Literature DB >> 11049883

A comparison of the effects of propofol and midazolam on memory during two levels of sedation by using target-controlled infusion.

A de Roode1, J M van Gerven, R C Schoemaker, F H Engbers, W Olieman, J R Kroon, A F Cohen, J G Bovill.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: We examined memory during sedation with target-controlled infusions of propofol and midazolam in a double-blinded five-way, cross-over study in 10 volunteers. Each active drug infusion was targeted to sedation level 1 (asleep) and level 4 (lethargic) as determined with the Observer Assessment of Alertness/Sedation scale. At the target level of sedation, drug concentration was clamped for 30 min, during which time neutral words were presented. After 2 h, explicit memory was assessed by recall, and implicit memory by using a wordstem completion test. Venous drug concentrations (mean +/- SD) were 1350 ng/mL (+/-332 ng/mL) for propofol and 208 ng/mL (+/-112 ng/mL) for midazolam during Observer Assessment of Alertness/Sedation scale level 4; and 1620 ng/mL (+/-357 ng/mL) and 249 ng/mL (+/-82 ng/mL) respectively during level 1. The wordstem completion test frequencies at low level sedation were significantly higher than spontaneous frequencies (8.7% + 2.4%; P: < 0.05 in all cases), and lower than during placebo (33.6% + 23%) (P: < 0.05 in all cases, except P: = 0.076 for propofol at level 4). Clinically distinct levels of sedation were accompanied by small differences in venous propofol or midazolam concentrations. This indicates steep concentration-effect relationships. Neutral information is still memorized during low-level sedation with both drugs. The memory effect of propofol and midazolam did not differ significantly. IMPLICATIONS: Implicit memory can occur during different states of consciousness and might lead to psychological damage. In 10 volunteers, implicit memory was investigated during sedation with propofol and midazolam in a double-blinded, placebo-controlled study. To compare the effects of both drugs, they were titrated using a computer-controlled infusion system to produce similar high and low levels of sedation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11049883     DOI: 10.1097/00000539-200011000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  4 in total

1.  Pain management after lumbar spinal fusion surgery using continuous subcutaneous infusion of buprenorphine.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Kawamata; Yasumitsu Sato; Yukitoshi Niiyama; Keiichi Omote; Akiyoshi Namiki
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.078

2.  Propofol infusion for sedation during spinal anesthesia.

Authors:  Tomoki Nishiyama
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2007-05-30       Impact factor: 2.078

3.  A comparison of equisedative infusions of propofol and midazolam for conscious sedation during spinal anesthesia - a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Abhiruchi Patki; V C Shelgaonkar
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2011-01

4.  Potential impact of propofol immediately after motor vehicle accident on later symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder at 6-month follow up: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Masato Usuki; Yutaka Matsuoka; Daisuke Nishi; Naohiro Yonemoto; Kenta Matsumura; Yasuhiro Otomo; Yoshiharu Kim; Shigenobu Kanba
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2012-10-28       Impact factor: 9.097

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.