PURPOSE: To test the effects of implementing evidence-based postoperative pain management content and strategies on patient, provider (nurse and physician), and fiscal outcomes. SAMPLE: 118 patients, 57 before and 61 after implementation, having total knee replacement (TKR) (54%) and total hip replacement (THR) (45%), and 28 orthopaedic nurses. METHODS: A research utilization approach with a pretest/posttest design was used. Independent variables (interventions) included evidence-based pain management content, education of care providers and patients, and system changes at the point of care. Dependent variables (outcomes) were patient perception of the postoperative pain experience, provider practice patterns, and length of stay (LOS). FINDINGS: The hypotheses of decreased provider use of meperidine and increased use of hydromorphone, i.v. route, pain plans of care, and nurse knowledge were supported. LOS was significantly reduced. The patient hypotheses decreased pain intensity and side effects and increased satisfaction and function were not supported. CONCLUSION: Methodical implementation of evidence-based pain management information changed practice and fiscal outcomes. Improvement in the patient perception of pain management was more difficult to achieve.
PURPOSE: To test the effects of implementing evidence-based postoperative pain management content and strategies on patient, provider (nurse and physician), and fiscal outcomes. SAMPLE: 118 patients, 57 before and 61 after implementation, having total knee replacement (TKR) (54%) and total hip replacement (THR) (45%), and 28 orthopaedic nurses. METHODS: A research utilization approach with a pretest/posttest design was used. Independent variables (interventions) included evidence-based pain management content, education of care providers and patients, and system changes at the point of care. Dependent variables (outcomes) were patient perception of the postoperative pain experience, provider practice patterns, and length of stay (LOS). FINDINGS: The hypotheses of decreased provider use of meperidine and increased use of hydromorphone, i.v. route, pain plans of care, and nurse knowledge were supported. LOS was significantly reduced. The patient hypotheses decreased pain intensity and side effects and increased satisfaction and function were not supported. CONCLUSION: Methodical implementation of evidence-based pain management information changed practice and fiscal outcomes. Improvement in the patient perception of pain management was more difficult to achieve.