C J Slawecki1, M Betancourt, T K Li, C L Ehlers. 1. The Scripps Research Institute, Department of Neuropharmacoloy, La Jolla, California 92037, USA. cslawecki@scripps.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Specific neurophysiological profiles, such as reduced P300 amplitude or altered spectral power in the EEG, have been associated with a risk for alcoholism in several clinical populations. In certain rodent models, high versus low alcohol consumption is associated with similar neurophysiological differences. For example, alcohol-preferring (P) rats have increased spectral power and decreased P300 amplitudes compared with alcohol-nonpreferring (NP) rats. In the present study, the neurophysiological profiles of high-alcohol-drinking (HAD) and low-alcohol-drinking (LAD) rats were assessed (1) to determine if their electrophysiological profiles are similar to P and NP rats and (2) to examine the relationship of these neurophysiological indices to ethanol drinking. METHODS: Ethanol-naive HAD and LAD rats were implanted with cortical and amygdalar recording electrodes. Baseline EEG and event-related potentials (ERPs) then were assessed. Subsequently, all rats were trained to self-administer ethanol by using a sucrose-substitution procedure. RESULTS: Baseline EEG and ERP (i.e., pre-ethanol exposure) were assessed based on line (HAD versus LAD) and actual ethanol consumption (high drinkers versus low drinkers). At baseline, ethanol-naive HAD rats displayed significantly greater power in the cortical EEG and decreased amygdala N1 ERP amplitude compared with ethanol-naive LAD rats. Similar EEG and ERP profiles have been observed when P and NP rats are compared. No differences in P300 between lines were observed, but high-drinking rats, independent of line, had significantly decreased P300 amplitude in the amygdala compared with low-drinking rats. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest there are some similarities in EEG and ERP profiles of P and HAD rats compared with NP and LAD rats. Furthermore, the data suggest that decreased P300 amplitude in the amygdala is associated with increased limited access ethanol drinking.
BACKGROUND: Specific neurophysiological profiles, such as reduced P300 amplitude or altered spectral power in the EEG, have been associated with a risk for alcoholism in several clinical populations. In certain rodent models, high versus low alcohol consumption is associated with similar neurophysiological differences. For example, alcohol-preferring (P) rats have increased spectral power and decreased P300 amplitudes compared with alcohol-nonpreferring (NP) rats. In the present study, the neurophysiological profiles of high-alcohol-drinking (HAD) and low-alcohol-drinking (LAD) rats were assessed (1) to determine if their electrophysiological profiles are similar to P and NP rats and (2) to examine the relationship of these neurophysiological indices to ethanol drinking. METHODS:Ethanol-naive HAD and LAD rats were implanted with cortical and amygdalar recording electrodes. Baseline EEG and event-related potentials (ERPs) then were assessed. Subsequently, all rats were trained to self-administer ethanol by using a sucrose-substitution procedure. RESULTS: Baseline EEG and ERP (i.e., pre-ethanol exposure) were assessed based on line (HAD versus LAD) and actual ethanol consumption (high drinkers versus low drinkers). At baseline, ethanol-naive HAD rats displayed significantly greater power in the cortical EEG and decreased amygdala N1 ERP amplitude compared with ethanol-naive LAD rats. Similar EEG and ERP profiles have been observed when P and NP rats are compared. No differences in P300 between lines were observed, but high-drinking rats, independent of line, had significantly decreased P300 amplitude in the amygdala compared with low-drinking rats. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest there are some similarities in EEG and ERP profiles of P and HAD rats compared with NP and LAD rats. Furthermore, the data suggest that decreased P300 amplitude in the amygdala is associated with increased limited access ethanol drinking.