Literature DB >> 11053818

Tricuspid valve replacement with the St. Jude Medical valve: 19 years of experience.

H Kawano1, T Oda, S Fukunaga, E Tayama, T Kawara, A Oryoji, S Aoyagi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The choice of the valve substitute in the tricuspid position remains controversial. A St. Jude Medical valve is a choice of valve substitute and its lower thrombogenicity and excellent hemodynamic performance have been reported even in the tricuspid position. However, little is known of the long-term durability of the St. Jude Medical valve in the tricuspid position. Our long-term experience of tricuspid valve replacement showed the higher thrombogenicity than we had expected, therefore, this study was done to reconsider our strategy for valve choice.
METHODS: This study reviewed 23 patient who underwent 25 tricuspid valve replacements with the St. Jude Medical valves from 1980 to 1997. The mean age was 40 years. Eleven patients (48%) were men. There were four in-hospital deaths (17%). The remaining 19 patients were all alive and followed from 2.2 to 19.0 years (mean 11.8 years).
RESULTS: The overall survival, including hospital mortality, was 83%, 10 and 15 years after surgery. Valve thrombosis occurred in six patients. Freedom from valve thrombosis was 78 and 70%, 10 and 15 years after surgery, respectively. The linearized rate of the valve thrombosis was 2.9%/patient-years. Six patients required reoperation. The mean interval to reoperation was 9.5 years. Freedom from reoperation was 83% and 75%, 10 and 15 years after surgery, respectively. The linearized rate of the reoperation was 2.8%/patient-years. No structural valve deterioration was found. Echocardiographic study showed that the function of the St. Jude Medical valve without valve-related complications was well maintained.
CONCLUSIONS: The higher thrombogenicity of the St. Jude Medical valve in the tricuspid position altered our choice of valve substitutes from the St. Jude Medical valve to a bioprosthesis which is lack of need for anticoagulant therapy except for juvenile patients who are able to maintain potent anticoagulant therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11053818     DOI: 10.1016/s1010-7940(00)00570-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  6 in total

Review 1.  Evidence-based surgical management of acquired tricuspid valve disease.

Authors:  Sung Ho Shinn; Hartzell V Schaff
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 32.419

2.  Transvenous transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation after bioprosthetic tricuspid valve failure.

Authors:  Ali Mortazavi; Ross M Reul; Leon Cannizzaro; Kathryn G Dougherty
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2014-10-01

3.  Management of recurrent mechanical prosthetic tricuspid valve thrombosis in the perioperative period of noncardiac surgery: a case report.

Authors:  Amena Hussain; Tudor Vagaonescu
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2012-06-12

4.  Tricuspid Valve Replacement, Mechnical vs. Biological Valve, Which Is Better?

Authors:  Haitham Akram Altaani; Saed Jaber
Journal:  Int Cardiovasc Res J       Date:  2013-06-01

5.  Ten-year experience of tricuspid valve replacement with the St. Jude medical valve.

Authors:  Xiliang Zhu; Yi Luo; Eryong Zhang; Qi An; Xijun Xiao; Li Dong; Yingqiang Guo; Ke Dian; Zhong Wu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Prosthetic tricuspid valve thrombosis: three case reports and literature review.

Authors:  Ahmad Yaminisharif; Mohammad Javad Alemzadeh-Ansari; Seyed Hossein Ahmadi
Journal:  J Tehran Heart Cent       Date:  2012-11-30
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.