Literature DB >> 11045799

Participation in a sigmoidoscopic colorectal cancer screening program: a pilot study.

S P Kremers1, I Mesters, I E Pladdet, B van den Borne, R W Stockbrügger.   

Abstract

At present, very little is known about the determinants of endoscopic screening participation. This study presents an analysis of the psychosocial associations of participation and nonparticipation in a sigmoidoscopic colorectal cancer screening program. The present pilot study was executed among members of a Dutch target group, ages 50-60 years, who visited an internal medicine outpatient clinic. Individuals who were asked to participate in the program (n = 200) received general information with regard to the screening procedure. The participation rate was 45%. Persons who participated in the screening program as well as those who wanted to participate in the study but did not want to participate in the screening program were asked to fill out a questionnaire. Self-efficacy, i.e., the individual's perception of the difficulty of participating in the screening program, appeared to be the most important association of participation. Furthermore, response efficacy, i.e., the individual's beliefs about the outcome of participation, and social support proved to be concepts that were associated with participation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11045799

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  11 in total

Review 1.  Individual-level factors in colorectal cancer screening: a review of the literature on the relation of individual-level health behavior constructs and screening behavior.

Authors:  Marc T Kiviniemi; Alyssa Bennett; Marie Zaiter; James R Marshall
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 3.894

2.  Facilitating factors for colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Corey H Brouse; Randi L Wolf; Charles E Basch
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2008 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Acceptance of flexible sigmoidoscopy as a screening examination for colorectal cancer in an outpatient clinic.

Authors:  S Gölder; W Vogt; H Lichti; H C Rath; A Kullmann; J Schölmerich; F Kullmann
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2006-07-04       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Impact of a Multifaceted Intervention on Promoting Adherence to Screening Colonoscopy Among Persons in HIV Primary Care: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Pansy Ferron; Shihab S Asfour; Lisa R Metsch; Michael H Antoni; Allan E Rodriguez; Robert Duncan; Sheila M Findlay
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 4.689

5.  Longitudinal predictors of colorectal cancer screening among participants in a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Caitlin C Murphy; Sally W Vernon; Nicole M Haddock; Melissa L Anderson; Jessica Chubak; Beverly B Green
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2014-06-15       Impact factor: 4.018

Review 6.  Does colorectal cancer risk perception predict screening behavior? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Thomas M Atkinson; Talya Salz; Kaitlin K Touza; Yuelin Li; Jennifer L Hay
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2015-08-18

7.  Integrating men's health and masculinity theories to explain colorectal cancer screening behavior.

Authors:  Shannon M Christy; Catherine E Mosher; Susan M Rawl
Journal:  Am J Mens Health       Date:  2013-06-27

Review 8.  Screening and vaccination as determined by the Social Ecological Model and the Theory of Triadic Influence: a systematic review.

Authors:  Anayawa Nyambe; Guido Van Hal; Jarl K Kampen
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Training residents to employ self-efficacy-enhancing interviewing techniques: randomized controlled trial of a standardized patient intervention.

Authors:  Anthony Jerant; Richard L Kravitz; Rahman Azari; Lynda White; Jorge A García; Heather Vierra; Maria Catrina Virata; Peter Franks
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2009-03-19       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Knowledge, attitudes and practices of cervical cancer prevention among Zambian women and men.

Authors:  Anayawa Nyambe; Jarl K Kampen; Stridutt K Baboo; Guido Van Hal
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2019-05-04       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.