PURPOSE: A population-based cataract epidemiological study, the Reykjavik Eye Study, was conducted to determine the prevalence and characteristics of lens opacities in Iceland. The results were compared with those from previous surveys in Japan to determine the influence of race and environmental factors. METHODS: 1,635 randomly selected residents of Reykjavik, Iceland, were enrolled, and among them, 1,045 responded and took part in the study. The subjects received ophthalmological examination of both the anterior and the posterior segments. Changes in the crystalline lens were examined and photographed under maximal pupillary dilation. Classification of the opacity types and grading of the extent of lens opacificiation were done using a standardized scheme, and the data were analyzed with Student's test, the chi(2) test and the Mantel-Haenszel test. RESULTS: The prevalence of lens opacities in subjects in their 50s, 60s, 70s and in those 80 years and older was 42.7, 61.0, 85.3 and 100%, respectively. Grade II and III lens opacities were found in 2. 2% of subjects in their 50s and in 10.5, 35.9 and 62.3% in their 60s, 70s, and over 80 years, respectively. Cortical opacities predominated in all age groups followed by nuclear opacities; subcapsular opacities, on the other hand, were quite rare. A unique type of opacity, i.e., granular opacity, seldom seen among the Japanese, was found in 6.6% of the Icelandic subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that cortical opacity is the major type of opacity in Icelandic subjects, although its prevalence was lower than that in the Japanese subjects. Interestingly, the first appearance of lens opacities of grades II and III in Icelanders was delayed by 10 years compared to the Japanese suggesting fewer or less severe risk factors for cataract formation in Iceland. Copyright 2000 S. Karger AG, Basel.
PURPOSE: A population-based cataract epidemiological study, the Reykjavik Eye Study, was conducted to determine the prevalence and characteristics of lens opacities in Iceland. The results were compared with those from previous surveys in Japan to determine the influence of race and environmental factors. METHODS: 1,635 randomly selected residents of Reykjavik, Iceland, were enrolled, and among them, 1,045 responded and took part in the study. The subjects received ophthalmological examination of both the anterior and the posterior segments. Changes in the crystalline lens were examined and photographed under maximal pupillary dilation. Classification of the opacity types and grading of the extent of lens opacificiation were done using a standardized scheme, and the data were analyzed with Student's test, the chi(2) test and the Mantel-Haenszel test. RESULTS: The prevalence of lens opacities in subjects in their 50s, 60s, 70s and in those 80 years and older was 42.7, 61.0, 85.3 and 100%, respectively. Grade II and III lens opacities were found in 2. 2% of subjects in their 50s and in 10.5, 35.9 and 62.3% in their 60s, 70s, and over 80 years, respectively. Cortical opacities predominated in all age groups followed by nuclear opacities; subcapsular opacities, on the other hand, were quite rare. A unique type of opacity, i.e., granular opacity, seldom seen among the Japanese, was found in 6.6% of the Icelandic subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that cortical opacity is the major type of opacity in Icelandic subjects, although its prevalence was lower than that in the Japanese subjects. Interestingly, the first appearance of lens opacities of grades II and III in Icelanders was delayed by 10 years compared to the Japanese suggesting fewer or less severe risk factors for cataract formation in Iceland. Copyright 2000 S. Karger AG, Basel.
Authors: Mary Kay Margolis; Karin Coyne; Tessa Kennedy-Martin; Timothy Baker; Oliver Schein; Dennis A Revicki Journal: Pharmacoeconomics Date: 2002 Impact factor: 4.981
Authors: Andrew Bastawrous; Wanjiku Mathenge; Kevin Wing; Hillary Rono; Michael Gichangi; Helen A Weiss; David Macleod; Allen Foster; Matthew J Burton; Hannah Kuper Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2016-11-01 Impact factor: 4.799