Literature DB >> 11045752

Socioeconomic differences in smoking cessation: the role of social participation.

M Lindström1, B S Hanson, P O Ostergren, G Berglund.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate whether psychosocial resources explain socioeconomic differences in smoking cessation and its maintenance.
METHODS: A subpopulation of 11,837 individuals from the Malmö Diet and Cancer Study interviewed in 1992-94, age range 45-64 years, was investigated in this cross-sectional study. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to assess relative risks of having stopped smoking, adjusting for age, country of origin, previous/current diseases, and marital status.
RESULTS: An odds ratio of 1.9 (1.4-2.5; 95% CI) for men and 2.0 (1.4-2.7; 95% CI) for women of having stopped smoking was found for higher non-manual employees when compared with unskilled manual workers. A decrease in these odds ratios was found when social participation was introduced into the model. The other three social network and social support variables were non-significant.
CONCLUSION: High social participation is a predictor of maintenance of smoking cessation. It seems possible to interpret parts of the socioeconomic differences in smoking cessation and its maintenance as a consequence of differing social network resources and social capital between socioeconomic groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11045752

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Public Health        ISSN: 1403-4948            Impact factor:   3.021


  26 in total

1.  Smoking and financial stress.

Authors:  M Siahpush; R Borland; M Scollo
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 7.552

2.  Social capital and smoking among Asian American men: an exploratory study.

Authors:  Shijian Li; Jorge Delva
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Impact of different aspects of social participation and social capital on smoking cessation among daily smokers: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  M Lindström; S-O Isacsson; S Elmståhl
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 7.552

4.  Social norms, collective efficacy, and smoking cessation in urban neighborhoods.

Authors:  Deborah Karasek; Jennifer Ahern; Sandro Galea
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Does workplace social capital buffer the effects of job stress? A cross-sectional, multilevel analysis of cigarette smoking among U.S. manufacturing workers.

Authors:  Amy L Sapp; Ichiro Kawachi; Glorian Sorensen; Anthony D LaMontagne; S V Subramanian
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.162

6.  Associations between community attachments and adolescent substance use in nationally representative samples.

Authors:  Laura Wray-Lake; Jennifer L Maggs; Lloyd D Johnston; Jerald G Bachman; Patrick M O'Malley; John E Schulenberg
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2012-03-03       Impact factor: 5.012

7.  Psychosocial work conditions, social capital, and daily smoking: a population based study.

Authors:  M Lindström
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 7.552

8.  Transitions in Smokers' Social Networks After Quit Attempts: A Latent Transition Analysis.

Authors:  Bethany C Bray; Rachel A Smith; Megan E Piper; Linda J Roberts; Timothy B Baker
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 4.244

9.  Neighborhood racial composition, social capital and black all-cause mortality in Philadelphia.

Authors:  Rebbeca N Hutchinson; Mary A Putt; Lorraine T Dean; Judith A Long; Chantal A Montagnet; Katrina Armstrong
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  The role of social support and social networks in smoking behavior among middle and older aged people in rural areas of South Korea: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  E Hwa Yun; Yoon Hwa Kang; Min Kyung Lim; Jin-Kyoung Oh; Jung Min Son
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-02-18       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.