Literature DB >> 11045795

Ovarian cancer tumor marker behavior in asymptomatic healthy women: implications for screening.

C Crump1, M W McIntosh, N Urban, G Anderson, B Y Karlan.   

Abstract

Ovarian cancer screening protocols generally have been limited by inadequate recognition of the normal behavior of tumor markers in women at risk of ovarian cancer. We have characterized the behavior of five serum tumor markers in a large cohort of healthy women and examined the implications for screening. Serial measurements of CA125, HER-2/neu, urinary gonadotropin peptide, lipid-associated sialic acid, and Dianon marker 70/K were obtained during 6 years of follow-up of 1257 healthy women at high risk of ovarian cancer. We analyzed individual-specific tumor marker behavior and explored methods that can exploit this information to develop individual-specific screening rules. These five tumor markers behaved approximately independently. Substantial heterogeneity was observed among women in the behavior of each tumor marker, particularly CA125. Intraclass correlation (ICC), or the proportion of total variability that occurs between individuals, was approximately 0.6 for log-transformed CA125 and urinary gonadotropin peptide, and less than 0.4 for the other markers. This degree of tumor marker heterogeneity among healthy women, and the relative independence of these markers, has important implications for screening and diagnostic tests. Independence of markers results in the clinically useful fact that the combined false positive rate from screening with multiple markers may be estimated by the sum of individual false positive rates. Heterogeneity of tumor marker patterns in healthy women implies that a fixed screening cutoff level is suboptimal to a degree that depends strongly on ICC. Using information on longitudinal measurements and ICC, individual-specific screening rules may be developed with the potential to improve early detection of ovarian cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11045795

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  9 in total

1.  Biomarker validation by targeted mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Martin McIntosh; Matthew Fitzgibbon
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 54.908

2.  The epidemiology of CA-125 in women without evidence of ovarian cancer in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer (PLCO) Screening Trial.

Authors:  Christine C Johnson; Bruce Kessel; Thomas L Riley; Lawrence R Ragard; Craig R Williams; Jian-Lun Xu; Saundra S Buys
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2008-06-30       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  Factors associated with serum CA125 level in women without ovarian cancer in the United States: a population-based study.

Authors:  Xiao Hu; Jingzhou Zhang; Yu Cao
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-05-14       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Combining CA 125 and SMR serum markers for diagnosis and early detection of ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  M W McIntosh; C Drescher; B Karlan; N Scholler; N Urban; K E Hellstrom; I Hellstrom
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.482

5.  Longitudinal screening algorithm that incorporates change over time in CA125 levels identifies ovarian cancer earlier than a single-threshold rule.

Authors:  Charles W Drescher; Chirag Shah; Jason Thorpe; Kathy O'Briant; Garnet L Anderson; Christine D Berg; Nicole Urban; Martin W McIntosh
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-12-17       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Factors influencing serum concentration of CA125 and CA15-3 in Iranian healthy postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Alamtaj Samsami Dehaghani; Alireza Fotouhi Ghiam; Marjan Hosseini; Sareh Mansouri; Abbas Ghaderi
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2007-12-25       Impact factor: 3.201

Review 7.  Genomic and proteomic biomarkers for cancer: a multitude of opportunities.

Authors:  Michael A Tainsky
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2009-05-04

8.  Combination of CA125 and RECAF biomarkers for early detection of ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Janneta Tcherkassova; Carolina Abramovich; Rafael Moro; Chen Chen; Ralph Schmit; Angela Gerber; Ricardo Moro
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2011-05-28

9.  Correlates of circulating ovarian cancer early detection markers and their contribution to discrimination of early detection models: results from the EPIC cohort.

Authors:  Renée T Fortner; Allison F Vitonis; Helena Schock; Anika Hüsing; Theron Johnson; Raina N Fichorova; Titilayo Fashemi; Hidemi S Yamamoto; Anne Tjønneland; Louise Hansen; Kim Overvad; Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault; Marina Kvaskoff; Gianluca Severi; Heiner Boeing; Antonia Trichopoulou; Vassiliki Benetou; Carlo La Vecchia; Domenico Palli; Sabina Sieri; Rosario Tumino; Giuseppe Matullo; Amalia Mattiello; N Charlotte Onland-Moret; Petra H Peeters; Elisabete Weiderpass; Inger Torhild Gram; Mie Jareid; J Ramón Quirós; Eric J Duell; Maria-Jose Sánchez; María Dolores Chirlaque; Eva Ardanaz; Nerea Larrañaga; Björn Nodin; Jenny Brändstedt; Annika Idahl; Kay-Tee Khaw; Naomi Allen; Marc Gunter; Mattias Johansson; Laure Dossus; Melissa A Merritt; Elio Riboli; Daniel W Cramer; Rudolf Kaaks; Kathryn L Terry
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 4.234

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.