Souyah; Adnan I Qureshi
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.598

2.  Ocular Myasthenia: Clinical Course and the Diagnostic Utility of Assaying Acetylcholine Receptor Antibodies.

Authors:  Raed Behbehani; Abdullah Ali; Ashraf Al-Moosa
Journal:  Neuroophthalmology       Date:  2022-03-15

Review 3.  Update on myasthenia gravis.

Authors:  B R Thanvi; T C N Lo
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.401

4.  Evaluating the temperature effects of ice and heat tests on ptosis due to Myasthenia Gravis.

Authors:  Emmanuel Marinos; Katherine Buzzard; Clare L Fraser; Stephen Reddel
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 5.  Ocular myasthenia gravis: a review.

Authors:  Akshay Gopinathan Nair; Preeti Patil-Chhablani; Devendra V Venkatramani; Rashmin Anilkumar Gandhi
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.848

Review 6.  Controversies in Ocular Myasthenia Gravis.

Authors:  Amelia Evoli; Raffaele Iorio
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 4.003

Review 7.  Bedside and laboratory diagnostic testing in myasthenia.

Authors:  Katie Yoganathan; Alexander Stevenson; Awais Tahir; Ross Sadler; Aleksandar Radunovic; Naveed Malek
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 6.682

8.  Diagnostic value of repeated ice tests in the evaluation of ptosis in myasthenia gravis.

Authors:  Jun Young Park; Hee Kyung Yang; Jeong-Min Hwang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.