Literature DB >> 11050634

Staging of rectal cancer by double-contrast MR imaging using the rectally administered superparamagnetic iron oxide contrast agent ferristene and IV gadodiamide injection: results of a multicenter phase II trial.

A G Maier1, B Kersting-Sommerhoff, J W Reeders, W Judmaier, W Schima, A A Annweiler, M Meusel, N O Wallengren.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of double-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with rectal application of the superparamagnetic iron oxide contrast agent (SPIO) ferristene and IV gadodiamide for preoperative staging of rectal cancer. In a randomized phase II dose-ranging trial, 113 patients were studied preoperatively with one of four different formulations of ferristene (Abdoscan) as an enema before MRI. T1-weighted spin-echo (T1w SE) and T2w turbo spin-echo (TSE) single-contrast images were obtained as well as T1w SE and gradient-echo (GRE) double-contrast images after IV gadodiamide injection (Omniscan). Images were assessed qualitatively, and TNM tumor stage was compared with histopathology. High-viscosity ferristene formulations were superior to low-viscosity formulations in tumor staging (accuracy 90% vs 74%, P < 0.01). There was no significant difference between high and low iron content ferristene. MRI had a sensitivity of 97%, specificity of 50%, and accuracy of 82% for staging of rectal carcinoma higher than T2 stage. At receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis, MR differentiation between T1/T2 and T3/T4 tumor stages yielded a ROC index of 0.848. Double-contrast MRI is an accurate method for preoperative staging of rectal cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11050634     DOI: 10.1002/1522-2586(200011)12:5<651::aid-jmri1>3.0.co;2-r

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  7 in total

Review 1.  Management of colorectal cancers.

Authors:  R Lewis; A Flynn; M E Dean; A Melville; A Eastwood; A Booth
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2004-10

2.  Benefits of endoscopic submucosal dissection in rectal polyps are unclear.

Authors:  Aninda Chandra; Biju Aravind; Tarun Singhal; Abdulzahra Hussain
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Does gadolinium-based contrast material improve diagnostic accuracy of local invasion in rectal cancer MRI? A multireader study.

Authors:  Marc J Gollub; Yulia Lakhman; Katrina McGinty; Martin R Weiser; Michael Sohn; Junting Zheng; Jinru Shia
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Clinical relevance of morphologic MRI criteria for the assessment of lymph nodes in patients with rectal cancer.

Authors:  Fabian Doyon; Ulrike I Attenberger; Dietmar J Dinter; Stefan O Schoenberg; Stefan Post; Peter Kienle
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 5.  [Preoperative staging of rectal cancer].

Authors:  A-O Schäfer; T Baumann; G Pache; T Wiech; M Langer
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 0.635

6.  Development and validation of a high-resolution T2WI-based radiomic signature for the diagnosis of lymph node status within the mesorectum in rectal cancer.

Authors:  Gesheng Song; Panpan Li; Rui Wu; Yuping Jia; Yu Hong; Rong He; Jinye Li; Ran Zhang; Aiyin Li
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 5.738

7.  Application of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging and Histogram Analysis for Assessing Preoperative Stages of Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Hui Xie; Guangyao Wu
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 2.260

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.