Literature DB >> 11052535

Visibility of the environmental noise modulating population dynamics.

E Ranta1, P Lundberg, V Kaitala, J Laakso.   

Abstract

Characterizing population fluctuations and their causes is a major theme in population ecology. The debate is on the relative merits of density-dependent and density-independent effects. One paradigm (revived by the research on global warming and its relation to long-term population data) states that fluctuations in population densities can often be accounted for by external noise. Several empirical models have been suggested to support this view. We followed this by assuming a given population skeleton dynamics (Ricker dynamics and second-order autoregressive dynamics) topped off with noise composed of low- and high-frequency components. Our aim was to determine to what extent the modulated population dynamics correlate with the noise signal. High correlations (with time-lag -1) were observed with both model categories in the region of stable dynamics, but not in the region of periodic or complex dynamics. This finding is not very sensitive to low-frequency noise. High correlations throughout the entire range of dynamics are only achievable when the impact of the noise is very high. Fitted parameter values of skeleton dynamics modulated with noise are prone to err substantially. This casts doubt as to what degree the underlying dynamics are any more recognizable after being modulated by the external noise.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11052535      PMCID: PMC1690746          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1220

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  5 in total

1.  Decadal trends in the north atlantic oscillation: regional temperatures and precipitation.

Authors:  J W Hurrell
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-08-04       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Population dynamics of Norwegian red deer: density-dependence and climatic variation.

Authors:  M C Forchhammer; N C Stenseth; E Post; R Langvatn
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1998-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Stochastic seasonality and nonlinear density-dependent factors regulate population size in an African rodent.

Authors:  H Leirs; N C Stenseth; J D Nichols; J E Hines; R Verhagen; W Verheyen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-09-11       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Global climate change and phenotypic variation among red deer cohorts.

Authors:  E Post; N C Stenseth; R Langvatn; J M Fromentin
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1997-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Mutation analysis of the Fanconi anaemia A gene in breast tumours with loss of heterozygosity at 16q24.3.

Authors:  A M Cleton-Jansen; E W Moerland; J C Pronk; C G van Berkel; S Apostolou; J Crawford; A Savoia; A D Auerbach; C G Mathew; D F Callen; C J Cornelisse
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 7.640

  5 in total
  10 in total

1.  The irreducible uncertainty of the demography-environment interaction in ecology.

Authors:  Niclas Jonzén; Per Lundberg; Esa Ranta; Veijo Kaitala
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-02-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Population growth rates: issues and an application.

Authors:  H Charles J Godfray; Mark Rees
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2002-09-29       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Red environmental noise and the appearance of delayed density dependence in age-structured populations.

Authors:  Lin Jiang; Nan Shao
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-05-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Phase-locking and environmental fluctuations generate synchrony in a predator-prey community.

Authors:  David A Vasseur; Jeremy W Fox
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-07-22       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  An updated perspective on the role of environmental autocorrelation in animal populations.

Authors:  Jake M Ferguson; Felipe Carvalho; Oscar Murillo-García; Mark L Taper; José M Ponciano
Journal:  Theor Ecol       Date:  2015-08-30       Impact factor: 1.432

6.  Predators reduce extinction risk in noisy metapopulations.

Authors:  James C Bull; Michael B Bonsall
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Relative importance of density-dependent regulation and environmental stochasticity for butterfly population dynamics.

Authors:  Piotr Nowicki; Simona Bonelli; Francesca Barbero; Emilio Balletto
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2009-05-30       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Estimating malaria transmission from humans to mosquitoes in a noisy landscape.

Authors:  Robert C Reiner; Carlos Guerra; Martin J Donnelly; Teun Bousema; Chris Drakeley; David L Smith
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 4.118

9.  Harvested populations are more variable only in more variable environments.

Authors:  Tom C Cameron; Daniel O'Sullivan; Alan Reynolds; Joseph P Hicks; Stuart B Piertney; Tim G Benton
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Environmental variability and population dynamics: do European and North American ducks play by the same rules?

Authors:  Hannu Pöysä; Jukka Rintala; Douglas H Johnson; Jukka Kauppinen; Esa Lammi; Thomas D Nudds; Veli-Matti Väänänen
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 2.912

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.