Literature DB >> 11049823

Evaluation and use of epidemiological evidence for environmental health risk assessment: WHO guideline document.

.   

Abstract

Environmental health risk assessment is increasingly being used in the development of environmental health policies, public health decision making, the establishment of environmental regulations, and research planning. The credibility of risk assessment depends, to a large extent, on the strength of the scientific evidence on which it is based. It is, therefore, imperative that the processes and methods used to evaluate the evidence and estimate health risks are clear, explicit, and based on valid epidemiological theory and practice. Epidemiological Evidence for Environmental Health Risk Assessment is a World Health Organization (WHO) guideline document. The primary target audiences of the guidelines are expert review groups that WHO (or other organizations) might convene in the future to evaluate epidemiological evidence on the health effects of environmental factors. These guidelines identify a set of processes and general approaches to assess available epidemiological information in a clear, consistent, and explicit manner. The guidelines should also help in the evaluation of epidemiological studies with respect to their ability to support risk assessment and, consequently, risk management. Conducting expert reviews according to such explicit guidelines would make health risk assessment and subsequent risk management and risk communication processes more readily understood and likely to be accepted by policymakers and the public. It would also make the conclusions reached by reviews more readily acceptable as a basis for future WHO guidelines and other recommendations, and would provide a more rational basis for setting priorities for future research.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11049823      PMCID: PMC1240136          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.00108997

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  8 in total

1.  Health impact assessment--theory into practice.

Authors:  A Scott-Samuel
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  THE ENVIRONMENT AND DISEASE: ASSOCIATION OR CAUSATION?

Authors:  A B HILL
Journal:  Proc R Soc Med       Date:  1965-05

3.  Use and misuse of population attributable fractions.

Authors:  B Rockhill; B Newman; C Weinberg
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 4.  Conceptual problems in the definition and interpretation of attributable fractions.

Authors:  S Greenland; J M Robins
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Quantitative methods in the review of epidemiologic literature.

Authors:  S Greenland
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 6.222

6.  Epidemiology faces its limits.

Authors:  G Taubes
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-07-14       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Epidemiology and quantitative risk assessment: a bridge from science to policy.

Authors:  I Hertz-Picciotto
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  The place of epidemiology in environmental decisions: needed support for the development of risk assessment policy.

Authors:  R R Neutra; D Trichopoulos
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 9.031

  8 in total
  11 in total

1.  Prospective health impact assessment: pitfalls, problems, and possible ways forward.

Authors:  J Parry; A Stevens
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-11-17

2.  Health impact assessment of environmental tobacco smoke in European children: sudden infant death syndrome and asthma episodes.

Authors:  Elena Boldo; Sylvia Medina; Mattias Oberg; Vladimíra Puklová; Odile Mekel; Kristiina Patja; Dafina Dalbokova; Michal Krzyzanowski; Manuel Posada
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2010 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.792

3.  Is the caregivers' oral health related to dental caries in children or adolescents? A systematic review.

Authors:  Mônica Gentil Mattos; Clarissa Avelar Fernandez; Danielle Masterson; Lucianne Cople Maia; Aline de Almeida Neves
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Environmental health risk assessment of sulfur dioxide (SO2) at workers around in combined cycle power plant (CCPP).

Authors:  Shofi Nurhisanah; Hamzah Hasyim
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-05-06

Review 5.  The association between proximity to animal feeding operations and community health: a systematic review.

Authors:  Annette M O'Connor; Brent Auvermann; Danelle Bickett-Weddle; Steve Kirkhorn; Jan M Sargeant; Alejandro Ramirez; Susanna G Von Essen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Development of a quantitative methodology to assess the impacts of urban transport interventions and related noise on well-being.

Authors:  Matthias Braubach; Myriam Tobollik; Pierpaolo Mudu; Rosemary Hiscock; Dimitris Chapizanis; Denis A Sarigiannis; Menno Keuken; Laura Perez; Marco Martuzzi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 7.  Updated systematic review: associations between proximity to animal feeding operations and health of individuals in nearby communities.

Authors:  Annette M O'Connor; Brent W Auvermann; Rungano S Dzikamunhenga; Julie M Glanville; Julian P T Higgins; Shelley P Kirychuk; Jan M Sargeant; Sarah C Totton; Hannah Wood; Susanna G Von Essen
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2017-04-18

8.  Health impact assessment of particulate pollution in Tallinn using fine spatial resolution and modeling techniques.

Authors:  Hans Orru; Erik Teinemaa; Taavi Lai; Tanel Tamm; Marko Kaasik; Veljo Kimmel; Kati Kangur; Eda Merisalu; Bertil Forsberg
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2009-03-03       Impact factor: 5.984

Review 9.  A framework for integrated environmental health impact assessment of systemic risks.

Authors:  David J Briggs
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2008-11-27       Impact factor: 5.984

10.  Guidelines to evaluate human observational studies for quantitative risk assessment.

Authors:  Jelle Vlaanderen; Roel Vermeulen; Dick Heederik; Hans Kromhout
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2008-08-12       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.