Literature DB >> 11049976

Prognostic significance of CD56 expression for ALK-positive and ALK-negative anaplastic large-cell lymphoma of T/null cell phenotype.

R Suzuki1, Y Kagami, K Takeuchi, M Kami, M Okamoto, R Ichinohasama, N Mori, M Kojima, T Yoshino, H Yamabe, M Shiota, S Mori, M Ogura, N Hamajima, M Seto, T Suchi, Y Morishima, S Nakamura.   

Abstract

Anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) is a distinct entity of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, characterized by a proliferation of pleomorphic large lymphoid cells that express CD30. Recent studies have found that a subset of ALCL aberrantly expresses a chimeric anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) protein as a result of t(2;5)(p23;q35) or variant translocations. ALK-positive ALCLs feature good prognosis, but some of them lead to poor outcomes. Since CD56 is expressed in some ALCLs, its clinical significance was examined in a series of T/null cell type ALCLs. Of 143 patients, 83 (58%) showed ALK-positive staining, and of 140 patients, 25 (18%) expressed CD56. The ALK-positive subgroup was characterized by a younger age of onset (P <.0001), lower serum lactate dehydrogenase level (P =.01), better performance status (P =.03), less frequent extranodal involvement (P =.01), lower international prognostic index (IPI) categories (P =.002), and superior survival (P =.0009) in comparison with the ALK-negative group, suggesting that ALK is a specific marker defining a distinct subtype. CD56(+) cases showed a significantly poor prognosis overall (P =.002) as well as in both ALK-positive and ALK-negative subgroups (P =.02 and P =.04, respectively). Multivariate analysis confirmed that CD56 is independent of other prognostic factors, including IPI. Although CD56(+) cases showed a higher incidence of bone involvement, no other differences in clinicopathologic parameters were found between the CD56(+) and CD56(-) groups. These findings suggest that CD56 is not a marker to identify a distinct subtype of ALCL, but a strong clinical prognostic factor. Effective therapeutic approaches should be explored for high-risk ALCL patients, who can be identified by means of a prognostic model, including CD56.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11049976

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood        ISSN: 0006-4971            Impact factor:   22.113


  35 in total

Review 1.  Treatment of T-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Authors:  Andrew M Evens; Ronald B Gartenhaus
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2004-08

Review 2.  Update: peripheral T-cell lymphomas.

Authors:  Kerry J Savage
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.952

Review 3.  ALK-positive large B-cell lymphoma: identification of EML4-ALK and a review of the literature focusing on the ALK immunohistochemical staining pattern.

Authors:  Kana Sakamoto; Hideki Nakasone; Yuki Togashi; Seiji Sakata; Naoko Tsuyama; Satoko Baba; Akito Dobashi; Reimi Asaka; Chien-Chen Tsai; Shih-Sung Chuang; Koji Izutsu; Yoshinobu Kanda; Kengo Takeuchi
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2016-01-18       Impact factor: 2.490

Review 4.  Pathobiology of ALK+ anaplastic large-cell lymphoma.

Authors:  Hesham M Amin; Raymond Lai
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  CD56 expression in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia is associated with non-thymic phenotype and resistance to induction therapy but no inferior survival after risk-adapted therapy.

Authors:  Lars Fischer; Nicola Gökbuget; Stefan Schwartz; Thomas Burmeister; Harald Rieder; Monika Brüggemann; Dieter Hoelzer; Eckhard Thiel
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2008-12-23       Impact factor: 9.941

6.  Linkage of expression of chemokine receptors (CXCR3 and CCR4) and cytotoxic molecules in peripheral T cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified and ALK-negative anaplastic large cell lymphoma.

Authors:  Naoko Asano; Ritsuro Suzuki; Koichi Ohshima; Yoshitoyo Kagami; Fumihiro Ishida; Tadashi Yoshino; Hiroshi Ogawa; Yasuo Morishima; Shigeo Nakamura
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 2.490

7.  Epstein-Barr virus positive anaplastic large cell lymphoma: myth or reality?

Authors:  Ly Ma; Youval Katz; Kanu P Sharan; Roland Schwarting; Annette S Kim
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2010-11-20

8.  Prognostic significance of CD7+CD56+ phenotype and chromosome 5 abnormalities for acute myeloid leukemia M0.

Authors:  Ritsuro Suzuki; Makoto Murata; Masahiro Kami; Shigeki Ohtake; Norio Asou; Yoshihisa Kodera; Masao Tomonaga; Yasufumi Masaki; Shuya Kusumoto; Jin Takeuchi; Shin Matsuda; Hisamaru Hirai; m Seiichi Yorimitsu; Nobuyuki Hamajima; Masao Seto; Masanori Shimoyama; Ryuzo Ohno; Yasuo Morishima; Shigeo Nakamura
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.490

9.  Spectrum of CD30+ lymphoid proliferations in the eyelid lymphomatoid papulosis, cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma, and anaplastic large cell lymphoma.

Authors:  R Krishna Sanka; Ralph C Eagle; Ted H Wojno; Kenneth R Neufeld; Hans E Grossniklaus
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2009-12-06       Impact factor: 12.079

10.  Primary systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma in a single Korean institution: clinical characteristics and treatment outcome.

Authors:  Sook Ryun Park; Ji Yeon Baek; Dong-Wan Kim; Seok-Ah Im; Tae-You Kim; Yung-Jue Bang; Noe Kyeong Kim; Yoon Kyung Jeon; Chul Woo Kim; Dae Seog Heo
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.153

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.