F Materazzo1, S Cathcart, D Pritchard. 1. Pain Management Unit, Flinders Medical Center, Bedford Park, South Australia 5042, Australia. felicity.materazzo@fmc.sa.gov.au
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine if individuals in the general community with chronic headache or migraine differ in terms of anger, depression, and coping strategies and from headache-free individuals in terms of anger and depression. METHOD: A community sample comprising 16 chronic tension-type headache (CTH), 28 migraine headache (MH), and 38 headache-free control subjects (CNT) were compared on measures of anger, depression, and use of various coping strategies. Affective and coping measures, recorded during a headache-free period, were regressed on headache activity measured in a daily diary over the following 2 weeks. Relationships between anger, depression, and coping were also examined in each of the headache groups. RESULTS: The MH subjects were found to use less effective coping strategies than controls and CTH, while the CTH group had higher levels on depression and various anger scales compared to controls and MH. Direct positive relationships were observed between suppressed anger and depression in the MH group, and between trait anger and depression in the CTH group. Anger and coping were predictive of headache activity in the following 2 weeks for both MH and CTH groups, while depression and coping, compared to coping only, were predictive of lifestyle interference from head pain in MH and CTH, respectively. CONCLUSION: The results support a relationship between affective and coping factors in headache activity and adjustment.
OBJECTIVE: To determine if individuals in the general community with chronic headache or migraine differ in terms of anger, depression, and coping strategies and from headache-free individuals in terms of anger and depression. METHOD: A community sample comprising 16 chronic tension-type headache (CTH), 28 migraineheadache (MH), and 38 headache-free control subjects (CNT) were compared on measures of anger, depression, and use of various coping strategies. Affective and coping measures, recorded during a headache-free period, were regressed on headache activity measured in a daily diary over the following 2 weeks. Relationships between anger, depression, and coping were also examined in each of the headache groups. RESULTS: The MH subjects were found to use less effective coping strategies than controls and CTH, while the CTH group had higher levels on depression and various anger scales compared to controls and MH. Direct positive relationships were observed between suppressed anger and depression in the MH group, and between trait anger and depression in the CTH group. Anger and coping were predictive of headache activity in the following 2 weeks for both MH and CTH groups, while depression and coping, compared to coping only, were predictive of lifestyle interference from head pain in MH and CTH, respectively. CONCLUSION: The results support a relationship between affective and coping factors in headache activity and adjustment.
Authors: Stuart Cathcart; Navjot Bhullar; Maarten Immink; Chris Della Vedova; John Hayball Journal: Pain Res Manag Date: 2012 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 3.037